Olympics funding: Some Team GB sports told to expect cuts
A number of Great Britain's Olympic teams could lose their funding, despite the government recently announcing investment of £508m through to 2016.
Athletes or sports that are not expected to reach the Rio Games in 2016 will not receive any money.
Hugh Robertson Sports minister
“We will fund any sport where we think there is a realistic chance of a medal in Rio or in the 2020 Games”
Sports like handball and volleyball, which relied on host-nation places to compete in London, could be affected.
"There's no point funding sports that are not going to qualify," said sports minister Hugh Robertson.
The policy is known as 'no compromise'. Supporters say it is the fairest and most accountable way of channelling public finances into developing elite level athletes for competition.
Critics, however, insist that investment is needed to develop Britain's less popular sports to allow Britain to compete at international level.
"We will fund any sport where we think there is a realistic chance of a medal in Rio or in the 2020 Games. The base cutoff is if a sport does not qualify for an Olympics, that is very important," clarified Robertson.
"But remember that even if there are sports that don't attract funding, they can still get funding through Sport England and so on to develop their talent into a position where they will qualify for a Games in the future."
The British Volleyball Federation, who lost men's coach Harry Brokking on Tuesday through not being able to fund his salary, received over £3.5m from UK Sport in the build-up to London but did not meet all their performance targets.
And rower Katherine Grainger, who won a gold medal at London 2012 in the women's double sculls and has three other Olympic silver medals, insisted that elite sports funding must be based on an athlete or team's ability to succeed.
"This is accountable money, public money," she said. "It has to be based on performance and it always has been.
"Every athlete comes in knowing that if they perform there's more chance of the support and the funding being there. If they don't, they're not going to get that. So no-one's surprised if the better they are the more support they'll get."
Baroness Sue Campbell, chair of UK Sport, said: "Investing in sport in an expensive business - world class success is expensive. We are investing the viewers' money, whether its coming from the government or Lottery.
"To invest large amounts of public money in people who quite frankly aren't going to get there is not good investment."
CommentsJump to comments pagination
Comment number 236.Hoppers
16th August 2012 - 14:12
Comment number 235.gareth
16th August 2012 - 10:38
Comment number 234.photo762
16th August 2012 - 8:04
Comment number 233.Nick S
15th August 2012 - 22:10
Comment number 232.emsti
15th August 2012 - 20:44
Comment number 231.Elscotto
15th August 2012 - 17:57
Comment number 230.U14972306
15th August 2012 - 17:06
Comment number 229.justpassingtime
15th August 2012 - 17:03
Comment number 228.GeorgeBernardRaw
15th August 2012 - 17:00
Comment number 227.afterglowlover
15th August 2012 - 16:49
Comment number 226.suzyp
15th August 2012 - 16:38
Comment number 225.The_Boss
15th August 2012 - 16:24
Comment number 224.Old One Eye
15th August 2012 - 16:06
Comment number 223.Kif
15th August 2012 - 15:20
Comment number 222.steamin625
15th August 2012 - 15:05
Comment number 221.Steven Arnold
15th August 2012 - 14:38
Comment number 220.Ian182
15th August 2012 - 14:24
Comment number 219.suzyp
15th August 2012 - 14:15
Comment number 218.maxmerit
15th August 2012 - 14:09
Comment number 217.hackabusi
15th August 2012 - 14:08