bbc.co.uk
Home
Explore the BBC
3 Oct 2014
Click for a Text Only version of this page
BBC Homepage
BBC Radio
TodayBBC Radio 4
Today
Listen Again
Latest Reports
Interview of the Week
About Today
Britain at 6am
Have your Say
Contact Today

Richard Dawkins' Alternative Thought for the Day
When a terrible disaster happens - an air crash, a flood, or an earthquake - people thank God that it wasn’t worse. (But then why did he let the earthquake happen at all?)

Or, even more childish and self-indulgent: “Thank you God for the traffic jam that made me miss that plane.” (But what about all the unfortunate people who didn’t miss the plane?)

The same kind of infantile regression tempts us when we try to understand the natural world.

“Poems are made by fools like me . . . But only God can make a tree.”

A pretty song, but an infantile explanation. It’s too easy. Lazy. The moment we put a little effort into thinking about it, we realise that God the creator is no explanation at all. He constitutes a bigger question than he answers.

Once, we couldn’t do any better. Humanity was still an infant. But now we understand what makes earthquakes; we understand what made trees. Not just trees like oaks and redwoods, with their underground root system like a huge, upside-down tree.

The arteries that leave the heart branch and branch again like a tree. There are about 50 miles of blood vessels in a human body.

Nerve cells, too, branch like trees. They are so numerous in the teeming forest of your brain that, if you stretched them end to end they would reach right round the world 25 times.

In the face of such wonders, do you fall back, like a child, on God? “It’s so wonderful, so complicated, only God could have done it.”

It’s tempting, isn’t it. But it’s not a real explanation. Not the kind of explanation that actually explains anything. And it’s nowhere near as poetic as the true explanation.

Because the beauty is that humanity has grown up. We now know the true explanation. It’s gloriously simple once you get it, and more wonderful than our forefathers could ever have imagined. It makes use of yet another tree. The family tree of life. It began with something smaller than a bacterium, and it branched and branched to give all the species that have ever lived, whether extinct like the dinosaurs, or still hanging on like our own. Evolution really explains all of life, and it needs no supernatural intervention of any kind.

The adult response is to rejoice in the amazing privilege we enjoy. We have been born, and we are going to die. But before we die we have time to understand why we were ever born in the first place. Time to understand the universe into which we have been born. And with that understanding, we finally grow up and realise that there is no help for us outside our own efforts.

Humanity can leave the crybaby phase, and finally come of age.

Now there’s a thought for more than just a day!

Listen to Richard Dawkins' broadcast by clicking on the link on the right and read his response to listeners' emails.

What do you think of Thought for the Day? Click here to send an email or join the discussion on the message board.

Links Thought for the Day page in BBC Religion




Richard Dawkins, a not so devout sceptic
Listen - Atheist and scientist Richard Dawkins' secular Thought for the Day (14/08/2002)
Listen - Calls for atheists to be allowed to contribute to Thought for the Day (14/08/2002)
Listen - George Melly and Thought for the Day producer, Christine Morgan, on who should be allowed to contribute (14/08/2002)
Listen - Rabbi Lionel Blue and philosopher AC Grayling respond to the debate (15/08/2002)
Listeners' Emails
...evolution and God are not mutually incompatible. If this thought makes me infantile, pass the rattle!

Vince Owen, Staffordshire

The BBC still seems to believe that those who call themselves 'religious' can somehow think more clearly, deeply and meaningfully than those who call themselves 'non-religious'. How can the BBC defend that bigoted view?
Amanda Baker

Click here for more e-mails
Other Stories


About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy