Dave Brailsford says Lance Armstrong doping evidence is 'jaw dropping'
Lance Armstrong saga makes it hard to trust cycling - Brailsford
Lance Armstrong has made it hard for anyone to trust cycling, says British Cycling boss Dave Brailsford.
The American, 41, is accused of "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen".
The United States Anti-Doping Agency has banned him for life and stripped him of his seven Tour de France titles.
Armstrong report key claims:
- Achievements of USPS/Discovery Channel pro cycling team accomplished through the most sophisticated, professional and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen
- Armstrong's career at the team was fuelled from start to finish by doping
- More than a dozen former team-mates, friends and former team employees confirm a fraudulent course of conduct
- Armstrong acted with the help of a small army of enablers, including doping doctors, drug smugglers and others within and outside the sport and his team
- He had ultimate control over not only his own personal drug use but over the doping culture of the team
- Team staff were good at predicting when testers would turn up and seemed to have inside information
- Evidence is beyond strong and as strong as any case brought by Usada in its existence
"It is understandable now for people to look at any results in cycling and question that," said Brailsford.
"It completely and utterly lost its way and I think it lost its moral compass."
Brailsford said he was staggered by the extent of the systemic doping revealed by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (Usada).
"It is shocking, it's jaw dropping and it is very unpleasant," he told BBC Radio 5 live . "It's not very palatable and anybody who says it is would be lying wouldn't they?"
He also criticised Armstrong.
"I think there are plenty of people out there who saw this guy and what he did as an amazing achievement," said Brailsford.
"He is one of the first cyclists that maybe transcended the sport and became a hero beyond cycling.
"It was an amazing thing and people got behind that. So to now find out what was behind [it] is, of course, disappointing."
Brailsford insisted cycling is trying to right the wrongs of the past and said his own outfit, Team Sky, was leading the fightback.
This year's Tour de France was won by a Team Sky rider, Britain's Bradley Wiggins.
"Everybody has recalibrated and several teams like ourselves are hell-bent on doing it the right way and doing it clean," said Brailsford.
But one of the 11 of Armstrong's former team-mates who testified against him was Michael Barry, who admitted to doping while a member of Armstrong's US Postal Service Pro Cycling (USPS) team between 2002 and 2006, and who rode under Brailsford for Team Sky from 2010.
In a statement issued on Wednesday, the Canadian insisted he had not doped again from the summer of 2006.
"We signed Michael from HTC which was, at the time, highly regarded as being a very sound, clean team," said Brailsford.
"During his time at Team Sky, we have had absolutely no cause for concern whatsoever, there has never been any question in terms of his performances, his training, his behaviour on the team. There have never been any issues in that respect. But ultimately he lied.
Martin Bruin, a former chief doping inspector at the Tour de France“We are only human beings, we did our best to test and bring samples to labs according to rules, but I'm speechless about the systematic use.”
"We set out with a zero tolerance policy, so we said that anyone who has had a doping conviction from the past or proved to have been involved in doping hasn't got a place on Team Sky. That is our policy.
"When you take someone you ask them a question and if someone lies to you and you find out later it's disappointing."
In his statement, Barry said: "I apologise to those I deceived. I will accept my suspension and any other consequences. I will work hard to regain people's trust."
According to Usada chief executive Travis T Tygart, there is "conclusive and undeniable proof" of a team-run doping conspiracy at USPS.
Armstrong has always denied doping but chose not to fight the doping charges filed against him.
Usada claimed the Texan supplied banned drugs to other riders on his team, pressured them into participating in the doping programme and threatened to get them removed from the team if they refused.
Hamilton saw Armstrong take drugs
"You can see how the sport got lost in itself and got more and more extreme because it seemed to be systematic and everybody seemed to be doing it at the time," Brailsford added.
Martin Bruin, a former chief doping inspector at the Tour de France during the time Armstrong was competing, said he had been left "speechless" by Usada's report.
"I've just heard the whole story and the proof is there," he told Radio 5 live. "We are only human beings, we did our best to test and bring samples to labs according to rules, but I'm speechless about the systematic use, very disappointed.
"It's terrible for sport in general, for riders, I'm really disappointed. You are always running behind the facts.
"You're always trying your very best to clean up the business, to achieve and do what is possible. But what can you do?"
BBC Radio 5 live Sport will look at the Lance Armstrong saga in a special programme on Monday at 19:00 BST. "Peddlers: Cycling's Dirty Truth" includes interviews with Armstrong's former team-mate Tyler Hamilton, former Wada head Dick Pound, and British cyclist David Millar who was banned for two years after admitting taking performance enhancing drugs.
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Cycling
-
Cycling
Nibali all-but assured of Giro win
-
Cycling
Giro d'Italia: Stage 20
-
Listen to audio Giro d'Italia podcast from 5 live
Giro d'Italia podcast from 5 live
-
Listen to audio Cavendish sprints to Giro opener
Cavendish sprints to Giro opener
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Working Lives Ecuador
The BBC's Michelle Fleury meets five very different people who live and work in Quito
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~10~RS~)

Comment number 478.
dando13th October 2012 - 6:28
hope the below post makes sense , i had to cut and chop a lot to hopefully satisfy house rules. I was just trying to point out how these massive indemnity deals on his success should be considered as maybe a driving factor in some of his actions. Who knows but him? but it looks kinda fishy however you look at it.
Link to this (Comment number 478)
Comment number 477.
dando13th October 2012 - 6:09
ok i will try again and hope i do not break the house rules this time! From la being accused of bribing 1993 in order to win a million dollars in the final of a three race deal. Check the supporting evidence in the usda's report it is all there. To receiving huge bonuses for his success through indemnity. i used to think it was being the best he wanted, now it looks like just a greed thing.
Link to this (Comment number 477)
Comment number 476.
dando12th October 2012 - 21:56
His old friend and employee seems to sum it up while he was in a disagreement with LA " that armstrong had been cheating for profit, with the use of banned substances" + that Armstrong engaged in an "evil, oppressive and dishonest scheme that equals the greatest scandal in sports history"; seems to say it all to me, this was a trusted and old friends conclusion of what la was many years ago.
Link to this (Comment number 476)
Comment number 475.
dando12th October 2012 - 21:45
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 475)
Comment number 474.
Elscotto12th October 2012 - 19:07
Sportsmen have a special place in society - a privileged one in fact. As in the case of others who have positions of trust, & who break the law/cheat, the penalties ought to be severe. Any sportsman who has failed to maintain such standards must face potential prosecution if their acts were criminal. I would expect the bringing of charges in any case where appropriate - e.g. doping not diving!
Link to this (Comment number 474)
Comments 5 of 478