UK

Olympic Games security: May to make urgent statement

Home Secretary Theresa May is to make an urgent statement in the Commons on Olympics security, after it emerged an extra 3,500 troops were needed.

The defence secretary had been due to submit a written statement but Labour tabled an urgent question to the House.

The troops are in addition to 13,500 already agreed, amid fears contractor G4S may not have enough trained staff.

G4S said it had "encountered some delays" in processing applicants through the final stages of training.

Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, tabled an urgent question to the government on Olympics security after earlier saying he would write to the home secretary for an explanation.

He said he was "deeply concerned" that G4S were unable to deliver their contract and that "the Home Office have left contingency plans to the last moment".

Mr Vaz said he had also asked G4S's chief executive and chairman to appear before the committee next week.

Meanwhile, MPs on the Intelligence and Security Committee have warned in their annual report that the Olympics have put Britain's intelligence and security agencies under "unprecedented pressure".

The chief inspector of borders has also raised fresh concerns about the border controls at Heathrow in the run-up to the Olympics.

'Very tight schedule'

G4S is being paid £300m to supply 10,000 guards for the Games, but the BBC understands it has not been able to guarantee it can deliver that number.

Security minister James Brokenshire told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that G4S had previously been very clear about their ability to comply with the terms of their contract.

"We've been challenging them, asking the questions, really going down and kicking the tyres and doing all those sorts of things and they have been very robust about the fact that they would deliver on the contract. It has only been in these last few weeks that these issues have emerged."

In a statement, G4S said its Games deployment was "unprecedented and very complex" and being "carried out to a very tight schedule".

The company said it had 4,000 staff working across 100 venues and more than 9,000 still being trained, vetted and accredited.

"We have encountered some delays in progressing applicants through the final stages but we are working extremely hard to process these as swiftly as possible," it said.

'Safe and secure'

In a statement, the Home Office said: "We have agreed to offer help to G4S by revising the level of military support."

"The government is committing £553m for venue security and we remain confident that we will deliver within budget."

Shadow Olympics minister Tessa Jowell said it was "imperative" that action was taken to ensure there were adequate staff to make the Games safe and secure.

Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionTessa Jowell: "It's a matter of concern that this failure of G4S seems to have emerged"

"We need to know why the problem has emerged so late in the day and precisely what has been agreed to," she said.

"We also must know whether this affects Army commitments elsewhere, which units are providing people and what terms and conditions are given for those who will likely lose periods of leave."

Retired Colonel Richard Kemp, a former infantry commander in the British Army, said the timing of the announcement was "bizarre".

"We've known about the Olympic Games for seven years, if we couldn't have planned better than this then there's something wrong," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

Colonel Kemp said he understood many of the extra troops being drafted in had just returned from Afghanistan - or were about to be deployed there - and would have been due to go on leave.

The BBC understands the extra military personnel were put on a "one day" notice to move recently, in anticipation of the problems at G4S.

Labour has called for the families of any extra personnel being drafted in to be given free Olympics tickets.

The Police Federation of England and Wales said the G4S staffing issue showed the priority for private companies would always be profit and that it had warned that privatising policing would put the public at risk.

Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionCol Richard Kemp: "This is very bizarre, how it has come about"

"If the Olympic debacle media reports are accurate, then it is very clear that these private contracts are built upon an expectation that the public sector will step in to pick up the pieces if private industry fails to deliver."

The government has previously said a total security force of 23,700 will take care of venue security, including up to 7,500 troops from the 13,500 involved in total, plus the G4S contingent and volunteers.

G4S will have overall control of security at more than 30 Olympics sporting venues and 70 "non-competition" venues such as car parks and hotels.

Some of the people contracted to work for G4S have told the BBC the company has given them little information.

One caller to BBC Radio 5live, Jane, from Manchester, said she had heard nothing from G4S since April.

"I had an interview in March and I had training for a security licence in April, and then since then there has been very little information about what actually the job role is," she said.

"I have had no job training. I don't even know where I'm going to work, or what kind of work its going to be or when it's going to start."

Are you a member of the armed forces? Have you been asked to work on Olympic security? Will you be working at the site with G4S? Send us your comments using the form below.

Your contact details

If you are happy to be contacted by a BBC journalist please leave a telephone number that we can contact you on. In some cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name as you provide it and location, unless you state otherwise. Your contact details will never be published. When sending us pictures, video or eyewitness accounts at no time should you endanger yourself or others, take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws. Please ensure you have read the terms and conditions.

Terms and conditions

The BBC's Privacy Policy

More on this story

Related Internet links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites