|
Those
words you may think are likely to haunt Michael Fish until his dying
day as he was the hapless Met Office forecaster who reassured a
concerned viewer who had heard of a tropical storm heading our way
back on 14th October 1987.
In fact, Fish was referring to a tropical storm over the western
part of the Atlantic and indeed, this storm stayed well clear of
the British Isles.
We do not see hurricanes in the UK. But 48 hours later, to many,
whether we had endured a 'storm' or a hurricane' was a matter of
semantics.
By then 15 million trees had been damaged or destroyed, falling
masonry had damaged buildings and cars; a Channel ferry was driven
aground at Felixstowe and 18 people lost their lives in the worst
storm to hit this country in more than 200 years.
The
Storm build up
The
development of the storm over the western and central Atlantic had
been well predicted by the computer models.
Severe weather conditions looked increasingly likely as the storm
arrived on the Thursday or Friday.
Confidence in the computer predictions decreased nearer the event
however, as it began to look that the severe weather would extend
no further north than the English Channel coast.
 |
| Severe
weather conditions looked increasingly likely as the storm arrived
on the Thursday or Friday. |
On
the Thursday afternoon the depression was still drifting slowly
in the Bay of Biscay. Its central pressure had fallen from 970 millibars
at midday to 964 millibars at 1800.
As it continued spiralling towards the western English Channel warnings
of Force 10 winds were issued. Those forecasts were increased to
Force 11 in the early hours of Friday morning as the depression
then raced across southern counties, leaving the mainland around
the Humber estuary before dawn.
Dramatic temperature rises and falls as the weather fronts cleared
through and a massive pressure surge were nothing compared to the
real signs of the depression's track.
A
Trail of Destruction
By
the time most people were rising the next morning the destruction
wrecked by the storm was plain for all to see.
Trees
across a large swathe of Southern England were flattened, blocking
roads and bringing down power and telephone lines. Roads and railway
lines were blocked by the debris.
As clearing up operations began and power and communication lines
were slowly restored (parts of East Anglia were without electricity
for five days in the aftermath) questions were being asked.
Firstly, just how bad was the storm?
A gust of 106 knots (approximately 123 MPH) was recorded at Gorleston
in Norfolk. Inland values were as high as 92 MPH at Heathrow Airport
and 98 MPH at Gatwick Airport.
Winds such as these were certainly exceptional.
For the worst affected areas the winds were as strong as anything
recorded since the last 'Great Storm' in 1703.
What
was unusual was the extent of the damage. That was largely due to
the fallen trees and they succumbed to the wind in such large numbers
due to several factors.
 |
| As
it continued spiralling towards the western English Channel
warnings of Force 10 winds were issued. |
The
wind direction was somewhat unusual - southerly. The trees were
still in leaf - the early autumn had been quite mild and wet.
Because of copious amounts of rain in the preceding few weeks, the
ground was sodden. This helped to weaken many tree roots and the
force of the wind against trees still in leaf was enough to do the
damage.
Wiltshire's
Great Storm
Compared
with the rest of Southern England, Wiltshire did not fair too badly.
Damage was fairly minor and the storm's effects were no worse than
in the typical two or three storms which hit the county each winter.
The highest gusts recorded were around the 70 MPH mark.
But
where was the warning?
The
biggest question though, one screamed from the front page of every
newspaper in the country was, "Why weren't we warned?"
Most major organisations, such as the emergency authorities and
the Ministry of Defence, did receive warnings in time to take action.
But it is also true that most members of the public had gone to
bed thinking that there would be nothing more than a 'bit of a blow'.
The fact that so many people were taken by surprise led to an internal
Met Office enquiry. As a result improvements were made to the data
from ships, buoys and satellites and the computer models were modified.
It is to be hoped that any such storms in the future will be forecast
with far greater advance warning and accuracy. But when it comes
to weather, people seem to have short memories and we are likely
to be just as surprised and shocked by any future 'Great Storms',
no matter how accurate the predictions.
Richard
Angwin
|