A study has rejected claims that Triceratops and the lesser-known Torosaurus are one and the same type of dinosaur.
Research published in 2010suggested the two-horned animals represented merely different growth stages, withTorosaurusthe adult andTriceratopsthe youngster.
But researchers at Yale University say the fossils do not support the theory.
Details are publishedin the journal Plos One.
Nicholas Longrich and Daniel Field, of Yale University, looked at 35 specimens ascribed to both species and concluded they represented two distinct creatures.
"We looked at a bunch of changes in the skulls as the animals age and used a programme to arrange the skulls from youngest to oldest," explained Dr Longrich to BBC News.
"What we found is there are youngTorosaurusindividuals and very oldTriceratopsindividuals and that's inconsistent withTorosaurusbeing an adultTriceratops."
Skulls attributed to theTorosaurusboast a longer frill with large holes whileTriceratopshas a smaller solid frill.
Dr Longrich argues that if these were the same animal, they would also expect to find transitional specimens in which the skull is morphing between the two skull types.
"We reviewed the evidence and there was no evidence for anything betweenTorosaurusandTriceratops. There are dozens and dozens of skulls and I think if those transitional forms really existed we would have found them."
Where the researchers say they could not find conclusive evidence for two species was the geographical distribution of the fossil evidence.
Fossils attributed to both species are found exclusively in North America, and although there are some sites where only one proposed genus has been found, the evidence could also be consistent with the single-species theory.
Responding to the paper, John Scannella of Montana Sate University, who co-authored the 2010 paper proposing a single species, said he was unconvinced.
"Nothing in the Longrich and Field paper falsifies the synonymy ofTriceratopsandTorosaurus," he told BBC News.
"TriceratopsandTorosaurusoverlap geographically and stratigraphically;Torosaurusare more mature than otherTriceratops, as has been demonstrated multiple times by examination of the bone microstructure; and there are numerous intermediate specimens which demonstrate the transition from the solid frill ofTriceratopsto the expanded, fenestrated (holed) condition observed inTorosaurus."
Mr Scannella also pointed tohis 2011 paperin which he described what he views as a transitionalTriceratopsheld by the Smithsonian in Washington.
"It has a small hole in its frill whereTorosaurushas a larger hole, but Longrich and Field suggest that it is simply pathological. There are many other transitional specimens, several of which have been collected in recent years by the Museum of the Rockies."
Michael Pittman of the Department of Earth Sciences at University College London, said: "In the four-legged herbivorous dinosaurs likeTriceratops, the skeleton changes as the animal grows; this happens in most tetrapods including in humans. So it's important that these growth-related changes are taken into account."
"The study shows how the skulls of this group of dinosaurs probably grew, and appears to falsify the hypothesis thatTorosaurusis an adultTriceratops.
"The methods used in the study have broader value for helping to reconstruct growth series in other dinosaurs, which could potentially help to test similar hypotheses in other dinosaur groups."
Prof Paul Sereno, a palaeontologist at the University of Chicago, said the single-species theory "never sat well in my mind" and said palaeontology sometimes goes too far in eliminating creatures "that deserve their status as separate species".
"BesidesTorosaurusnot fitting neatly into a geriatricTriceratopshypothesis, the authors also remind us of other features involving the ornamental frill bones and shape of the fenestrae (frill holes) that differ inTorosauruswhen compared to similar frill bones and depressions inTriceratops."