Economy and environment
Posted: Thursday, 06 December 2007
Why is £5m per annum derisory? When do you think the developers will actually get pay back on their investment? The investment they have made in R&D as well as construction of the wind farms means that pay back or profit is along way off, if at all. All I hear is NIMBY’ism, as a nation we need to develop other sources for our growing energy consumption; Lewis has an ideal profile for wind generated power like other areas of Scotland and it makes sense to develop a wind farm here. But of you aren’t keen how about a nuclear power station or High Level nuclear waste depository? Ask the RSPB for the scientific research to support their opposition, it is all conjecture and a lot of scare mongering thrown in for good measure. The RSPB are not known for their unbiased opinions in the EIA process, why let facts get in the way of preserving their views! Instead of moaning why not try and help your community and the rest of Scotland, for a change. How much does Lewis contribute to Scotland’s economy and compare it to how much it actually takes from various government and European agencies. A little pay back would be nice, don’t you think? Where does the Isle of Lewis get its electricity from now?
Tom from Stirling
Tom: Stirling itself is surrounded by lofty peaks, such as the Wallace Monument, Castle and various hills. They're often very windy, being high and exposed places - therefore suitable for wind turbines. And better than Lewis-based turbines, as the power doesn't have to be transmitted long distances (with a subsequent resistance loss), thus is much more efficient for local Stirling use. So, as you are so passionate about them, how about being consistent and lobbying your local council and residents to put turbines in these places? Local turbines for local power; do let us know what kind of reaction you get, locally.
Windpower for Stirling from Top of the Wallace Monument
Tom, With all respect, I completely disagree with each and every point you make. Thinly populated places like the Western Isles tend to be the dumping ground for unpopular schemes, whether it be a nuclear dump (Sandray and Fuday, 1988), the superquarry (Lingarabay, 1980s/90s) or a windfarm. Large scale windfarms are being fought by local people ACROSS the Highlands. And the windfarm on hills north of Stirling is not exactly being cheered locally either, by my information. I reject and resent the suggestion that Lewis does not contribute towards the economy, and needs to put something back. Greed and crass stupidity have put paid to industries like Harris Tweed and fishery related activity which could have made a lot of money here. Come back in a few years from now, and you may find that the local electricity supply comes from a number of small scale windturbines, a tidal generator at Shader (Barvas), maybe a barrage in the Sound of Harris and possibly a wave action generator in the Atlantic.
Arnish Lighthouse from Stornoway
I suspect that most people in Britain now recognise global warming to be a major problem and agree with Tom of Stirling that a sustainable answer must be found. However the recent fiasco at Bali has surely pointed the finger at the principal culprit, which contributes nearly 30% of worldwide CO2 emission, and adamantly refuses to even set targets for cutting greenhouse gas emission, let alone do anything to achieve them. The much-trumpeted U-turn by the American delegate got u-turned again when she got home and had to eplain herself to the President of the USA, George W Bush. American Humvees, churning out vast quantities of CO2, are the root of the problem; Britiain is one of the few countries to actually reduce its CO2 emissions. And some people want the Western Isles to be covered in windfarms, ruining the environment, destroying the tourist sector, rendering peoples houses unsaleable and impoverishing the population so that rich Americans can drive bigger and bigger Humvees? Get real Tom.
Malkie from Glasgow