WW1: Has poetry distorted our view of the war?
Have we made a schoolboy error?
When we think of World War One we picture weary soldiers ‘coughing like hags’ cursing as they wade through ‘the sludge’ of the trenches.
We hear the ‘guttering’ and ‘gargling’ of a dying man and almost taste the ‘green sea’ of lethal mustard gas.
These vivid impressions sprang from the pen of Wilfred Owen, a junior officer in the trenches. He joined up as a patriotic idealist but became disillusioned as a result of first-hand experience of battle. It is easy to assume that the powerful words of this young man from Shropshire captured the true experience of the war. But is that assumption right? Or has our focus on poems like Owen's distorted our view of the war?
The poem we all remember
Owen is considered one of the greatest war poets, thanks in part to his moving poem Dulce et Decorum Est.
The poem describes a gas attack in the trenches and pulsates with a sense of horror and outrage. It has been taught in schools for 50 years.
Wilfred Owen's rise to the top
A select group of well-educated soldier officers, including Wilfred Owen, came to view the war as one of pity and horror. This was a minority view but expressed through powerful and well-written poetry. In the 1960s a literary elite decided this was the most authentic view of the conflict because it chimed with their own anti-war feelings. This resulted in the publication of two key war poetry anthologies edited by Brian Gardner and Ian Parsons. These heavily featured Owen and other poets whose work seemed to suggest World War One had been futile.
One voice among thousands
While Owen wrote powerful poetry, he was just one of 2,225 men and women from Britain and Ireland who had poems published during World War One.
Owen wrote his anti-jingoistic poem as part of his therapy to overcome shellshock but his was just one, very personal, reaction to war. Other verses submitted to trench magazines reveal how soldiers also used humour and anti-German feeling to cope with the conflict. Much poetry written on the front line, such as by the poet Padre Woodbine Willie, was about everyday concerns like where the next rum ration was coming from.
Women's experience of war
A quarter of poems published during World War One were by women compared to a fifth written by soldiers.
Their poetry reveals how women participated during the war - working and debating, suffering and sacrificing. As Evelyn Underhill wrote in her poem ‘Non-combatants’: “Never of us be said/We had no war to wage.”
Women on the homefront battled against the fear and terror they felt for the safety of their fathers, husbands and sons far away. “Theirs be the hard, but ours the lonely bed,” Evelyn Underhill wrote. Millions of women knew they could face a future without their loved ones.
Women were portrayed by some soldier-poets as innocent and idealistic – but literature from the time suggests this was an unfair stereotype. The highly-regarded poet Charlotte Mew was all too aware of the shattering impact of war. In her poem 'June, 1915' she describes "a great broken world with eyes gone dim/ From too much looking on the face of grief, the face of dread.”
Women’s poetry and songs also reflected the new roles they took on during the war. By 1918 close to a million women worked in ammunition factories. The job was dangerous and working with TNT turned their skin yellow and caused their hair to fall out.
Despite this, female munition workers were proud to be ‘doing their bit.’ In the song We're The Girls From Arsenal they sang: “Some people style us ‘canaries’/But we’re working for the lads across the sea/ If it were not for the munition lassies/Where would the Empire be?” These lyrics show strong self-belief that they were making a difference - which indeed they were. They also reveal again the important connection felt between women at home and men on the front.
Should we change what we teach?
We've seen that relying on a small canon of poems gives us a very narrow view of both war poetry and the feelings and thoughts of people who lived through the conflict.
Historians have realised this and long since moved away from a 1960s mindset. However, many of us are still stuck with this skewed view of the war because we still learn about it through a handful of poets in English class. Is it time for this to change?
Secondary school English teacher, Sonya Gavaghan
I like teaching Owen’s poems because the language and ideas are accessible to young people but students would benefit from tackling a wider selection of poetry. However we only have eight weeks in which to cover six poems as well as a Shakespeare play and so we must work toward exam essays. Teachers also tend to choose texts that are taught by other schools as it means there will already be a good variety of external resources available.
War poetry expert, Dr Santanu Das, King's College
I think we should definitely keep teaching Owen as he is a wonderful poet and is a vital part of the cultural memory of World War One. His poems are extraordinarily rich. However we should also widen the canvas and read alongside him war poems by other poets - male and female, combatant and civilian, and from beyond the UK and Europe – who wrote powerfully about the conflict. War poetry is often read as history by proxy and this needs to change: we need to pay more attention to questions of poetic form.
Chair of examiners at OCR, Andrew Bradford
Our approach is always evolving and we do make changes to the literature we offer with each new syllabus. War poetry is nearly always included within the requirement for 'literary heritage' in English Language and English Literature. Our job is to offer interesting poems, which use vivid language and show how poetry works. It’s not the role of English to give a wider and balanced picture of the war, although OCR have set poems that offer different responses to the war.