Roberto Mancini defends tactics after Micah Richards comments
Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini has defended his tactical switches after Micah Richards raised concerns about playing with three centre-backs.
Richards claimed Mancini's decision to switch from 4-4-2 during the Champions League defeat at Ajax killed City's chances of claiming victory.
But Mancini said: "If you are a top player it is not important what system you use.
"If you don't understand a system like that, you cannot play for a top team."
City were leading 1-0 through Samir Nasri in Amsterdam before goals from Siem de Jong and Niklas Moisander swung the game in favour of the Dutch champions.
Mancini then instructed his players to switch formation in a bid to rescue the Group D game.
But home midfielder Christian Eriksen scored to seal a 3-1 victory to leave bottom-placed City facing an uphill task to reach the last 16 after taking one point from three games.
Afterwards, Richards admitted the Premier League champions were uncomfortable with the three centre-back formation, saying they preferred to play 4-4-2.
Mancini added: "What Micah said is not important. He answered a question. I understand people want to write about it, but to me it doesn't matter.
"Maybe Micah doesn't know because it was his first game for two-and-a-half months."
CommentsJump to comments pagination
Comment number 264.New Victorians
27th October 2012 - 17:07
Comment number 263.Jammy-
27th October 2012 - 12:47
Comment number 262.bajandrifter
27th October 2012 - 12:26
Comment number 261.jamegumb
27th October 2012 - 11:55
Comment number 260.WordsofWisdom
27th October 2012 - 11:02
Comment number 259.Kurt Replei
27th October 2012 - 10:39
Comment number 258.rockandhardplace
27th October 2012 - 10:35
Comment number 257.Dr Boogie
27th October 2012 - 10:18
Comment number 256.Jon Morris
27th October 2012 - 9:56
Comment number 255.magicroundaboutcentral
27th October 2012 - 9:56
Comment number 254.Citybluejohn
27th October 2012 - 9:55
Comment number 253.Dr Boogie
27th October 2012 - 9:19
Comment number 252.fozzie1999
27th October 2012 - 9:05
Comment number 251.alfandmojo
27th October 2012 - 8:24
Comment number 250.stevdk
27th October 2012 - 7:29
Comment number 249.Digger Jnr
27th October 2012 - 7:10
Comment number 248.bajandrifter
27th October 2012 - 1:35
Comment number 247.Stephen Marsh
27th October 2012 - 0:45
Comment number 246.malkara1
27th October 2012 - 0:32
Comment number 245.Korean 123
26th October 2012 - 23:11