Peter Moores: Lancashire will not make drastic changes
Head coach Peter Moores says it is important that no one overreacts to Lancashire's relegation from Division One of the County Championship.
They have gone down less than 12 months after winning the Championship title.
But Moores told BBC Radio Lancashire he does not expect to make significant changes to his playing staff.
"We'll play our last game and then we'll reflect to decide what we can move forward on to make sure we're more competitive next year," he said.
"You're always looking for opportunities to strengthen if the right person comes along, but we've made a fairly strong policy of playing Lancastrian lads when we think they're good enough to give them the opportunity.
"The lads are committed and they'll be hugely disappointed. We've got to come back next year with something because we want to bounce straight back out of that second division if we can."
Lancashire's relegation was confirmed with defeat at Middlesex.
Last year, the Red Rose had been celebrating their first outright Championship title victory since 1934.
Peter Moores Lancashire head coach“We've got a winter to sort ourselves out, to come back stronger and be competitive in all forms of the game”
But a slow start to the 2012 campaign left Lancashire struggling from the outset, and Moores believes it ultimately cost his side their Division One status.
"We lost three of our last four games and they came in a three-week period," he added. "After that, we've probably drawn every game bar one until Friday.
"So many games have been three-day games instead of four-day games. That's not making excuses, it's the same for everyone across the country, but that's what has made it frustrating.
"If you didn't get some early wins, you were under pressure. We didn't play well enough early on and, from then on, we were playing catch-up.
"There are reasons for it [relegation] but we shouldn't hide behind them too much. We've got a winter to sort ourselves out, to come back stronger and be competitive in all forms of the game."
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Cricket
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Be kind, rewind
The cassette is making a comeback, but can business capitalise on a trend without falling victim to a fad?
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~04~RS~)

Comment number 39.
martin11th September 2012 - 18:59
as I am now thinking that this post has been open for two days only 38 posts so I think it means simply no one cares about LANCS so I think I'm off bye
Link to this (Comment number 39)
Comment number 38.
martin11th September 2012 - 18:49
try last season WISDEN will help both season sorry though you were a fan obvious your knowledge is limited. Today at Liverpool was rained off so it could be a last day game again but it does not count if you miss the first day. In other words if you look at all the games you mentioned this season or last if a lot of time is lost then you may have a last day game but it is still on a POOR PITCH
Link to this (Comment number 38)
Comment number 37.
rpb11th September 2012 - 15:34
Trying to make sense of your jibberish. Are you talking about this seasons performance or last seasons for LCCC home matches. I am talking about last season not this.
Link to this (Comment number 37)
Comment number 36.
martin11th September 2012 - 14:47
@RPB Gave up after first 3 home? matches 34 wickets fell GOOD PITCH the big fact is win 1 match in a season and you go down and enjoy the lesser matches. So I think I have checked why does it then go to 4th day? COULD IT BE RAIN
Link to this (Comment number 36)
Comment number 35.
rpb11th September 2012 - 14:23
If games go to the final over or well into the last day then its unlikely many wickets fells on the first day. lancashire actually performed better away than at home last year. It was Warwickshire last year that were deducted points for a poor pitch not Lancashire. Lancashires last game last year was at Taunton - not usualy called a poor pitch. Do some research before you make slly comments.
Link to this (Comment number 35)
Comments 5 of 39