MOTD analysis of Italy v Spain
Euro 2012 day three analysis: Do Spain strike the right balance?
When David Villa was ruled out of the European Championship with a broken leg, coach Vicente del Bosque was faced with the decision of how to replace Spain's all-time leading goalscorer.
Euro 2012 goal: Fabregas scores Spain equaliser
He opted not to go for a like-for-like replacement in Sunday's 1-1 draw against Italy, with Cesc Fabregas, Andres Iniesta and David Silva the Spanish players operating furthest up the pitch.
Indeed, Iniesta's five shots was more than any player on either side, with Fabregas and Silva's three attempts next on the list of shotmakers, level with Italy's Antonio Cassano.
When Fernando Torres came off the bench to replace Fabregas he wasted two good chances. So are Spain better off with or without a specialist striker in their forward line?
BBC pundits and fomer England internationals Lee Dixon and Danny Mills give their verdicts on Spain's no-striker tactic:
Lee Dixon on Match of the Day:
"Spain played with six midfielders and no forwards. They tried to draw the Italian defence out and hit the space behind.
"It was very effective at times, but the game changed when Torres came on. With him up front, the Spain build-up play was different.
"With Spain's quality in their squad, with the likes of Torres and Fernando Llorente on the bench, they will still be a force to be reckoned with."
Danny Mills on Radio 5 live:
"Spain mirrorred Barcelona's style, with a flat back four then a 1-2-1-2 formation, with two forward players of Silva and Iniesta - and Fabregas having a free role.
"In the first half, the Italians played well. They were dogged but also created chances. Spain did not get enough men high up the pitch and they were fortunate not to be behind.
"The Italy goal woke Spain up, and they pushed on and began to play with a higher tempo."
Spain's display in numbers:
- Spain had 17 shots, but only five were on target - 29%
- Italy had only 11 shots, but six were on target - 55%
- Spain made almost double the number of passes, 780 to Italy's 426
- Spain had all of the game's top eight passers, with Xavi and Sergio Busquets leading the way on 106
- Fabregas's goal was the first Italy have conceded in the second half of a competitive game since the 2010 World Cup
- It also ended Spain's 364-minute wait for a goal against Italy in a European Championships finals
- The 1-1 result is Spain's first draw in a competitive game under Del Bosque
- Seven of Spain's starting XI began the 2010 World Cup final, while Fabregas, Torres and Jesus Navas all came off the bench in the 1-0 win over Netherlands
What they said about Spain's forward line:
"I had some chances, Andres Iniesta had some chances, but we didn't score." - Spain striker Fernando Torres.
"We wanted to have superiority in the midfield so that we could have possession and arrive higher up the pitch. David Silva, Cesc and Andres Iniesta arrived very well from the second line of attack and I think they did very well in a lot of moments." - Spain boss Vincente del Bosque.
"Fernando, Fernando, do you not realise you could be playing for the very existence of centre forwards?" - Gary Lineker on Twitter.
"Torres looks a threat. Spain much better with him on team." - Robbie Savage on Twitter.
"We were a little surprised with Spain's line-up but we agreed that we needed to focus on our own game." - Italy boss Cesare Prandelli .
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Euro 2012
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Watch video Super-charged sport
BBC Travel has a go at an unusual activity which once held the world record for fastest ball speed
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~43~RS~)

Comment number 62.
Koyomi12th June 2012 - 2:16
Spain tried a system reliant on verging on walking it into the net when they had Llorente on the bench. Their passing was ok on the night but with the lack of prescence up front the Italian defenders could just swat away most of Spains attacks, a singular lapse costing them 3 points.
Link to this (Comment number 62)
Comment number 61.
Bungly Pete11th June 2012 - 22:24
I don't think it was a particularly bad idea.
The main problem Spain had was they just played poorly rather than not having a striker. Busquets and Alonso I thought were particularly poor for the ability they have. The back four were pretty poor too.
Don't think its a 'lack of Plan B' or being 'found out', just like with Barcelona they played poorly and didn't get the result because of this.
Link to this (Comment number 61)
Comment number 60.
Tony_Blooms_Full_House11th June 2012 - 21:20
Not see the logic in playing without a striker myself, but if I did, then I'd want someone like Fabregas playing as he is a top finisher.
Link to this (Comment number 60)
Comment number 59.
norsefox11th June 2012 - 21:12
Even if Spain had Klose, Gomez and Jan Koller up front and crossed they ball all game they'd have struggled to score- that's what happens when a team plays backs-to-the-wall football.
Having just watched Chelsea defend their way to European glory you'd think the British would appreciate how effective disciplined defending can be.
Link to this (Comment number 59)
Comment number 58.
Mad Cow11th June 2012 - 21:07
(28) Torres came on and played very well? Yes, if you're definition of very well is running onto someone's good through ball, bottling it when faced by the goalkeeper and totally fluffing their lines.
Link to this (Comment number 58)
Comments 5 of 62