Two Christian guesthouse owners who refused to allow a gay couple to stay in a double room have lost their appeal against a ruling they acted unlawfully.
Peter and Hazelmary Bull, from Cornwall, took their case to the Court of Appeal.
The couple had refused to allow civil partners Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall, from Bristol, the room at Chymorvah House in 2008.
They were ordered in January 2011 to pay £3,600 in damages.
The challenge by the couple, whose guesthouse is in Marazion, was rejected by three judges in London.
They had appealed against a conclusion by a judge at Bristol County Court that they acted unlawfully when they turned the couple away.
Judge Andrew Rutherford ruled last year that the Bulls had breached equality legislation.
The appeal judges heard that the Bulls thought any sex outside marriage was a "sin", but denied they had discriminated against Mr Hall and Mr Preddy.
Mr Bull, 72, and Mrs Bull, who is in her late 60s, were not in court for the ruling.
'Promoting a sin'
During the hearing of the appeal in November, James Dingemans QC, for the Bulls, argued that the couple were entitled to hold "outdated" religious beliefs.
He said the Bulls operated a policy directed towards sexual practice not sexual orientation and said they believed that permitting unmarried people - whether heterosexual or homosexual - to share a double bed involved them in "promoting a sin".
Mr Dingemans said the Bulls were not trying to undermine the rights of Mr Hall and Mr Preddy and judges had to carefully balance all human rights involved.
Robin Allen QC, for Mr Hall and Mr Preddy, argued that his clients had a "lawful civil partnership" and the guesthouse should have been "open" to them in the same way it was to heterosexual married couples.
The judges heard that the Bulls' appeal was funded by the Christian Institute and Mr Hall and Mr Preddy were backed by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.
After the ruling, John Wadham, the commission's group legal director, said: "I have genuine sympathy for Mr and Mrs Bull, as their beliefs are clearly strongly held.
"We believe that this case will help people to better understand the law around freedom of religion.
"When offering a service, people cannot use their beliefs - religious or otherwise - to discriminate against others."
'Penalised for beliefs'
He added that the commission had no intention of enforcing its entitlement to legal costs.
Simon Calvert, of the Christian Institute, said: "Peter and Hazelmary have been penalised for their beliefs about marriage.
"Not everyone will agree with Peter and Hazelmary's beliefs, but a lot of people will think it is shame that the law doesn't let them live and work according to their own values under their own roof."
Ben Summerskill, chief executive of the lesbian, gay and bisexual charity Stonewall, said he was "delighted" that the court upheld the judgment.
He said: "The court's decision vindicates Stonewall's hard lobbying to make it illegal to deny goods or services to someone just because they happen to be gay.
"That obviously includes hotel rooms for many gay holidaymakers.
"I hope Mr and Mrs Bull will now feel content to go home to do God's good work as Easter approaches, instead of relentlessly pursuing a happy couple through the courts."