Changes made to Grand National
Grand National: Safety changes announced after official review
A number of changes have been announced for the Grand National following a safety review, but the field size is to stay at a maximum of 40.
An official inquiry was launched after the deaths of two horses in April.
The start will be moved 90 yards closer to the first fence, while measures will also be taken to stop horses getting caught up in the starting tape.
Expert analysis
"I think the start has been a problem for a long-time. In 1993, the race was voided because of problems there. The way the start is lined up currently, and the build-up of tension at the start, makes it very difficult if you are on an animal that clearly is tense. The changes to the start are a very good idea and don't change the nature of the race. If there are still problems, the next option would be to reduce the field size."
The Becher's Brook landing zone is being levelled further, while there will be a review of fence designs.
The changes to the start may slow the speed the first fence is approached at, while moving the start further away from the crowd will reduce noise that can distract the horses.
On field size, Aintree Racecourse and the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) said they believe the course and fences can accommodate a maximum of 40 runners, but will "continue to monitor" the issue.
The charity World Horse Welfare, while welcoming most of the changes, said it was disappointed the field size was not being reduced.
Following the review, the start will now be moved forward 90 yards, reducing the race to four miles and three-and-a-half furlongs, from four-and-a-half miles.
In addition, the starter's rostrum will be put in a position that allows a "no-go zone" to stop horses that false start getting on top of the tape.
Jamie Stier, director of race day operations and regulation for the BHA, said: "It is possible that a more controlled environment at the start, along with reducing the distance between the start and the first fence, could have the effect of reducing the early speed of the race. If this were to be the case, it would be an added benefit."
Did you know?
Twenty horses have died in races over Grand National fences since 2001. Ten have died in the race itself in the last 12 years
Source: BHA
In April's event, Cheltenham Gold Cup winner Synchronised unseated rider Tony McCoy on the way to the starting area and ran loose in a chaotic opening which was delayed and also featured a number of restarts. He later broke his leg in a fall and was put down.
The fence design project at Aintree will last three years and focus on using materials other than the timber and protective rubber padding that make up the central frame at present. Fence heights will remain unchanged.
Becher's Brook will "undergo further levelling of the wider landing zone, correcting the settlement which occurred following work carried out in 2011", according to the review.
The other horse to die in the 2012 race, According to Pete, may have been injured when brought down by On His Own, who could have been unsighted at the fence, or when another horse, Weird Al, collided with him as he got up.
Fences four, five and 13 will also have their landing areas levelled to "smooth out undulations".
Other measures include £100,000 being invested in irrigation to produce "the safest jumping ground possible" and a new bypass and pen around fence four to catch riderless horses.
John Baker, who runs Aintree Racecourse as part of his role as North West regional director for Jockey Club Racecourses, said: "In recent years, we have made significant investments in safety and believe today's announcement demonstrates we will continue to do so whilst preserving the unique character and appeal of the nation's favourite race."
World Horse Welfare chief executive Roly Owers welcomed "Aintree's demonstrated commitment to making the course safer", highlighting the work to fences.
However, he said: "We are disappointed that they have not proposed reducing the size of the field, although we note that they are keeping this under review.
Becher's Brook
- Becher's Brook is jumped twice in the Grand National as the sixth and 22nd fence
- The approach height is only 4ft 10in (1.47m), but the drop is between 5ft 2in and 5ft 8in
"While there is clearly no magic formula here, changes need to be made to significantly reduce the faller rate which will reduce the number of injuries, fatalities and loose horses which pose risks to themselves and others on the course.
"We believe the single most effective way of doing this is to trial a reduction in the field size - say for three years. "
In April, only 15 of the 40 horses finished the race and the two deaths led to questions about the National's future from animal welfare groups.
Several alterations had been made to the course for 2012 after a previous review following the fatal injuries suffered by Ornais and Dooleys Gate in 2011.
According to the BHA, 20 horses have died in races over Grand National fences since 2001 and 10 have lost their lives in the race itself in the past 12 years.
Three horses also died in the 1998 race, while the opening day of the 2000 meeting was marred by four deaths.
Neptune Collonges wins Grand National - race in full
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Horse Racing
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Watch video Super-charged sport
BBC Travel has a go at an unusual activity which once held the world record for fastest ball speed
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~39~RS~)

Comment number 107.
david lee22nd September 2012 - 12:30
also, you can't really say based on one race if changes have been good/bad- there are freak occurances in racing and one race is far too small a sample- as is three- any statistician would tell you that, you need a longer period (and to consider the results of other races over the same fences). yes fences need to be constructed more safely with paramount important given to horses' line of sight
Link to this (Comment number 107)
Comment number 106.
david lee22nd September 2012 - 12:17
an insider's pov: paradoxically dropping the height of the fences can make things worse, more speed. I agree with the general drift of comments, need to keep the ground softish, do other things to minimise early speed, balding is spot on- the start is a disgrace, horses get nervous, start needs to be more fluid, i would start them on the home straight- the turn would eliminate the dash for the 1st
Link to this (Comment number 106)
Comment number 105.
Spanish Steps21st September 2012 - 23:06
Good/fast ground with smaller jumps encourages horses to jump faster and creates high impact falls more commonly seen in hurdling (RIP Golden Cygnet). I agree that the softer the ground the better, it slows the horses down so they jump more carefully. Reducing the size of the jumps further won't help. Risks can be minimized but as with any horse sport there will always be tragic accidents.
Link to this (Comment number 105)
Comment number 104.
eowenthe brave21st September 2012 - 14:07
Many years ago, Princess Anne's horse Doublet whilst on exercise with her by accident broke a leg and was put down. Most unfortunate but it happens. Would you ban riding? Zara Phillip's horse Tsunami incurred a fatal accident at Pau whilst competing, would you ban eventing? Horses have a delicate skeleton and their bones break easily.The logical conclusion: ban all equestrian sport? Of course not.
Link to this (Comment number 104)
Comment number 103.
David Richerby21st September 2012 - 13:11
@Kingfisherphil (95) "Seat belts and ABS in cars has made people less careful and more at risk." You're aware that the numbers of deaths and serious injuries on the roads have fallen dramatically since seatbelts and ABS were introduced, even though there are far more cars on the road now? That would tend to militate against your argument just a little.
Link to this (Comment number 103)
Comments 5 of 107