SPL clubs to discuss proposal for new 16-team top tier
Scotland's major clubs are pursuing plans for a new 16-team top tier but will not be swallowed up by the Scottish Football League.
All 12 SPL clubs will meet to discuss the issue with a new league of 16 top of the agenda.
Stewart Regan SFA chief executive“We remain committed to reconstruction and the leagues remain committed”
The SFL proposes a set-up that would involve SPL clubs giving up their power and merging with the lower leagues.
But SPL sources have told BBC Scotland that there is no chance of their clubs agreeing to the plans.
The SPL's recent discussions on reconstruction ended in stalemate and were put on hold following the Rangers crisis.
Clubs believe a league of 16 is the popular choice of the fans but have always been held back by a broadcasting contract that insisted on four Old Firm matches a season.
However, with Rangers now in Division Three, that is no longer an issue.
Another option being discussed is an SPL 2 format, with two leagues of 12 teams.
Clubs will meet on 3 December and there could be a show of hands.
Should there be broad agreement, there may even be change as early as next season.
Scottish Football Association chief executive Stewart Regan has revealed that SFL counterpart David Longmuir's proposal for leagues of 16, 10 and 18 had already been discussed with the professional game board, the body made up by the three governing bodies.
Regan talks to the media as Scotland head for their friendly in Luxembourg
SFL clubs meet to discuss the plan on Wednesday and will report on the response to the professional game board later this month, when the SPL is also expected to give its response.
"If it's a proposal that the clubs are interested in taking forward then we would certainly be part of the group that moves it to the next stage," said Regan.
"We remain committed to reconstruction. The leagues remain committed to reconstruction, but that will only happen if the clubs are comfortable with the direction of travel and the proposal on the table.
"Reconstruction has been on the agenda for two years. Just after I came to the Scottish FA, it was part of the Henry McLeish report.
"A number of proposals have been tabled by the SPL. We've had debates going on for months and months.
"I think there's always going to be differences of opinion on any matter involving reconstruction. That has been the case for two years.
"The various iterations that have been put forward have been debated at length and will continue to be debated at length.
"Once we have consensus on a way forward then the professional game board will be the body that takes it to the next step."
Longmuir's plan would involve the existing SPL and SFL clubs, plus second teams for Celtic and Rangers.
He said: "We've been working with our clubs on ideas and how we might wish to take the game forward and how to improve it.
"We're going to be discussing a proposal that might re-energise and refresh the game and be compelling for fans and create a better structure for the game going forward."
"And to re-engage fans and to give them a compelling league structure which creates a bit of excitement, variety and also engages with investors, broadcasters and sponsors."
Follow Chris McLaughlin on Twitter.
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Football
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
A leaf from nature's book
Cities rely on systems which pollute our world, but that will all change in the future, writes Rachel Armstrong
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~13~RS~)

Comment number 174.
Strange_UBoat15th November 2012 - 22:02
#173
Now there I would agree with you - for me its no more than 14 because it preserves some financial clout at the top and still concentrates what talent or quality there is in fixtures. It is possibly the only realistic compromise option available in terms of structure: with 2 up/2 down that should also offer a deal for the division underneath.
Link to this (Comment number 174)
Comment number 173.
DonaldA15th November 2012 - 21:49
@172 We can let others decided whether that's such a big difference. If a split is acceptable 14 preserves the number of fixtures while reducing meetings between top 6 to bottom 8 down to 2. This has actually been my preference for some time, but the split is supposedly not favoured by Sky. Then again, Doncaster also said Sky would walk away without Rangers and we'd have "financial meltdown"!
Link to this (Comment number 173)
Comment number 172.
Strange_UBoat15th November 2012 - 16:26
#170
In any one season, Celtic would only play a maximum of 5 other teams 4 league games per season (top 6) and another 6 (bottom 6) a maximum of 3 league games. Maths dear boy, don't forget your maths:)
Link to this (Comment number 172)
Comment number 171.
Jim15th November 2012 - 13:40
Scottish football is a disaster due to greed, misplaced pride and woeful youth setup. Greed-Too many teams trying to grab funds from a small pot of money. Misplaced pride - Teams which have zero chance of making an impact being funded by Chairmen trying to be Mr Big. Youth football? Sorry Messi, sorry Iniesta you're too wee, we need big skilled hackers.
Link to this (Comment number 171)
Comment number 170.
DonaldA15th November 2012 - 11:56
@167 You're the one who insisted on full-time football. It doesn't matter if you play Morton or St Johnstone. It's playing them a MINIMUM of four times a season ithat creates a far worse environment to develop young players. If it wasn't for that, I would probably keep a top 10 or 12, but it's incestuously dull, negative and corrosive.
Link to this (Comment number 170)
Comments 5 of 174