Newcastle stadium reverts to St James' Park in sponsorship deal
Newcastle's stadium name will revert to St James' Park after the Premier League club agreed a four-year sponsorship deal with a loan company.
Wonga will become the club's main shirt sponsor from next season, replacing Virgin Money, and will also invest £1.5m in the club's academy.
The firm also purchased the stadium naming rights and decided on a return to the traditional name.
The stadium had been called the Sports Direct Arena since November 2011.
St James' Park
The stadium is the oldest football ground in north-east England and has been the home of Newcastle United since 1892. It underwent a £25m transformation in the 1990s before its capacity was increased to more than 52,000 in 2000.
"We listened over the last three days and we saw what really matters to the fans," a Wonga spokesman said.
"Football is an emotional sport and it is obviously really important to them.
"We listened to what they wanted and that is why we did it."
Prior to the announcement, Football Association general secretary Alex Horne expressed some concern that the deal was with a loan company.
He told BBC Radio 5 live's Breakfast : "We are talking to the leagues about it, but on the one hand it's a legislative issue. If these companies are charging the wrong rates of interest then legislation should help us out. The leagues have clear rules about certain inappropriate advertising for children.
"We are talking to the leagues on Friday about it. If you consider it as in the category of things that are inappropriate for children like gambling and alcohol, it feels like it is in that category to me."
Ian Lavery, MP for Wansbeck, is a season ticket holder at Newcastle but has said he will now not set foot in the stadium.
"A city like Newcastle and the region should not have any ties with an organisation like Wonga," he said.
"This business makes profits off the back of deprived people who are desperate and who are the most vulnerable in society."
Mark Jensen, editor of Newcastle fanzine The Mag, said he believes the renaming could have been done to deflect criticism from the club.
"It's a clever move and clearly has been done in part to deflect some of the criticism of the business they have agreed the sponsorship with," he said.
"The fans will be over the moon that the name will be back to what it's always been, but there will be mixed emotions on the subject as it's a sad indictment of today's society that a company like that is doing so well."
Wonga sponsors two other British football clubs. It has deals with Scottish Premier League side Hearts and Championship team Blackpool.
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Football
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Watch video On the move in Mumbai
What is it like to live in this humming metropolis where everyone is in a hurry?
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~21~RS~)

Comment number 268.
wizardbenarfa11th October 2012 - 23:06
I really don't understand why everyone is so riled up about this sponsorship deal.They're obliged to post APR by law, but no one borrows from wonga to pay it back over a year, which is what apr represents. They provide short term loans, which is a month or less. The total cost of taking out a 400 pound loan is 525 pounds if you pay back over a month (see their website for confirmation).
Link to this (Comment number 268)
Comment number 267.
radar106611th October 2012 - 18:06
Bit of a relief actually. Bearing in mind the calibre of Ashley and Llambias I was expecting Tampax, Durex, or worse, The Sunderland Echo, to be the sponsors. At least the morals of Wonga match the those of the NUFC management, so it looks like a good partnership. Thanks for giving back the historic St James name that you took off the city/fans as leverage. Be playing in red & white stripes next.
Link to this (Comment number 267)
Comment number 266.
Nicola177611th October 2012 - 14:25
Very disappointed with this sponsorship deal. Reflects very badly on Newcastle United. As fans we cannot detached ourselves from the nature of our sponsors business. We are advertising them everytime we put on our team shirt. Everyone will have to make their own judgement but I am not prepared to advertise a loan shark so will not be buying a new shirt for at least the next four years.
Link to this (Comment number 266)
Comment number 265.
hp11th October 2012 - 13:01
You can debate until the cows come home whether the morals of the sponsoring company or the board are good or bad. My concern is that it's just an incredibly bad name to have on our shirts !!! Leave 'wonga' to the Southerners ! ;o)
Link to this (Comment number 265)
Comment number 264.
dc196511th October 2012 - 10:43
Ok. So local MPs and Councillors are threatening to boycott games over this. They seem perfectly happy for the players to wear kit manufactured by companies exploiting the poor in Asia! But that's the foreign poor not the good old British poor so that's OK then!
Hypocrites!
Link to this (Comment number 264)
Comments 5 of 268