India v England: Tourists win third Test in Kolkata to lead series
|
Third Test, Kolkata, day five: |
|
England 523 & 41-3 beat India 316 and 247 by seven wickets |
England wrapped up a seven-wicket victory on day five of the third Test to take a 2-1 lead and move close to a first series win in India since 1985.
James Anderson bowled last man Pragyan Ojha with the 10th ball of the day, dismissing India for 247 in Kolkata.
Chasing 41, England lost Alastair Cook, Jonathan Trott and Kevin Pietersen to slip to 8-3, but were taken home by Nick Compton and Ian Bell.
Analysis
"After Ahmedabad, a few basic things were rammed home to the England team. Deep down, they knew they had a better bowling attack than India, but that was never going to do them any good unless they had runs to play with. The tourists worked out what they had to do - bat long, sell your wicket dearly."
The final Test begins in Nagpur on Thursday at 04:00 GMT.
If England avoid defeat, not only will they end their 27-year wait for a series win in India, but also condemn their hosts to a first home loss since Australia won 2-1 in 2004.
Victory in the final match for Cook's men would also see India lose three matches in a home series for the first time since the all-conquering West Indies side triumphed 3-0 in 1983.
The win at Eden Gardens, where India were unbeaten in seven games dating back to 1999, completes a remarkable turnaround for the tourists, who were thrashed by nine wickets in the first Test in Ahmedabad.
After that defeat they faced criticism for another failure to make first-innings runs in Asia and the decision to omit left-arm spinner Monty Panesar.
But, despite India captain Mahendra Dhoni winning the toss in Mumbai and Kolkata on turning wickets that would supposedly favour the hosts, England have outplayed the home side in all departments.
In a repeat of Mumbai, England's third-Test win came as a result of restricting Dhoni's side on day one, making a huge first-innings total, then taking advantage of India's batting fragility in the second innings.
With India's problems exposed, Dhoni was seen in animated discussion with coach Duncan Fletcher and chairman of selectors Sandeep Patil on the outfield before play began on day five.
The efforts of Ravichandran Ashwin had at least ensured that the home side dragged the match into a final day.
Ashwin was unbeaten on 83 overnight and, with the help of numbers 10 and 11 Ishant Sharma and Ojha, had saved India from an innings defeat.
Chasing a second Test century, Ashwin cracked two boundaries from Steven Finn's first over of the day but could not keep hold of the strike for the second.
Analysis
"England have beaten India at their own game, despite having lost the toss in their last two matches. They have been playing on subcontinental style pitches, but have emphatically outplayed India. Seven wickets does not really flatter England but that won't matter. It's a terrific turnaround from the first Test."
And, with his fourth delivery of the morning, Anderson got one to move away from Ojha, just making enough contact to persuade the off bail to fall from its groove.
Intent on racing after the target, Cook ran past an Ashwin off-break to be stumped off the fifth ball of the run chase, with Trott trapped lbw on the front foot by left-armer Ojha.
Pietersen lasted only four balls before he edged Ashwin behind, but Bell, in need of some confidence-boosting runs, showed signs of fluency in his classy, run-a-ball 28.
It was Bell that turned Ashwin to square leg to seal England's first win at Eden Gardens since 1977, a victory that ensures Cook's men will not slip behind Australia in the world Test rankings.
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Cricket
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Story of the S-Class
Mercedes-Benz has been producing the model since 1972. BBC Autos looks back at its history
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~09~RS~)

Comment number 182.
Honest-to-God11th December 2012 - 19:09
This article has been accessible (by the BBC) for nearly 3 days. OK. A web article on 2011 census (that affects everyone) has been closed (1666 posting later) after just 8 hours. There has to be a double standard operating in the BBC; anything with a whiff of contention...limit the debate; anything relative anodyne...let them have ample opportunity. I have complained.
Link to this (Comment number 182)
Comment number 181.
nattubhai11th December 2012 - 13:44
indian players lack of team spirt and the determination to grind it out for five days. most of them cannot see beyond personal records and success. indian domestic cricket is not designed to produce match winners and even when it does the bcci and bunch of buffoons parading as selectors ensure with their personal whims and fancies any chance of moving indian cricket forward goes down the drain!!
Link to this (Comment number 181)
Comment number 180.
Immy11th December 2012 - 9:43
India have got to be realistic instead of blaming the captain or whatever else. The real problem for India is the below average bowling line up. Yes the batting has been failing, but that needs time as replacing the likes of Laxmann and Dravid is no breeze! However, the bowlers on the other hand are just the worst to watch on the internatinal stage.
Link to this (Comment number 180)
Comment number 179.
DrCajetanCoelho11th December 2012 - 9:37
Team England played better cricket than Team India. The visitors batted well, bowled well and fielded well. Winning away from home in alien conditions is a far bigger success than winning in one's own backyard. Hearty congratulations to Flower, Cook, their gallant cricketers, selectors, the Barmy Army regiment and fans. Our Indian Team will need to put up a fight at Jamatha.
Dr. Cajetan Coelho
Link to this (Comment number 179)
Comment number 178.
George Francis11th December 2012 - 6:03
Indian team or BCCI will not learn lessons from this, they are behind money and BCCI by restricting media coverage for money, is trying to kill the game, and crazy cricket fans will easily forget eveything after a win!
Link to this (Comment number 178)
Comments 5 of 182