This entry is now closed for comments.
Arbee I am sensing you are a Cif (Jif) fan or perhaps you like brillo pads 🙂
@59 DavidSI have had two posts removed rexponding to your post so here goes. Third time lucky. Ahem .I tnink your post is unoriginal, lacks intelligence and is not relevant to the topic of conversation. I personally do not find it witty, amusing, relevant or worthy of a space on a HYS .I also think you might benefit grom researching the subject of the HYS before posting.
This comment was removed because it broke the house rules. Explain
@wolf359Well said. Class is permanent and Ajax have it. Comparing Ajax with any club from the SPL is like comparing a Ferrari with a Reliant Robin. Of course the dutch league should have better access to the CL.
@19 galaxy"I remember when Ajax used to clean upMy bathroom"Hahahahaha . Side splitting humour . I can't stop laughing because of your amazing wit .You like other posters have made this hilarious and original connection . well done.I will try to stop laughing .Shouldn't be too hard.
bbc "Ajax are on course to reach the Champions League group stages".... unless they lose the away game 2 - 0!Ajax have a European history to be proud of, but there's no way they should have a HYS on here just as a result of a qualifying first leg win.It's proven by idiots bringing up "it's called the champions league but it's not just for champions" for the 10000th time.
@56 You are mixing Ajax with Liverpool.Both play in red so I can see your confusion.Ajax Amsterdam won the Champions League/European cup years before Liverpool ever did.
Ajax are one of Europes top clubs and should be in the Champions League,unlike Glasgow Celtic who do not deserve to be in Europe as the SPL is so weak it is a joke.
@56 and 55You clearly know nothing about dutch football, its pedigree and its fan base. Best do some research before posting gibberish.
57 you sound like a communist. It's not that clubs are given places for having the most money. It's based on real performances in Europe by each league. You can argue that richer leagues have richer clubs who buy better players, but that brings us back to the question of capitalism vs communism. In communism, the money would be pooled and shared equally. In capitalism, rich clubs buy top players.
We're having some problems displaying the comments at the moment. Sorry. We're doing our best to fix it.
You must sign in to rate comments