Neon Roberts brain tumour case: Court delays ruling

Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionSally Roberts: "He's very good in himself"

A judge has postponed a decision on whether a mother should be allowed to prevent her son from receiving radiotherapy for brain cancer.

Sally Roberts, 37, has been told seven-year-old Neon could die if he did not receive the treatment.

She said she feared the treatment could do long-term harm.

At the High Court in London, Mr Justice Bodey said he would rule at a hearing beginning on 18 December - unless agreement could be reached beforehand.

During the Saturday morning hearing, he said that although he had intended to rule on the matter, developments had "changed the medical landscape".

After the hearing at the Family Division, New Zealand-born Ms Roberts said she "can't add to what the judge said".

She added that, health-wise, her son was "very good in himself". Neon's father, Ben, said he would not comment.

'Lower IQ'

Sally Roberts went into hiding with her son on Wednesday, sparking a nationwide search before both were found unharmed.

The boy was operated on last year and a tumour was removed successfully.

The judge is being asked to decide whether it is in Neon's best interests to undergo treatment.

Doctors have said it was "clearly" in Neon's best interests to undergo radiotherapy and chemotherapy, arguing the treatment was standard procedure and offered Neon the best chance.

However, Ms Roberts said she only wanted her son to have chemotherapy, as she feared radiotherapy would result in long-term brain damage, reducing his IQ and also possibly making him infertile.

A lawyer representing the health authorities who are treating him told the court the "alternative is death".

A barrister outlined Ms Roberts's position in written arguments at the start of the hearing.

"Much sympathy it is hoped will be felt for her overall position," Robin Tolson QC told the court.

Image caption Doctors and Neon Roberts' mother do not agree on what his next treatment should be

"The mother's position in this litigation... is principled, reasonable and in the best interests of Neon."

Ms Roberts told the court on Friday that she was not a "bonkers mother" and her barrister described her position as "principled".

Ms Roberts apologised to the court and said she only wanted the best for her son.

The judge has described Neon's illness as the "stuff of every parent's nightmare" and has said he will balance what radiotherapy treatment would achieve against the "downsides".

More on this story

Related Internet links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites