BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

24 September 2014
Inside Out: Surprising Stories, Familiar Places

BBC Homepage
Inside Out
East Midlands
North East
North West
South East
South West
West Midlands
Yorks & Lincs
Go to BBC1 programmes page (image: BBC1 logo)

Contact Us

 Inside Out - East Midlands: Monday June 30, 2003


Richard 3 battle reenactment
Shakespeare's image of a murderous villain has stuck

King Richard III is often depicted as a ruthless tyrant, but new evidence suggests he's been much maligned. Inside Out takes a trip back in time to Bosworth to uncover the 'real Richard'.

Think of King Richard III and most people conjure up images of an evil tyrant with a hunched back and murderous appetite for power.

We can blame Shakespeare for discrediting the monarch who ascended to the throne amidst some of the greatest power battles in English history.

But the real Richard was far removed from Shakespeare's monstrous caricature who died at the Battle of Bosworth Field in Leicestershire.


1452 - Born at Fotheringay Castle in Northamptonshire

1461 - Richard became Duke of Gloucester

1471 - Took a leading part in the battles of Barnet and Tewkesbury. Married Anne Neville

1483 - Named Protector of the realm and Edward IV's heirs

June 1483 - Edward IV's sons bastardised by Richard

October 1483 - Princes in the Tower disappear in mysterious circumstances

July 6, 1485 - Richard III crowned king

August 22, 1485 - Richard III killed at Bosworth

The real Richard

Historians have uncovered new evidence which further discredits the Shakespeare view of Richard III as a power- hungry despot.

Richard's reputation as a symbol of evil only started after his death.

Most of the bad press around Richard III was initiated by Tudor propagandists, including Thomas More and William Shakespeare.

Richard was also depicted by Tudor artists with a hunchback and withered arm and limp.

But these pictures were painted long after Richard's death.

Earlier portraits show no signs of the king being physically deformed nor is there any written evidence of any disability.

Who was Richard?

Richard was the youngest son of Richard Plantagenet, Duke of York, who was the heir to the line of descent of Edward III.

Richard was created Duke of Gloucester in 1461 after his eldest brother, Edward, had deposed Henry VI and been crowned Edward IV.

When Edward IV died, Richard became protector of the realm for the dead king's son, the 12 year old Edward V.

Richard waged a campaign to get the boy and his brother declared bastards, and proclaimed himself king.


Ron Cook as Shakespeare's Richard  III
Richard was a reformer and champion of the common people not a despot

The Richard III Society is dedicated to reclaiming the reputation of the monarch who died over 500 years ago.

They are keen to pint out that in his own lifetime, Richard's reputation was high particularly in the North where he defended England successfully against the Scots.

Richard also introduced many reforms and bettered the living standards and liberties of the common people.

The Princes in the Tower

One of the worst accusations levelled at Richard III was that he murdered the Princes in the Tower.

Once Richard had been crowned and his nephews bastardised, some historians believe that the young princes were no longer a threat.

But their disappearance led to a great controversy around Richard and accusations of murder still linger.

Bosworth Field - a kingdom for a horse

Richard III's reign ended in an ignominious defeat and his death at Bosworth Field in Leicestershire in 1485.

Lay-by with burger van
Was the new king of England really crowned in a lay-by where there's now a burger bar?

Henry Tudor's troops came head-to-head with the king's army at Bosworth.

Although Richard boasted a bigger army, he was defeated and became the last English king to die on the battlefield.

Today's Bosworth Field boasts a visitor centre and a battlefield trail, but is it the real site of the battle?

It seems strange that Richard III crammed all his troops into a small hilltop visible to the enemy's forces.

A new theory suggests that the battle site is not here but eight miles away on the Warwickshire border near Atherstone.

The battle of Merevale?

Some historians believe that the climax of the battle and crowning of Henry VII took place in what is now a layby next to the A444.

The evidence for a new battle site is:

  • There are many local place names referring to Richard III in the Atherstone area
  • Richard's army were unlikely to have camped on top of Ambion Hill near Market Bosworth for all to see from a distance
  • Henry VII paid compensation to Merevale Abbey near to the new battle site.

Others aren't so sure, claiming that Bosworth was the battle site and that it was Richard's suspect battle tactics that led to him camping on high ground.

A historic puzzle

Merevale Abbey
Merevale has a medieval window which links to the battle between Henry and Richard

The debate about the real battle site continues but another mystery remains.

What happened to King Richard's body? Some believe it ended up in the river in Leicester.

At least three skulls have been recovered from the river that could be the head of Richard III.

Whilst there is no solid evidence to suggest that two are Richard, the third skull remains in the hands of a collector whose identity is a secret.

One thing is certain - the true Richard III remains an enigma just like the mystery of the battle of Bosworth Field itself.

See also ...

BBC History: Richard III

On the rest of the web
Richard III Society
Richard III Museum
Society of Friends of Richard III
Richard III Foundation
Kings and Queens of England
Virtual Museum

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external websites

Inside Out Archive

Inside Out: East Midlands
View our story archive to see articles from previous series.

BBC Where I Live

Find local news, entertainment, debate and more ...


Meet your
Inside Out
Marie Ashby

Marie Ashby
your local Inside Out presenter.

Contact us
Contact the East Midlands team with the issues that affect you.

Free email updates

Keep in touch and receive your free and informative Inside Out updates.


Readers' Comments

We are not adding any new comments to this page but you can still read some of the comments previously submitted by readers.

Nita Knapp
I think Michael Jones has a valid argument for the battle being near Merevale/Atherstone and if Leicestershire wants to maintain Ambien Hill and area as a battlefield site for re-enactments and historical information that is fine, but it should be acknowledged from the evidence Mr Jones has uncovered that there is a site which is a far more logical place for a battle to have been found and Warwickshire should endeavour to make this site known also.

Miss Charlotte Belle
It is great to see fresh and tantilising new ideas using evidence all around us. All credit to those who have researched this new battle site. I watched the TV programme and thoroughly enjoyed it.

About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy