 |
|
Broadcast
5th October 2000
 |
EMI AND WARNER RECORDS MERGER COLLAPSES
The $20 billion merger of EMI and Warner Records is off, at least
for now. The two withdrew their application to the European Commission
apparently anticipating a European block.
This deal appears to have got tangled up in an even bigger story,
the merger of Warner Records parent TimeWarner and the internet
group AOL.
For a reaction to the news our reporter Roger White spoke to Hamish
Champ, European editor of Music Business International:

"It does leave open the question of what happens firstly to EMI
and also to deals of this sort in the future. The industry is consolidating
at a fairly fast pace and this kind of thing could get blocked in
future by other people. So one does wonder why they are saying they
are still talking.
"It is difficult to see what kind of deal in the short term
they could do to satisfy the European Commission and the shareholders."
Roger White asked Hamish Champ if the Commission really did
have a point in saying that having four record companies in Europe
was just too few?
"The independent sector, the small record companies that are non-aligned,
would definitely argue that the consolidation leads to anti-competitive
practices. I think the Commission has bared its teeth, rightly or
wrongly, and they have seen that the consumer will be the party
that loses out.
"EMI has been thinking first and foremostly of its shareholders
and the Commission has wanted to address what it sees as the needs
of consumers throughout Europe. I think what the Commission was
concerned about first and foremost, was market dominance and secondly,
the new media angle which was of concern to many with AOL having
the kind of coverage it does have."
 |
EMI
has been thinking first and foremostly of its shareholders
and the Commission has wanted to address what it sees as the
needs of consumers throughout Europe.
Hamish Champ
|
 |
Roger White asked what he meant by concern about the new media
angle?
"Basically there was concern that AOL would, with Warner and EMI,
be able to tie-up music distribution through its network subscribers
and freeze out smaller labels or other major record companies who
are at the same time setting up their own online services.
"In
a statement a few weeks ago, all the interested parties in the TimeWarner-EMI
deal said that there would be a five year open season whereby they
would not preclude any other record label on their service."
So did this have any implications for the bigger deal, the AOL TimeWarner
deal? asked Roger White.
"There
have been rumours in the United States for some time that AOL TimeWarner
would consider selling this deal down the river if it meant continuing
with it would block the AOL TimeWarner deal, which is currently
being looked at by regulators in the United States and in Europe.
"As
analysts have pointed out, they regarded this as a smaller prize
not to be continued if it meant that deal (AOL TimeWarner) was going
to fall by the wayside."
 |
There have been rumours in the United States for sometime
that AOL TimeWarner would consider selling this deal down the
river if it meant continuing with it would block the AOL TimeWarner
deal.
Hamish Champ |
 |
|