« Previous | Main | Next »


Post categories:

Adam Curtis | 16:01 UK time, Friday, 18 September 2009

I am researching the extraordinary history of the West's relationship to Afghanistan over the past 200 years. It is a very complex, and sometimes weird, story. These are notes on some of the characters and episodes involved.

Part One - 1971

There are many individuals and fragmentary events that have led to the present situation in Afghanistan. But there was a moment in 1971 when four separate things happened in and around Kabul that in their different ways reached back into the past and forward into the future.

That year the BBC sent a film crew to Kabul to recreate the first great military disaster of the British Empire - the retreat from Kabul in 1841. The BBC began by gathering Afghan tribesmen together to be extras. They acted out being taught cricket by the British. The Afghans then pretended to be fierce rebels storming out of the Kabul Bazaar to attack the British camp outside the city.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

The BBC's adviser was Louis Dupree. Louis Dupree with AfghanNancy and Louis Dupree He was an American who had lived in Kabul since 1955. He will appear in many different ways in this story. But for the moment all you need to know is that he had once walked the route of the British retreat alone in winter, and also that he knew everyone in power in Kabul.

Dupree had noticed that the demonstrations by the students at Kabul University were increasing, and often degenerating into fights. At the end of 1970 he took a photograph of one. It is grainy and indistinct, but he had caught a moment which was to have immense consequences for everyone in Afghanistan, and around the world.

Kabul University demonstration

Kabul university had been created by the West, in particular by America and West Germany. Kabul University, 1969

Then the Soviet Union decided they had to pour money in too. So they built the enormous Kabul Polytechnic. Kabul Polytechnic, 1970

Both were seedbeds for western ideas, Foreign students and teachers from the west had flooded in Blonde woman and Afghans and with them came the modern revolutionary ideas from the campuses in Europe and America. And very quickly the Kabul students set up a wide range of Leninist and Maoist groups.

Dupree had captured the moment when those groups had begun to confront a new group of revolutionaries on campus. They were the Islamists. The Islamists too had taken revolutionary ideas from the West but they had fused them with Islam. One of the Islamist groups had found a poem written by a Leninist student that praised Lenin using a term reserved only for the prophet Mohammed.


They sneakily showed it to a group of conservative mullahs in Kabul and all hell broke loose.

All sorts of people were in and around the demonstrations and battles that followed and many of them will appear later in this story.

Kabul was trying to imitate the West in other ways. Abdul Habib Aziz had recently opened the only supermarket in Afghanistan. canned goods Then in the spring of 1971 one of Italy's leading conceptual artists turned up in Kabul and decided to buy the building above Mr Aziz's supermarket and turn it into a hotel. One Hotel The artist was called Alighiero e Boetti. Boetti is a fascinating and mysterious figure. He was part of the artistic avant-garde that emerged from 1960s radicalism in Italy. Boetti with an owl

Boetti was fascinated by chance and randomness. He would post letters to other artists he knew with the wrong address and then show the ones that were returned. His works often had secret codes built into them. Some of the codes have been cracked, others remain mysterious. No-one knows if the hotel was a conceptual art-work in itself or just somewhere for him and his friends to stay. But what is certain is that Boetti saw in Afghanistan a way of solving what he saw as the central crisis in the West, the overwhelming belief in the individual as an inspired creator.

Boetti had started as a member of the Arte Povera group. Like many avant-garde groups at that time they wanted to challenge the 'system', and to do that they attacked the notion of self-expression and the creation of things and objects - which they believed was central to consumer capitalism. Boetti said that what he saw in Afghanistan was the opposite. It was a country empty of created things.

"Afghan homes, for example, are empty: no furniture therefore no objects commonly placed on furniture. There are only a few carpets and mattresses on which people lie down, drink, smoke and eat. I also like the fact that Afghans wear the same clothes at day and at night. Nothing has been added to the landscape. Rocks are moved and used to build cube houses. The resistance with which Afghans oppose our civilisation has always amazed me."

Following his principles Boetti found Abib and Fatima. They were embroiderers, and he gave them maps of the world as it was then in 1971 with all its borders. It was, he said, a given diagram of power in the world. He asked the two women to create a series of embroidered maps where each country would be coloured by its own flag. After that Boetti said, I did nothing. And 500 women started making the maps overseen by Abib and Fatima.


Just as the Afghan student revolutionaries had strange dreams of the west which they were going to try and impose on Afghanistan, so Boetti was trying to use a strange fantasy version of Afghanistan to free himself from the conventions of the west.

Meanwhile the BBC crew had moved location along the road to Jalalabad. They were retracing the terrible retreat of British soldiers when out of 16,000 only one man made it the 115 miles. Again the BBC used local tribesmen to act out the massacre - showing how their ancestors had poured fire down on the terrified British soldiers.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

The tone of the BBC programme is of its time. It is determined also to show the dark side of the British Empire, the horrific acts of cruelty ordered by the British high command. It is saying - we may have lost an empire but we have become better people, and such horrors will never happen again.

At the end of the film is a scene showing how the British would tie Indian rebels to cannon muzzles and blow them to pieces. But a few years ago that section was edited out and you have to get special permission to show it. Things had changed again.

It is very horrific and absolutely not for the squeamish, but if you want to have a look at it - here it is.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.

As the BBC were filming a group of students from Nottingham University drove past. They were a group of mountaineers who were on their way to their first expedition outside Europe. They were going to climb a peak in the Hindu Kush called Koh-i-Khaaik. Their leader was called Peter Boardman. He would become one of the world's most famous climbers, but this particular trip was going to go terribly wrong.

In 1977 Boardman recorded a description to camera of what happened both literally, and inside his own mind during his terrifying ordeal. And how Afghanistan had haunted him ever since.


In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.


  • Comment number 1.

    Interesting stuff, nice to see your not going to let the BBC completely wipe that reenactment of execution by cannon from history because it's considered untasteful.
    Let's hope this is the beginning of more regular blogging from Mr Curtis.

  • Comment number 2.

    This is really interesting stuff. Mr. Curtis I see your desire to transcend traditional linear narrative by moving beyond standard film/video format continues, utilizing the advantages of the internet as you had previously indicated you were interested in doing.

    However as you move away from strictly using video footage, the inacessability of non-UK residents like myself to view the video portions of this piece makes it a bit frustrating....I understand the copyright limitations of your previous documentaries, but now we can kind of get half of what you're trying to get across but unable to access the other half. I hope there's a way around this somehow; you've most definitely piqued my curiosity.

  • Comment number 3.

    The Peter Boardman footage at the end of this piece was great to see. I like where this is all going.

  • Comment number 4.

    Very interesting archive footage. Some of it reminded me of Peter Watkins' work. The Boardman piece is great viewing, intense and passionate.

  • Comment number 5.

    I agree the Boardman piece blew me away, thank you Mr Curtis.

  • Comment number 6.

    i'm really interested in viewing all the video footage on this blog but cannot. is this because i'm viewing it from outside the UK and if so is there another way i can get my hands on the material??

  • Comment number 7.

    Ya, you can use TOR as a proxy to view the iPlayer stuff:

    Excellent blog posts btw, very interesting to read, and some fascinating videos.

  • Comment number 8.

    You can also try Mgeni : https://code.google.com/p/mgeni.

  • Comment number 9.

    Regarding the blowing of captured rebel sepoys from guns, it's important to place this in context. The officers who ordered it and the soldiers who carried it out were themselves the victims of appalling cruelty which the mutineers/rebels had carried out on them and their families.

    For example, Nana Sahib and other leading rebels, on the approach of British forces, ordered that their hostages (British women and their children) must be killed. Two Muslim butchers, two Hindu peasants and one of Nana's bodyguards went into The Bibigarh. Armed with knives and hatchets they murdered the women and children. After the massacre the walls were covered in bloody hand prints, and the floor littered with fragments of human limbs. The dead and the dying were thrown down a nearby well; when the well was full, the 50-foot deep well was filled with remains to within 6 feet of the top, the remainder were thrown into the Ganges.

    This was only one of hundreds of atrocities committed against British families, so whilst deploring the actions of the army, one must recognise the background.

    There are two sides to every story.

  • Comment number 10.

    So that makes it OK? Atrocity in revenge for atrocity is surely not an excuse, especially when one is an occupying force.

  • Comment number 11.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.