The Hundred: Southern Brave underline favourites tag with dominant win over Oval Invincibles
Last updated on .From the section The Hundred
The Hundred, Ageas Bowl |
---|
Southern Brave 115-3 (100 balls): Dunkley 58* (39); Farrant 2-22 |
Oval Invincibles 85 (94 balls): Van Niekerk 31 (32); Wellington 4-12, Bell 3-22 |
Southern Brave won by 30 runs |
Scorecard.Table |
Southern Brave underlined why they are favourites for the women's Hundred title with a dominant 30-run victory over possible final opponents Oval Invincibles.
Brave, who had already secured top spot in the table and a place in the final, needed Sophia Dunkley's 58 not out to post a competitive 115-3 on a slow pitch at The Ageas Bowl.
But a terrific spell from Australia leg-spinner Amanda-Jade Wellington, who took the best figures of the competition with 4-12, saw the Invincibles crumble to a dismal 85 all out off 94 balls.
The Invincibles, who were also sloppy in the field, had already guaranteed second spot and a place in the eliminator, but will need to improve on this showing to stand a chance of winning the tournament.
They will most likely discover their eliminator opponents on Tuesday, when Northern Superchargers face Birmingham Phoenix, though their remains a slim mathematical chance of London Spirit qualifying.
An assured Brave side, who won all but one of their group games, await the winners of Friday's eliminator in the showpiece at Lord's on Saturday.
Dunkley's stellar summer
Making history, headlines and heaps of runs - Dunkley, 23, is enjoying a superb summer with the bat.
This was her second 50 in The Hundred and highest score in the competition so far, helping Brave post a competitive total after a sluggish start.
Mainly using her timing and power to target the leg side, she brought up her half-century with a six that thudded into the boundary foam.
In June, she became the first black woman to play Test cricket for England and scored 74 not out on debut against India, also hitting an unbeaten 73 in her first one-day international innings against the same side.
Building on that with her form in The Hundred suggests she can provide England with the middle order support they require for top-order stars Heather Knight, Tammy Beaumont and Nat Sciver.
Invincibles crumble to brilliant Brave
After an initially disciplined bowling display, the Invincibles lost momentum with two misfields that cost boundaries, and two poor drops by Jo Gardner.
Brave were similarly careless in the field, their one area of concern, with Tara Norris fumbling a clear run-out chance, Gaby Lewis dropping a chance to remove Marizanne Kapp over the rope for six and a missed stumping.
But Lewis made amends as Kapp picked her out off Wellington, the start of a collapse of eight wickets for just 21 runs in 30 balls.
Invincibles' captain Dane van Niekerk provided some resistance before Wellington removed her for 31 and she will be frustrated to see her line-up play so many reckless shots.
Though it's easy to see why teams can fall in a heap against the Brave bowlers - Wellington's 4-12 beats the previous best mark of 4-13 by team-mate Anya Shrubsole, with Wellington also having previously taken 4-14.
One more win in Saturday's final at Lord's, and the trophy is Brave's.
Comments
Join the conversation
Yes have limited-over cricket but a balance has to be achieved. For me I would have either the 100 or the T20 (my personal preference) but not both.
Football: 21
Test: 11
Hundred: 11
Racism; troubled past of black sportpeople: 6
Tom Daley - his personality, not his sport: 3
Olympics: 2
Paralympics: 2
Rugby - women only: 1
Tennis: 1
American football: 1
County cricket: 1
Dissenters to The Hundred ask yourself this "What happens to Test Cricket if the Next Generation don't accept it, due to complete lack of interest when handed to them?"
The Hundred isn't meant for us, look @ it as entry level cricket.
I'd suggest every Tour de France winner first rode a bike with stabilisers?
I am a football fan and a Wetherspoons drinker and the Hundred has caught my eye a bit. It’s not “proper test cricket” and nor is it supposed to be. It’s supposed to entice people like myself who like a lairy atmosphere and big hitting. I don’t mind if I miss a couple of deliveries because Alex Horne is telling me how much fun he’s having, good for him!
I've been watching test cricket since the 70's and this is the worst England team I have seen. But their inadequacy is nothing to do with SF cricket, Sibley and Burns aren't any good at that either.
15 overs left to bowl and you have the game under control.
So you bring back on the one bowler who has struggled, Why? Just because they are a friend?
They get smacked all over the place leaking precious runs, and it turns the whole game. Its a big difference to chase 95-100 rather than 115.
Perhaps she's been taking lessons from Joe Root!!??