Murrayfield could be renamed for right price - Scottish Rugby
Scottish Rugby is seeking sponsorship that could see Murrayfield renamed.
SRU chief executive Mark Dodson told BBC Scotland that it could generate millions of pounds a year.
"The single biggest piece of our inventory is our national stadium," he said. "We would like to see if we can monetise that.
"It would be crazy for us not to look at using our single biggest piece of inventory to drive revenue. We want to get the right price for it."
Increasing revenue for Scottish rugby was one of the aims laid out in Dodson's four-year strategic plan, which was released in June.
And he believes renaming Murrayfield should be explored.
"We're looking at trying to bring money in across our inventory," he added. "We want to be sympathetic about how we do it.
"It depends on how you pitch and what goes in the package, but it's millions of pounds a year."
Renaming stadiums has proven to be controversial - Newcastle fans were unhappy with the decision to rename St James' Park - but it can also be lucrative.
Emirates paid Arsenal £100m to have its name on the club's stadium for 15 years, and also recently paid £5m for the naming rights for the Sir Chris Hoy arena - the new velodrome for the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow - for the next 10 years.
The Ireland football and rugby teams play at the Aviva Stadium and South Africa at the Coca-Cola Stadium.
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Rugby Union
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Working Lives Ecuador
The BBC's Michelle Fleury meets five very different people who live and work in Quito
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~34~RS~)

Comment number 120.
SouthSeaIslander31st October 2012 - 23:40
Seriously? People are getting upset about this? It's the name of a stadium. If that's all it takes for Scottish rugby to lose your support, then you have no right to call yourself a supporter in the first place.
I would have the state of your team and what that's doing to your reputation is more concerning.
Link to this (Comment number 120)
Comment number 119.
Mightyqueens31st October 2012 - 14:06
82. dantheman917
Check out the England elite squad and recent replacements: 3 South Africans, 3 New Zealanders and one each from Australia, Samoa and USA.
People in glass houses.......?
Link to this (Comment number 119)
Comment number 118.
Come on Wales31st October 2012 - 11:05
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNu8XDBSn10
apologies about the intro (30 secs) but this will help the .... what is the countries debate :-)
Link to this (Comment number 118)
Comment number 117.
shearlam31st October 2012 - 9:46
They need to get Scottish Power to get the rights then everyone will be happy :)
Link to this (Comment number 117)
Comment number 116.
Waz31st October 2012 - 9:38
But thinking about it commercially because cash is king and can do a lot if invested wisely (but I don't like stadiums being renamed especially iconic venues) maybe something similar to the Qantas Wallabies or the St George Reds might prove less controversial ...? The "Irn Bru Jocks ... Made from Girders" has a ring to it perhaps ...
Link to this (Comment number 116)
Comments 5 of 120