Olympic Stadium confirmed on 2015 Rugby World Cup shortlist
The Olympic Stadium and five Premier League football grounds have been confirmed as potential match venues for the 2015 Rugby World Cup.
Just three of the 17 shortlisted are rugby venues: Gloucester's Kingsholm, the Millennium Stadium and Twickenham.
England's biggest club rugby ground - Leicester Tigers' Welford Road - has not been shortlisted.
The home grounds of Manchester United, Newcastle, Sunderland, Aston Villa and Southampton are all on the shortlist.
The Amex Stadium in Brighton, Bristol City's Ashton Gate, Pride Park in Derby, Coventry's Ricoh Arena, Elland Road in Leeds and Stadium MK in Milton Keynes are also included, as well as Wembley.
RWC 2015 qualifiers to date
- Argentina
- Australia
- England
- France
- Ireland
- Italy
- New Zealand
- Scotland
- Samoa
- South Africa
- Tonga
- Wales
The city of Leicester is still represented by the King Power Stadium, which has a capacity of more than 32,000 and tournament organisers believe it has more suitable off-field facilities than Welford Road.
However, in a statement, the Tigers said they were "hugely disappointed" by their omission.
"Welford Road has hosted many major occasions over the years, including visits from South Africa, Australia and Argentina national teams in recent seasons. It is home to the best-supported and most successful club in the history of the professional game in this country and, as such, we believe is worthy of Rugby World Cup status," chairman Peter Tom said.
"That the organisers of RWC2015 do not think this an appropriate venue for its fixtures is disappointing and confusing - both for the professional club game in this country and for its supporters."
The final list of 10 to 12 venues will be finalised early in 2013 after the tournament match schedule has been formulated. The pool draw is being held on 3 December in London.
The tournament's organisers, England Rugby 2015, must sell 2.9 million tickets to cover the £80m guarantee owed to the International Rugby Board.
Andy Cosslett, ER2015 chairman, said: "We are confident that, with the venues selected, we will be able to reach our target of having up to 2.9 million tickets available - opening up the tournament to more people than ever before and in turn delivering the biggest and best Rugby World Cup there has ever been."
Rugby Football Union chief executive Ian Ritchie said Leicester, like all clubs, would benefit in other ways from England staging the Rugby World Cup - but pointed out that the ground did not meet the necessary criteria to stage matches.
He added: "I would be very disappointed as well. They do a great job, they are a fantastic club. I can understand their disappointment but I think you've got to look at what were the facts of the review and the audit that went on."
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Rugby Union
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Watch video Art in the shadow of Hitler
Why Hitler’s propaganda war against modernism dominated German art
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~19~RS~)

Comment number 157.
Stamphouse10th October 2012 - 21:05
If the RFU have only 2 English rugby grounds worthy to hold World Cup fixtures, how on earth were they awarded the World Cup Tournament in the first place
Link to this (Comment number 157)
Comment number 156.
panamaroadotahuhu210th October 2012 - 17:54
King
You're probably right. I would favour a switch so that it would be Italy in 2023 and SA in 2027 - bearing in mind the Italians have not had it yet. How's about Argentina, even?
Link to this (Comment number 156)
Comment number 155.
SteveWalshsDubiousDecision10th October 2012 - 17:28
Think the tournament is too big to go back to NZ alone and Aus won't want to share. Equally Ireland may find an £80m price tag a little steep as well. It's weird to think that the RFU as one of/the richest union is finding it hard going to meet the requirements of the IRB. What hope for the rest?
My own predictions though are SA in 2023 and It in 2027.
Link to this (Comment number 155)
Comment number 154.
Anglophone10th October 2012 - 14:35
It's probably more the case that trying to hold a world cup involving more than one S. Hemisphere country would involve intercontinental travel. In the the NH it's easier to spread out.
The real factor though is that in the NH you have two big players and three smaller players who tend to tart themselves to the highest bidder when RWC bids are made thus ensuring some home games and some cash!
Link to this (Comment number 154)
Comment number 153.
panamaroadotahuhu210th October 2012 - 14:20
Kapai, King.
I suppose it depends on what the focus is making money,growing the sport elsewhere,or trying to focus on areas where the tournament will create a big buzz. The three factors don't always overlap. I think it would be a shame if, say, the whole of Ireland couldn't host the Tournament. I do not expect it to return to NZ for a long time - if ever. We have to learn how to win away!
Link to this (Comment number 153)
Comments 5 of 157