England can dominate Tests for years - Sir Viv Richards
West Indies legend Sir Viv Richards says Andrew Strauss's England have all the ingredients to dominate Test cricket for years to come.
Richards says England have the quality and strength in depth to establish themselves alongside the great West Indies and Australia sides of the recent past.
"England are well led by Andrew Strauss and this is a team that has the potential to create a legacy," Richards, who captained the West Indies from 1985-91 and scored 8,540 Test runs, told BBC Sport.
"They have done their homework and found a solid wicket-taking bowling unit which is of vital importance at this level.
"You have guys waiting in the wings who are just waiting for an opportunity and their competitive edge is as good as any.
"Whatever happened in the past you have proven through hard work and investment that you can become very successful."
Richards starred in the West Indies side that did not lose a single Test series between 1980 and 1995 and twice 'blackwashed' England 5-0.
As Caribbean fortunes began to wane, Australia became the dominant force, losing only two series out of 32 between 1999 and 2008 and twice setting a record of 16 consecutive Test wins.
England rose to the top of the rankings in August 2011 after six successive series victories before coming unstuck with a 3-0 defeat by Pakistan in the United Arab Emirates earlier this year.
Richards, a Test Match Special pundit during England's 2-0 victory over the Windies this month, believes learning how to avoid defeat in alien conditions is the final frontier for Strauss's men.
"It is up to the individuals, but in order to become legendary and great you must be able to win in all conditions," he said.
Viv Richards Test stats
- Matches: 121
- Innings: 181
- Not out: 12
- Runs: 8,540
- Highest score: 291
- Average: 50.23
- 100s: 24
- 50s: 45
"It is not just getting it done at home, it is going to places like India and Pakistan and getting a result.
"You don't necessarily have to win, drawing a series can be a good result. It's like football where away from home, a point is just as vital.
"Not losing, scrapping, this is what great teams do and England have a unit assembled to accomplish that."
England's number one status will be on the line in their next Test series, when second-ranked South Africa visit for three Tests in July and August, and Richards sees the contest as the ultimate test of their credentials.
"England are at home so they are going to be favourites, but I'm not going to predict this one," he said.
"The South Africa attack is one of the best you can face in world cricket. They have some guys with serious wheels, like Vernon Philander, Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel and the leg-spinner Imran Tahir can offer variety too.
"So you are going to have a much more difficult series. This series will determine where England should go and where they can end up."
West Indies legends - Sir Viv Richards
Comments
Jump to comments paginationAll posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
More from Cricket
Elsewhere on the BBC
-
Working Lives Ecuador
The BBC's Michelle Fleury meets five very different people who live and work in Quito
-
~RS~q~RS~v=~RS~z~RS~35~RS~)

Comment number 48.
fallenfaith13th June 2012 - 16:39
I think that's a bit harsh on Onions especially. I thought he bowled well, and we know Finn has done well in the past. That's one of the problems with rotation, they judged on one match (early in the season), and that match was ruined by rain, so they only had one innings. And the pressure's on them to perform because they know they're unlikely to get another chance until someone gets injured.
Link to this (Comment number 48)
Comment number 47.
alb1on13th June 2012 - 12:18
Andy; the debate is not between a 5th bowler or bat when you have a quality all rounder. Fallenfaith; I would agree England have played well with 4 bowlers (and been lucky with injury) in last 2/3 years but Onions and Finn were unconvincing. Finn especially lost his line and never produced the pace of a pure strike bowler.
Link to this (Comment number 47)
Comment number 46.
Andy13th June 2012 - 11:16
England have not struggled to bowl sides out in the last two years. Since the ashes however our batting has, at times, looked rather wobbly, especially against a decent spinner. How would an extra bowler improve things? The dominant sides dont need five bowlers they score big totals. I would rather have another top quality batsman......if we can find one.
Link to this (Comment number 46)
Comment number 45.
fallenfaith13th June 2012 - 10:07
"We have already seen how vulnerable they become when losing just two bowlers!"
That's not true. Onions bowled well and Finn was decent. We weren't at our best because 2 days had already been lost to the weather and that meant there was little chance of a result on a pretty benign pitch. And Stauss was too cautious when Best came to the crease.
Link to this (Comment number 45)
Comment number 44.
Robbie13th June 2012 - 3:11
Supplementary to my last comment. We regained the Ashes in 2005 with 5 bowlers. There was no release of pressure for the Aussies - Harmison came off and Hoggard came on; Jones came off and Flintoff came on; waiting in the wings was Ashley Giles - no Bishen Bedi but he maintained a tight line and kept the batsmen honest ( and took wickets ). For SA, drop Bairstow and pick a bowler, please!
Link to this (Comment number 44)
Comments 5 of 48