Man City top Premier League list for spending on agent fees
Manchester City spent more than any other Premier League side on agents' fees over the past year, with £10.54m going to player's representatives.
It is the second 12-month period in a row that City have topped the list, having spent £9.66m between 1 October 2010 and 30 September 2011.
Liverpool committed £8.6m to fees, while Queens Park Rangers spent £6.82m.
The £77m total spend by clubs between 1 October 2011 and 30 September 2012 is up £5.13m on the previous 12 months.
City, who won the Premier League title in 2011-12, have invested heavily to bring in a series of high-profile players since Sheikh Mansour took over the club in September 2008.
During the recent accounting period, City signed Jack Rodwell for £12m from Everton and also completed moves for Javi Garcia (£16m from Benfica), Scott Sinclair (£8m from Swansea), Matija Nastasic (£12m from Fiorentina) and Maicon (undisclosed fee from Inter Milan).
QPR's total represents a significant rise from their spend of £2.5m in the previous period.
The west London side made a number of significant signings, including Stephane M'bia from Marseille, Samba Diakite from Nancy and the free signings of Jose Bosingwa, Robert Green and Julio Cesar.
The lowest spenders on agents' fees was newly promoted Southampton, who, with a total of £646,106, were the only one of the 20 top-flight clubs to spend less than £1m.
Total money spent on agents (Oct 2011-Sep 2012) |
|
|---|---|
|
Source: Premier League |
|
|
Manchester City |
£10,537,982 |
|
Liverpool |
£8,600,444 |
|
Queens Park Rangers |
£6,818,688 |
|
Tottenham Hotspur |
£6,595,905 |
|
Chelsea |
£6,490,382 |
|
Arsenal |
£5,580,873 |
|
West Ham United |
£4,436,992 |
|
Manchester United |
£3,681,580 |
|
Newcastle United |
£3,485,503 |
|
Everton |
£3,092,891 |
|
Aston Villa |
£2,730,539 |
|
Fulham |
£2,581,208 |
|
Sunderland |
£2,173,762 |
|
Reading |
£2,167,833 |
|
Wigan Athletic |
£1,974,305 |
|
Stoke City |
£1,717,266 |
|
West Bromwich Albion |
£1,341,301 |
|
Norwich City |
£1,248,725 |
|
Swansea City |
£1,100,845 |
|
Southampton |
£646,106 |
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Football
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Be kind, rewind
The cassette is making a comeback, but can business capitalise on a trend without falling victim to a fad?
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~25~RS~)

Comment number 140.
JP1st December 2012 - 23:56
"Man City top Premier League list for spending on agent fees"
Liverpool spend silly amounts on Joe Allen LOLZ
Link to this (Comment number 140)
Comment number 139.
pomglen1st December 2012 - 23:35
@hardybarlow:
like you did Everton today, eh? hahahha.
Link to this (Comment number 139)
Comment number 138.
hardybarlow1st December 2012 - 22:14
@ Pomglen....your bitterness is ace.
We are gonna smash you all over Eastlands next week and you know it.
Link to this (Comment number 138)
Comment number 137.
pomglen1st December 2012 - 21:50
@102. hardybarlow:
And your club will never be as big or well respected around the globe as United, no matter how many league titles your owners buy for you. Because everyone knows that all of it is purely down to money. Without that outside influence, city would be nowhere. All United's success has come from within the club and has been self-financing. Enjoy watching Utd in the CL group stages!
Link to this (Comment number 137)
Comment number 136.
pomglen1st December 2012 - 21:40
115. willipp:
You sign Scott Sinclair, we sign Robin Van Persie.
Didn't Van Persie turn you down as well? Obviously wanted to play for a real club, not a fake plastic one artificially boosted by outside money.
As for talking about history, last season is history now too. And at the moment United are above you in the table (despite not being able to defend for toffee).
Link to this (Comment number 136)
Comments 5 of 140