County Championship: Caribbean an option for opening matches
The opening matches of the County Championship could be played overseas as part of England and Wales Cricket Board plans to ease fixture congestion.
The proposal is in the early stages of being considered and is one of a number of ideas from the ECB.
Abu Dhabi, where the season-opener between the MCC and the county champions has been held since 2010, is understood to be one potential venue.
The Caribbean, where some teams train, could be another.
It could mean the start of the season being brought forward to March.
The need for counties to fit in 16 Championship matches, along with at least 12 40-over and 10 Twenty20 fixtures, resulted in the 2013 season beginning on 10 April and the heavy concentration of first-class games at the beginning and end of each season is a consequence of lucrative limited-overs cricket being played in the mid-summer months.
- Somerset, Worcestershire, Essex and Leicestershire all played seven County Championship matches - nearly half of the season - by the end of May
From next season, an increased calendar of 14 Twenty20 games will spread throughout the whole season, with a competition of a minimum of eight 50-over games replacing the 40-over tournament.
However, the chance of any further changes being made to incorporate overseas games to next year's calendar are thought to be remote.
When revising the calendar, the ECB faced the challenge of balancing the need for county cricket to act as a feeder to the England team while at the same time acknowledging that limited-overs cricket provides domestic sides with vital income from both spectators and television rights.
As genuine as those promoting the idea are to maybe take two games abroad at the start of the season, will it get support? The clubs of course will be very mindful of a backlash from supporters - in fact many of them seemed not to know a great deal about this this morning. A driving force for the changes - to give supporters an easier to follow schedule - could actually mean knowing when your team is playing but needing an awful lot of money to go abroad to watch them. Whether designed to gather public opinion or not, this option has certainly got plenty of people talking.
A proposal to cut the number of Championship matches to 14 was rejected, leaving the issue of fitting all 16 matches into a season that this year ends as late as 21 September.
Along with the county champions' now annual trip to Abu Dhabi, many counties travel abroad as part of their pre-season preparations.
This year, six teams - Derbyshire, Hampshire, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire, Warwickshire and Yorkshire - took part in a tournament in Barbados in March.
Former Essex cricketer and chief executive David East, now chief executive of the Emirates Cricket Board, based in Abu Dhabi, told the BBC that he had received no contact from the ECB about the possibility of staging County Championship matches.
East, who highlighted the Sheikh Zayed Stadium's capacity to stage three first-class games simultaneously, said the venue would be ''very happy and willing to stage matches if needed if that helps the ECB''.
An earlier start to the season would also prevent a clash between the end of the County Championship and the Champions League T20.
The winners and finalists of the English T20 competition took part in 2011 and 2012, but missed out in 2010 and are set to do so again this year.
CommentsJump to comments pagination
Comment number 123.WorcestershireYOYO
5th June 2013 - 22:55
Comment number 122.Eat my nutrients
5th June 2013 - 14:09
Comment number 121.tinygeorge
5th June 2013 - 13:47
Comment number 120.BeefOrSalmon
5th June 2013 - 12:43
Comment number 119.PSB808
5th June 2013 - 12:20
Comment number 118.Perton66
5th June 2013 - 12:15
Comment number 117.Hingston
5th June 2013 - 12:11
Comment number 116.tomb
5th June 2013 - 12:04
Comment number 115.NothernApe
5th June 2013 - 11:55
Comment number 114.Casey12a
5th June 2013 - 11:46
Comment number 113.PSB808
5th June 2013 - 11:39
Comment number 112.SirBob1952
5th June 2013 - 11:13
Comment number 111.Halsat
5th June 2013 - 10:42
Comment number 110.Jon
5th June 2013 - 10:01
Comment number 109.Stuart
5th June 2013 - 10:00
Comment number 108.pete clack
5th June 2013 - 9:28
Comment number 107.ed allen
5th June 2013 - 9:27
Comment number 106.jmp2012
5th June 2013 - 8:57
Comment number 105.Mathna
5th June 2013 - 8:52
Comment number 104.oluwajono
5th June 2013 - 8:35