|
|
 |
Dr
Jeffrey John has been approved by the Queen for the job - one of
the most senior roles in the Church of England - and was welcomed
today at a press conference led by the Right Rev Christopher Herbert,
Bishop of St Albans.
Dr
John's nomination last May as Bishop of Reading provoked strong
criticism from conservative evangelicals.
He
was eventually persuaded to withdraw from the post by the Archbishop
of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams.
Dr
John also takes on the role of Rector of the Cathedral and Abbey
Church of St Albans.
Dr
John, who earlier said he was "honoured" to be appointed,
said in a press conference after the appointment was confirmed that
he backed the idea of same-sex unions.
"I
support the state and the Church offering gay people a framework
of living their lives. I hope that ultimately the Church will be
able to bless that kind of relationship too."
This is an outrageous appointment - it is a backdoor attempt
to make homosexuality mainstream in the Church of England  |
|
David
Virtue
|
He
acknowledged the issue of gay weddings was like "red rag to
bulls" to conservatives.
Dr
John - who has a long term partner - said he wouldn't be attempting
to do anything in the Abbey "which goes against the canons
of the Church of England".
The
first openly gay Anglican bishop, Canon Gene Robinson, was confirmed
as Bishop of New Hampshire in the US last month.
But
his consecration in November threatened to split the worldwide Anglican
Church.
And
traditionalists have warned that following Bishop Robinson's ordination,
this latest move would take the break-up of the Anglican Church
a step further.
David
Virtue, the evangelical commentator who runs the influential web
site Virtuosity, said: "This is an outrageous appointment.
It is a backdoor attempt to make homosexuality mainstream in the
Church of England."
But
liberals in the St Albans diocese are believed to have been lobbying
for months for Dr John, 51, to replace Dean Lewis, who moved to
Christ Church, Oxford, last October.
'Unfortunate
timing'
The
Bishop of St Albans, the Rt Rev Christopher Herbert, welcomed Dr
John's appointment.
He
said: "Jeffrey John has a well deserved reputation for being
a good, caring pastor.
"He
is an intelligent, courageous priest who will follow a long line
of superb Deans of St Albans and will bring to the Abbey a wide
range of gifts.
"He
is a man of prayer, a preacher and teacher of real authority and
grace."
Dr
John said that he was not expecting a repeat of the "storm"
over his appointment as Bishop of Reading last year, which "frightened
the horses".
 |
| St
Albans Cathedral |
His
nomination caused a bitter row within the Church of England and
eventually led to him saying he feared his consecration would damage
the "unity of the Church".
"I
suspect that a good deal of the storm last summer was to do with
the timing. It was unfortunate that it happened at the same time
as events in New Hampshire," he said.
Dr
John has been in his current post as Canon Chancellor and Bishop's
Adviser for Ministry in the Diocese of Southwark since 1997.
A date
is yet to be set for when he takes up his new role but a ceremony
is expected to take place this autumn.
Backing
Meanwhile,
a retired canon of St Albans Cathedral has given her backing to
the appointment.
Patience
Purchase says people will accept Dr Jeffrey John and he won't use
his position as a campaigning platform.
She
likens his appointment to the controversy when women priests were
introduced:
"When
people met a woman priest and saw her functioning, they said 'I
thought I wouldn't like it, I thought it would feel all wrong, but
actually it's OK.
"I
think this is what will happen with Jeffrey John" she added.
"He's not going to use the Cathedral as some kind of campaigning
platform anyhow. He's not that sort of person."
What
do you think about the Dr Jeffery John's appointment? Send us your
views.

| Hilary
Munro, Caterham |
Tuesday,
01-Feb-2005 15:53:07 GMT |
 |
| I
don't see why homosexuality is such a 'sin' in the eyes of the
church that they cannot give homosexuals equal rights. If sin
is all the same in the eyes of God, surely all men and women
ordained by the church have committed the same amount of sin
found intolerable by God, but just like homosexuals have given
thier lives and hearts to God. The Anglican church is simply
trying to keep traditions and rules that no longer are applicable
to todays society, just the same as most of the rules in Leviticus
now days we completely ignore. If the church is going to be
so addament that these rules are kept, then they have to be
consistant! |
| gwil,
hatfield |
Friday,
16-Jul-2004 08:57:18 BST |
 |
| I'm
not sure who i hate more, the christian church or the BNP. At
least the BNP are up-front about their bigotry! the bible has
been written and re-writen over the years to justify slavery,
killing disabled people and keeping women down - it's social
control! any gay person who actually chooses to be in that institution
needs their head looking at!!! :o) |
| Pat,
Watford |
Sunday,
13-Jun-2004 17:06:37 BST |
 |
| I
thought Jesus preached tolerance. Wheredoes it say that Jesus
said homosexuals were bad people? If he can forgive prostitutes
and other "sinners" and not homosexuals then he was a hippocrite
and my faith in Jesus has gone down the drain. |
| Clair,
St Albans |
Wednesday,
21-Apr-2004 13:02:59 BST |
 |
| Yes
I agree Kevin. The Anglican congregation is not shrinking because
the church is ignoring the clear teaching of the Bible but because
the church appears to be full of narrow minded bigots that many
people living in the modern world are happy to keep away from
- while respecting their right to think that way of course!
We just don't have to agree with them! |
| Kevin,
Welwyn Garden City |
Wednesday,
21-Apr-2004 12:59:20 BST |
 |
| Sure
if you think homosexuality is a sin (which I don't by the way)
Then doesn't Christianity teach forgiveness as well? Surely
tolerance, love, inclusiveness and the understanding and respect
of other people and their life choices is a more Christian way
to live? |
| Dan,
Hatfield |
Wednesday,
21-Apr-2004 10:56:23 BST |
 |
| Having
been through the contoversy associated with Dr John whilst in
Reading, I can't believe that the Church of England would appoint
him to this position. The views expressed by the churches in
Reading were not 'NOT ON MY DOORSTEP!', they were expressing
the concern that it is against bible teaching to appoint someone
of his tendancies. I'm not gay bashing, as in the eyes of God
all sins are equal, but the bible is quite clear. I am surprised
that there has not been any recorded reaction from the local
church in St Albans and the Diocese. What do the vicars and
parishioners of the area think? |
| Mrs
Doreen Davis, Bedford |
Tuesday,
20-Apr-2004 07:54:02 BST |
 |
| I
think this appointment is a sad declaration of the state of
the world today. It goes against all the teaching of the Bible
and is an abomination to God! and will be the downfall of the
Church. |
| Ernie,
Bedford |
Tuesday,
20-Apr-2004 08:45:24 BST |
 |
| No
wonder as a church, the Anglian congregation is shrinking, as
the church ignores the clear teaching of the Bible. The Bible
has stood the test of time so why does Dr John think the word
should be ignored to suit his own personal preferences. A decent
man would resign his membership of the leadership if he wants
to persue his gay leanings. |
|