Premier League clubs agree new cost controls
The 20 Premier League clubs have agreed, in principle, to introduce radical new cost controls.
There are two main proposals on the table - a break-even rule and a cap on the amount clubs can increase their wage bills by each season.
Club chief executives have now been asked to produce detailed plans for exactly how these proposals will work.
These rules would mark a major change for the clubs, which made cumulative losses of £361m in 2010-11.
Champions Manchester City, for example, made a £97.9m loss in their latest set of results, which were revealed last Friday.
City and Fulham are the only clubs opposed to any spending controls, BBC Sport understands. However, any new Premier League rule requires the approval of only 14 of the 20 clubs in order to be introduced.
With the Premier League's new three-year television deals expected to break through the £5bn barrier from 2013, momentum is growing to find a way of preventing the majority of that cash going straight to players and agents.
There have now been six meetings of top-flight chairmen where cost controls have been discussed without any concrete decisions being made.
The next meeting will be on 6 February.
CommentsJump to comments pagination
Comment number 370.Ruffshank Dufflebonk
20th December 2012 - 18:01
Comment number 369.Aussie Jack
20th December 2012 - 14:33
Comment number 368.Ruffshank Dufflebonk
20th December 2012 - 12:40
Comment number 367.xwarex SCFC
19th December 2012 - 21:12
Comment number 366.TwistedWhisper
19th December 2012 - 20:52
Comment number 365.Ruffshank Dufflebonk
19th December 2012 - 19:15
Comment number 364.baribus
19th December 2012 - 15:47
Comment number 363.XTempest
19th December 2012 - 15:18
Comment number 362.King Red
19th December 2012 - 14:20
Comment number 361.EverySingleGoal
19th December 2012 - 14:07
Comment number 360.tangled webb
19th December 2012 - 13:36
Comment number 359.EverySingleGoal
19th December 2012 - 12:53
Comment number 358.Guernsey Red
19th December 2012 - 12:49
Comment number 357.Chad Secksington
19th December 2012 - 12:34
Comment number 356.james0002
19th December 2012 - 12:19
Comment number 355.agent-jack
19th December 2012 - 12:14
Comment number 354.Weallfollowunited
19th December 2012 - 12:11
Comment number 353.MT1973
19th December 2012 - 12:05
Comment number 352.zboy1989
19th December 2012 - 12:03
Comment number 351.Chad Secksington
19th December 2012 - 12:00