World champion Ronnie O'Sullivan has taken a break from snooker
Ronnie O'Sullivan to 'take some time off' from snooker
World champion Ronnie O'Sullivan is to "take some time off" from competitive snooker after refusing to sign the official players' contract.
The 36-year-old announced the news on his official website.
Ronnie O'Sullivan“I still want to play snooker and visit those places around the world such as China where snooker is adored”
His statement read: "I have not signed the players' contract as I feel the contract is too onerous."
Barry Hearn confirmed the news on the World Snooker website, saying the body "simply can't make exceptions for one player's individual requirements".
He added: "Ronnie is at liberty to enter our events and play on the circuit at any time, once he agrees to abide by the rules of the players' contract."
Last month, O'Sullivan accused Hearn of "blackmailing" players and criticised the World Snooker chairman's controversial revamped 50-week, 27-event tour, which will take full effect next year.
By refusing to sign the players' contract, O'Sullivan has made himself ineligible to participate in any World Snooker-sanctioned event - including Premier League Snooker, a tournament he has won for the past two years.
O'Sullivan's world championship wins
- 2001: 18-14 v John Higgins
- 2004: 18-8 v Graeme Dott
- 2008: 18-8 v Ali Carter
- 2012: 18-11 v Ali Carter
O'Sullivan still intends to play snooker away from the official circuit, however.
"I still want to play snooker and visit those places around the world such as China where snooker is enthusiastically received and adored," he said in his statement.
"I hope to remain involved in the sport in some way in the future."
O'Sullivan clinched his fourth world championship with an 18-11 victory over Ali Carter in May, and afterwards spoke of his desire to take a six-month sabbatical from the sport.
He has recently spoken out over the changes Hearn has made to the sport's schedule, accusing the World Snooker boss of "blackmailing" players, and last month he told BBC Sport of his concerns .
In a statement issued on Thursday, WPBSA Chairman Jason Ferguson said he wanted to counter the "misconception that players are being 'forced' into playing certain events."
WPBSA Chairman Jason Ferguson“Ronnie O'Sullivan is free to sign the contract at any time during the season”
The statement went on to add that, "The contract is there to protect the players' income derived from the tour, and the sport as a whole. Once players have signed the contract they are free to choose which events they wish to play in.
"It is the WPBSA's duty to ensure that all of the players are treated equally and therefore it is our belief that all players should sign the same contract.
"We do not believe it would be in the interest of the membership as a whole if one player was allowed a different contract which could give that player additional appearance money. The World Snooker Tour is expanding rapidly and consistently on a global basis and it is set to grow further. We are looking for the support of the players as a whole in order to assist this growth.
"Ronnie O'Sullivan of course is free to sign the contract at any time during the season which would make him eligible to play in World Snooker events, but it is important to note that signing the players' contract does not in itself compel any player to enter any World Snooker tournaments."
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Snooker
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Watch video Super-charged sport
BBC Travel has a go at an unusual activity which once held the world record for fastest ball speed
-
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~54~RS~)

Comment number 19.
John Young9th June 2012 - 10:25
Does the contract prohibit players from playing non World Snooker tournaments, and does it prevent them doing other exhibitions etc?
Link to this (Comment number 19)
Comment number 18.
greg9th June 2012 - 9:43
I understand people who say that snooker wont be the same without ronnie, but to be honest I am glad he's gone in my eyes the sport is a better place without him, he is useless as a role model for the sport because he can't be bothered to go to many of the tournaments, yes i know he is a very talented player, i think the sport will be better without him even though there will be a loss of viewers.
Link to this (Comment number 18)
Comment number 17.
Gordon Reid8th June 2012 - 10:22
Not much point in watching the Snooker without Ronnie O'Sullivan. The other players must me loving this. They might have a chance of winning something for a change. When Ronnie is up for it nobody has a chance.
Link to this (Comment number 17)
Comment number 16.
exxyeddie7th June 2012 - 18:45
Poor Ronald!! Its less about travelling and more about making money. Small tournament in Germany, get beat in semi's and win 10 grand for a weeks work or exhibition weekend in China for 50 grand. Fair play - Ronnies got nothing to prove on a snooker table but don't be fooled by the travelling excuse (China is a lucrative market that both he and Hendry will exploit). Shame but understandable.
Link to this (Comment number 16)
Comment number 15.
Seedy7th June 2012 - 17:23
Like many people, wasn't aware there were any specific 'other issues' here, although appreciate there quite often are! What's your expertise here, or are you just a dedicated supporter of the sport?
Link to this (Comment number 15)
Comments 5 of 19