BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page was last updated in February 2009We've left it here for reference.More information

29 May 2012
Accessibility help
Text only
South East Wales

BBC Homepage
»
BBC Vocab: Somali
DAMIN / OFF
» Daarid, furid, daar / Turn on
» Waa maxay Vocab-ereyo? / What is VOCAB?
 

Contact Us

Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 


Morgan's Shout - House Prices

Morgan's Shout John Morgan from Varteg near Pontypool has opinions on everything - from traffic to health, the economy and more. Read his views on the stories of the day - then have your say on our message board.


Wednesday 11 August - House Prices

"In the fifties we had a serious problem with housing for the many. Then we had Rachman and McMillan's famous statement about the 'unacceptable face of capitalism'. This resulted in the 1957 Rent Act which was supposed to rein in unscrupulous landlords etc.

"In turn this led to vast quantities of almost worthless houses being sold to sitting tenants. They in turn had no spare money to 'do up' these run down properties, so in came the improvement grant schemes that did go some way to alleviate the problems faced by deterioted housing stock. Those that were too far gone went down under the slum clearance programmes that followed.

"Then we had the high rise fiasco along with the future slum developments that have blighted most towns and cities since. The government wriggled out of that mess somewhat by the selling off of council housing stock. This has led to the present situation of a supposed shortage of available housing for those requiring to be homed.

"All it seems to me to be a diabolical plot to re-enlist the vast majority of people into the ranks of the indebted. So, who gains? Certainly not the home owner. Virtually few actually own their own homes - in reality they are owned by the few wealthy folk who comprise the boards of directors of banks, building societies and other financial establishments.

"This is why there has never been any attempt by the government (of any party) to stop the ever increasing greed of the vendors, as they all try to escape the millwheel of debt around their necks, by asking ever higher prices for their houses. I inwardly scream in anguish every time I see and hear programmes on TV and radio, that tell how people buy run down properties for a pittance and spend some thousands doing it up and then sell, making five to ten times what they spent out in the first place.

"Someone has to pay for all this modern version of Rachmanism. Sooner or later, despite what all the pundits avow, there will be an almighty crash, and those who sought to profit will indeed be in deep mire, along with all the innocent ones who were compelled to follow suit in order to, either get onto the property ladder, or needed to in order to move on.

"Of course those who have engineered all this will not need to worry, as they will reap the benefit in the long run as they will acquire the ownership of thousands of properties by default due to the inability of the mortgagees to meet the re payments once the economy, again by design, will fail to sustain such profligate inroads into the wealth of the nation.

"They tell me that every man woman and child is currently in debt to the tune of 17 grand each. But there are thousands who have no debt at all. So in reality there is an actual figure far higher than 17 grand per head for those who are really in debt. Watch out you people, big money man is waiting patiently for you to stumble."

Monday 6 September

"As a further point in this subject, I have heard cries of anguish just lately from the GREEDY about the fact that because of the rise in house prices, or as it is often put, the increase in the value of their homes, they are to be penalised by the taxation system due to their assets going beyond the level at which inheritance tax is to be applied.

"My heart bleeds. Had they not been so greedy in the first place by hiking up their prices, (with the connivance of solicitors, financial advisors, and estate agents) then they would not find themselves in this position. Something for nothing is the order of the day, and tough luck on the rest if they cannot get on to the housing ladder. Under normal conditions that prevailed a few years ago, I have not the slightest doubt they rested comfortably in the knowledge that their lifestyle was being subsidised somewhat by the rich being slammed for x amount of tax when the Lord of This-or-That, or Sir Somebody-or-Other went to his grave.

"Now the chickens have come home to roost, and those to whom it was a great deal to keep on uprading houses are about to feel the wind up their trouser leg and they don't like it. Sometimes that golden bonus does not seem so golden when the time comes to pay back."

Note - Morgan's views are not necessarily shared by the BBC


  • More from Morgan's Shout

    Comment on this story

    Keith Towers Isle of Wight
    Morgan, you have hit the nail fairly and squarly on the head. Everyone needs a home as much as they need water, and the greedy worthless bankers of this world know how to sell both at extortionate prices. Their day will come of course when nobody wants their money. I have no debt, and take a special pride in refusing it when asked to take this card or that card from the various banks. Ok, I'm not rich, but I am happy.

    Sean of Durham
    Dafydd, Morgan may be trying to be emotive in his arguements, but essentially thay are sound. although I am too young to remember Rachman ( a mere 37 year old), I have a keen interest in the economy, and perhaps for different reasons, I agree with Morgan. The greed of the people has pushed house prices to a comical level, and loom like they are going to go higher even with the latest rate rise, however, a huge fall is inevitable. Those people who have overstreched themselves to get their first foot on the housing ladder will either find their investment is only worth half what they paid for it, and will be unable to move for the next 25 years due to negative equity, or else they may lose their homes as the banks take them back, and re-sell them at half the price to the armies of first time buyers who cannot afford to buy at the moment.

    Harry Lewis, London
    Dafydd, perhaps you have some BTLs, are worried you may loose money should the crash occur. Morgan, excellent stuff. I am deeply saddened for a whole generation that is currently priced out and will never own a house. Oh yes, Dafydd, they could buy a rat infested, druggie surrounded one bed flat. But how do you raise a family in that? I am sickened that some people feel it is in order to have holiday homes and a few buy to lets, while others have nothing, and are forced to pay the mortgages or these greedy people. Or be priced out of their home town by rich southerners. ! I totally blame NuLabour. Why are the giving tax relief to BTL landlords?

    Robert Casement
    Very interesting John. I liked your point about property non-ownership as it is really the banks and other lenders that are the "property owning democracy" in the UK. I'd go even further and say that property ownership is an illusion. Nobody really owns their house, ownership means the right to freely change, gift, destroy or dispose of an item with complete freedom. Ownership also implied that you are allowed to keep the item without further payment to anybody. None of these tests can be passed with a property item in Britain even if you have nominally "paid" for it. Logic and commonsense tell anybody that a house is worth what it costs to build and, after it is built, begins to wane as the property "wears out". But not in the "funny" world of houses it seems where a flat that costs £30,000 to build sells here for £300,000. Whose pocket does the £270,000 go into? Everybody also knows that ten years ago things were much as they are today... so why does property cost three times more? The only explanation is that the "property fairy" has waved her magic wand - and what the property fairy gives the property fairy can take away. We are indeed about to experience a "correction" but a correction of biblical proportions. Does anybody in Britain (or even in the world) believe that inflation is "under control" or even that the government has any influence upon it at all? Inflation is on the way and with it higher interest rates. Nobody but the top few percent of Britain's workers could even finance a £200,000 mortgage with base rates at a modest (historically) 12%. The best analysis is a return to historically reasonable valuations (a drop in values to half present ones probably won't be enough). In over-supplied property markets prices gravitate to building costs... when building stops until supply-driven economics force more to be built. But that's enough. I'm happily renting for about 50% of what a mortgage would cost on my "£350,000 flat" and am happy to trade my "dead money" for a good night's sleep.

    Dafydd of Sydney
    Your style of discussion remains the same, you skirt around the subject with many superfluous details, and on different levels trying to appeal to a sympathetic chord. Anyway. How much more would you have lost if you paid rent, butt? Buying and selling is a matter of timing sorry but you seem to have got your timing wrong. When did the government have the opportunity to take all land into public ownership? Do you imagine it would have won a lot of votes for them? They sold all the council houses for short term gain. So why would they retain land title. Here they raise so much in tax when you buy and sell property is there no tax in Wales????? Who can you trust in government? (I was born in 1948 and realised it was time to find somewhere else to live, where the sun shines and the people are friendly and you can make money if you work and get some support if for some reason you don't. It's a long way away though butt!)

    Morgan of Varteg
    I do not require that others than myself should obtain and pay for my home.

    What I deprecate is the excessive greed shown by people, not so much today, as the die is cast, but those who took advantage of the ease at which finance could be obtained in the recent past, and which allowed the purchase of so called desirable properties in desirable or preferred areas, leading to the towed along price hikes as they in turn sold on to others in their wake, and at greatly inflated prices. The whole problem is ongoing.

    A part solution was in the hands of the government when they had the opportunity to take ALL land into public ownership, this could easily have thwarted the escalation in land values that have reached preposturous proportions at this time. Small plots of land fetching sums that were only available to town centre commercial developments a few years ago.

    No my friend in Sydney, it is down to plain and simple greed, brought about by the easy laissez faire society dreamed up and promulgated by the Tory administrations of the late 70s to mid 90s.

    I don't need any lessons in social management from down under, I have lived too long under successive failed governments and had to suffer the problems caused by them all my life. I was a child under bombing in the 40s, a youth under the period of acclimatisation of the nation to loss of empire and world standing, suffered the pangs of mass unemployment in the late 60s, and the disruption of life brought about by boom and bust economic policies throughout it all - trying to make ends meet when laid off through bad weather, trying to catch up financially in the very short periods of good weather, and endeavouring to make a good family life for those around me.

    When the bust does occur, as it seems it will in the not too distant future, I will not have the guilt on my conscience, that I put my house on the market in order to capitalise at the expense of some poor person trying to desperately to get a foot on the housing ladder. I have never sold a house for more than I spent on purchase plus the cost of refurbishment. Nor have I had any grant from the state in order to accopmlish the works done to my houses. Only three in fact, including the one I live in now. My first purchased in 1971. I don't buy and sell short order to make gain. I fail to see why people do so - the only reason for such activity can be GREED. If accurately calculated, I reckon I have actually lost on the sale of the first two. So I put my money where my mouth is and stand by my principles.

    Dafydd in Sydney
    Perhaps you could put some energy into formulating a remedy for the situations you describe. Who do you think should pay for a house for you and your neighbors? Is it not a good thing to provide a home for your family and yourself? Should the country or indeed rachmann supply your home and you just pay what you can afford this month as rent? When so much money is tied up in property surely the assets value should rise. Why should there be a crash????? To skirt around a subject making innacurate, emotive statements is simple enough but trying to solve problems may even make a difference.



    Do you agree or disagree with Morgan's view?

    Your name, surname and location:
    (All these details MUST be included for publication)

    Comment:


    Your Email Address


    The BBC reserves the right to select and edit comments. Find out how to make sure your comments are published. To submit a larger contribution or if you require a response please contact us.



  • More from this section
    More from Your Say
    Message board

    take a look

    animation Have your say
    Add an event
    Add a quiz
    Get the newsletter


    Related links
    News

    take a look

    Train
    Beat the jams!
    Plan your journey with our traffic cams, live road updates, train times and more.

    Singer Amy Wadge
    Enjoy yourself!
    Plan a great night out, check out the music scene or have some fun and games.

    Web Guide
    Get surfing!
    Want to know more about South East Wales? Check out our Web Guide to people, places and activities.




    About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy