Lance Armstrong lawyer 'would accept' lie detector results
Lance Armstrong's lawyer says he would accept the outcome if lie detector tests were taken by witnesses who have accused the 41-year-old of doping.
A US Anti-Doping Agency report described Armstrong as a "serial cheat" and a "bully", citing 26 witnesses.
"I wouldn't challenge a lie detector test, with good equipment, properly administered," said Tim Herman.
Asked whether Armstrong would also be prepared to take a test, he said: "We might do that, you never know."
He added: "I don't know if we would or we wouldn't. We might."
Armstrong was stripped of the seven Tour de France titles he won between 1999 and 2005 after Usada concluded he had led "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen".
Herman maintains the information provided by some of the witnesses cannot be relied upon, identifying several as "liars" - and he said he was "a proponent, personally" of lie-detector tests being used in the case.
"Many witnesses have contradictory stories to tell," he said.
"Lance had over 600 fellow riders, team members [and] trainers in his career racing in Europe.
"Of those, 11 came forward. Many others would and have refuted many of the allegations. Other than Tyler Hamilton, Frankie Andreu, Floyd Landis and Jonathan Vaughters I'm not calling anyone a liar - but I am calling those four liars."
Asked why Armstrong had not challenged the claims set out by Usada, Herman told the BBC's Sportsweek on Radio 5 live: "He's moved on. His name is never going to be clear with anyone beyond what it is today.
"People are fans. Most of the people that I've talked to, this is their opinion - it is 'we don't care whether he did or he didn't'."
BBC Radio 5 live Sport will look at the Lance Armstrong saga in a special programme on Monday at 19:00 BST. "Peddlers: Cycling's Dirty Truth" includes interviews with Armstrong's former team-mate Tyler Hamilton, former Wada head Dick Pound, and British cyclist David Millar who was banned for two years after admitting taking performance-enhancing drugs.
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Cycling
-
Cycling
Giro stage cancelled because of snow
-
Cycling
'Idiot' Di Luca fails doping test
-
Listen to audio Giro d'Italia podcast from 5 live
Giro d'Italia podcast from 5 live
-
Listen to audio Cavendish sprints to Giro opener
Cavendish sprints to Giro opener
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Art over politics
Michelangelo managed to complete Florence’s Medici Chapel during a time of uprising
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~10~RS~)

Comment number 219.
lamplighter16th October 2012 - 23:15
The headline you used was "Armstrong team keen on lie tests". Nothing could be further from the truth. This was suggested by the interviewer and Armstrong's lawyer indicated a maybe, but said he had no idea if Armstrong would be interested. It is a desperate attempt to fog the issue of the cast iron evidence that Armstrong cheated continuously. George Hincapie's evidence is incontrovertible.
Link to this (Comment number 219)
Comment number 218.
silverpigeon16th October 2012 - 21:54
MU51CFX - If you knew anything about this you would know that some of his accusers have already passed lie detector tests. Tyler Hamilton for example passed a LD test in an attempt prove he DIDN'T dope.
I wish some of the Lance fanboys on here would actually bother to learn something about the sport.
Link to this (Comment number 218)
Comment number 217.
Tony16th October 2012 - 21:09
I am amazed at all the people who are in denial about this inspite of an absolute mountain of evidence. If Armstrong showed some contrition maybe we could still appreciate some of the things he achieved away from cycling. US are starting to look like terrible hypocrites when you consider how quick they are to point the finger at China and other countries regarding drug use
Link to this (Comment number 217)
Comment number 216.
MU51CFX16th October 2012 - 20:20
I await the outcome of this , as I don't believe any of the accusers would take a lie detector test and pass.
Link to this (Comment number 216)
Comment number 215.
John Airey16th October 2012 - 20:10
What makes the allegations against Lance so difficult to accept is that it makes it seem easy to defeat the testers. I don't think it was and nor do I believe that drugs leave the human body to an exact timetable. As far as I understand traces of a drug should still be getting picked up by the tests. The evidence has to be tested for its credibility.
Link to this (Comment number 215)
Comments 5 of 219