Theo Walcott signs new long-term Arsenal contract
Theo Walcott has signed a new three-and-a-half-year contract with Arsenal, worth £100,000 a week.
The England forward rejected a five-year offer worth £75,000 a week in August and could have left on a free transfer at the end of the season.
Talks stalled after Walcott turned down that proposal but progress was made in the last two weeks.
Arsenal top scorers this season
| PL | FA Cup | League Cup | Europe | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Theo Walcott |
8 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
14 |
|
Lukas Podolski |
6 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
|
Olivier Giroud |
6 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
|
Santi Cazorla |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
Gervinho |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
"What's important now is for the team to realise its potential and win trophies," said Walcott.
"I have made it clear from the start that I wanted to stay at Arsenal so I am pleased we have agreed a deal that everyone is happy with.
"Thanks to everyone for their continued support, especially the manager, everyone at the club and most importantly the fans."
Walcott, Arsenal's top scorer, has also been rewarded with a £3m signing-on bonus.
He signed the deal at the club's London Colney training ground on Friday afternoon, ending months of speculation about his future.
Arsene Wenger spoke of his relief that 23-year-old Walcott has committed his future to Arsenal.
"Theo's contract extension now gives us a strong nucleus of ambitious young players who have committed to the club and want to be successful with us as a group," said the Arsenal manager.
"Theo is a strong player and also a great person, and the combination of his ability and pace always make him such a valuable asset either from the flanks or down the middle.
"He joined us as a 16-year-old and since then has developed very well to become an extremely important player for both Arsenal and England."
Arsenal lawyers and the player's advisors spent all of Thursday in negotiations before agreeing on most issues by 19:00 GMT.
The club had tabled a five-year contract worth a reported £90,000 a week, while Walcott favoured the three-and-a-half-year deal on a salary above £100,000.
But a consensus was reached and the legal formalities - including an agreement on the complex area of image rights - were completed on Friday morning.
Walcott was upset with manager Arsene Wenger's decision to use him mainly as a substitute earlier in the season, but he has since regained a regular starting place.
It marks the end of another protracted contract saga involving the north London club, yet this time they are keeping their player.
Walcott scores at Euro 2012
Last summer Arsenal lost Robin van Persie to Manchester United as he entered the last year of his deal, and in 2011 they sold Samir Nasri to Manchester City when he was in the same situation.
Mathieu Flamini was in an identical position to Walcott in 2008, and he chose to see out his final six months before joining AC Milan.
Arsenal also saw Cesc Fabregas move to Barcelona following lengthy speculation about his future, although the Spaniard had longer left on his contract.
But Walcott has instead committed his future to the team who signed him from Southampton as a 16-year-old in 2006.
Arsenal rebuffed a bid for him from Manchester City towards the end of the last summer's transfer window, while Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester United had also expressed an interest.
Arsenal have now agreed new deals with Walcott, Jack Wilshere, Aaron Ramsey, Kieran Gibbs, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and Carl Jenkinson as Wenger seeks to build his squad around a British core.
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Football
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Winning business
Why trying to become a successful entrepreneur has never been more fashionable
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~28~RS~)

Comment number 465.
Col20th January 2013 - 12:15
If TW is worth £100k p/wk then that Dutch player is worth everything Man U are paying him. A bit more ambition and he could have stayed at Arsenal. Since TW would no longer be able to hold the club to ransom, he would have signed the original £75k contract.
Link to this (Comment number 465)
Comment number 464.
Matt20th January 2013 - 10:23
if its 3.5 years, seems to me the next contract negotiation should also start now given anything less than 2 years is no longer enough.
Link to this (Comment number 464)
Comment number 463.
Chris19th January 2013 - 23:49
If it weren't for recent history in losing players Walcott couldn't have played this hold-out game. He knows Arsenal can't be seen to lose another, so even though he isn't a major loss he can get away with this.
Fact is, he has never lived up to his potential. Let's hope he does so now.
Link to this (Comment number 463)
Comment number 462.
Pimlican19th January 2013 - 23:45
Predicable nonsense, sell von presie, keeps walcott. samll time thinking for a 'big' club.
Link to this (Comment number 462)
Comment number 461.
Joelang9219th January 2013 - 22:21
People up in arms about footballers wages. If you watch football or follow it in any way then stop. You're the ones paying them. The day you pay to get a surgery side seat or pay to go watch a war is the day doctors and soldiers will be paid more. I'm sure if taxes were raised to raise their wages you'd complain. Plus footballers are fairly low paid compared to other sportspeople.
Link to this (Comment number 461)
Comments 5 of 465