bbc.co.uk
Home
Explore the BBC
Radio 4
PROGRAMME FINDER:
Programmes
Podcast
Schedule
Presenters
PROGRAMME GENRES:
News
Drama
Comedy
Science
Religion|Ethics
History
Factual
Messageboards
Radio 4 Tickets
Radio 4 Help

About the BBC

Contact Us

Help


Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 
BBC Radio 4 - 92 to 94 FM and 198 Long WaveListen to Digital Radio, Digital TV and OnlineListen on Digital Radio, Digital TV and Online

News and Current Affairs
LAW IN ACTION
MISSED A PROGRAMME?
Go to the Listen Again page
PROGRAMME INFO
Fridays 16:00-16:30
The programme that tackles the big legal issues as well as the everyday ones without long words, small print or expensive fees. It is aimed at anyone who is interested in the way the law works - and sometimes doesn't work.

Send your comments to lawinaction@bbc.co.uk
LISTEN AGAIN
Listen to Law in Action for 3 October 2003
PRESENTER
MARCEL BERLINS
Marcel Berlins
PROGRAMME DETAILS
Programme 6: Corporate manslaughter and Hatfield - how to make it stick.

- Charges due in the Hatfield rail crash case - the law on corporate manslaughter.
- IVF case- can embryos be used after one partner withdraws consent?
- When is trespass criminal?
- Community sentences - a good thing or not?
- Anti-smoking laws: do they work?
- All male juries in Gibraltar - are they legal?
Four people died and 35 were injured in the Hatfield train crash
Four people died in the Hatfield crash.

Criminal charges will soon be brought against those companies and individuals alleged to be responsible for the Hatfield rail crash in October 2000. Law in Action speaks to Richard Lissack QC, who has been advising the Crown Prosecution Service throughout the investigation,about the offence of corporate manslaughter, and why it is often so hard to make the charge stick.
Ms Hadley and Ms Evans
Lorraine Hadley (left) and Natallie Evans at a previous hearing

Two women asked the High Court this week to give them the right to implant stored IVF embryos which their ex-partners want destroyed. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act requires the consent of both partners before IVF treatment can go ahead, but the women argued that it was too late for the men to withdraw consent once the embryos had been created, and that the destruction of their embryos would unjustifiably violate their human right under Article 12 of the European Convention to ‘found a family’. One of the women is now infertile following treatment for cancer – but is the fact that this could be her 'last chance' for a baby likely to affect the court’s decision? Marcel speaks to medical law expert Emily Jackson about the issues in the case.

Anti-Mugabe protesters at Lords cricket ground.
Protestors have been arrested for criminal trespass at Lords

Last week we looked at the case of the royal party gatecrasher Aaron Barschak, and asked what offences he might be charged with. In the opinion of our expert, there was ‘very little opportunity’ to charge anyone with criminal trespass, although it was likely that the Queen would be able to sue for civil trespass in the county court. This week listener Anna Meryt emailed the programme to remind us that, since the 1994 Criminal Justice Act, a criminal offence of aggravated trespass did exist on the statute books; she herself had recently been charged with it. So what does it take for a trespass to qualify as criminal – and why wasn’t Mr Barschak’s behaviour caught by this offence? Marcel talks to solicitor Michael Schwartz.
Lord Woolf
               Lord Woolf

A report out from the Prison Reform Trust this week suggests that the record number of people in prison is due to harsher legislation and longer minimum sentences rather than any great crime wave. At the same time a grassroots project to inform people about the meaning and effectiveness of ’community sentences’ has taken off, with backing from the Chief Justice Lord Woolf. Marcel speaks to Lancashire lay magistrate Linda Thornber about her approach to sentencing, and gives her the opportunity to explain why community sentences are not a soft option.
Second-hand smoke is a health risk.
Smoking in public may soon be banned

Pressure to stop smoking in public places increased this week, with chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson urging a ban in his latest annual report, days after the Office of National Statistics reported that 88 per cent of people wanted restrictions on smoking in restaurants. Another independent report recently found that less than half the pubs and bars in England and Wales were complying with a voluntary code to reduce customers' exposure to smoke. The news comes at a time when anti-smoking laws in states and cities across the United States - most recently in Lexington, Kentucky, and most famously in New York - have attracted a lot of attention. So how do such laws work? How might they be challenged? And would they make sense over here? Charles Sigler reports on the American experience, and talks to MP for Harrow West Gareth Thomas who, until he was reshuffled into the Government last month, was promoting a private members’ bill to ban smoking in all places where food is sold.
When Sidney Lumet's classic film 'Twelve Angry Men' came out, all-male juries were the norm in America too.
All male juries are the norm in Gibraltar

Under Gibraltarian law only men have to do jury service. Women can volunteer, but very few do, so that, in effect, Gibraltar has a single-sex jury system. This week a challenge to this system, brought by an alleged victim of domestic violence who objected to the subsequent trial being heard by an all-male jury, ended its legal journey in the Privy Council. We won’t know the outcome for some months yet, but the case raises interesting issues of fairness and its perception. Marcel speaks to Jennifer MacDermott, the solicitor for Pilar Rojas, the woman bringing the case.
Listen Live
Audio Help
PREVIOUS PROGRAMMES
27 June 2003
Aiming for diversity in university admissions – where does the law draw the line?
- Affirmative action law in the US and UK.
- Royal gatecrashing: what’s the crime?
- Human rights not violated by Scottish ban on hunting.
- Church repairs:'capricious' ancient law costs Aston Cantlow couple dear.

20 June 2003
Judging the judges - who should choose?
Special single-issue edition on judicial appointments.

13 June 2003
Suicide and the state - when it must let you die.
- The law in relation to suicide.
- Executed George Kelly's 1950 conviction quashed.
- Lawyers who do it for free.
- The end of the Irvine era: his legacy and the changes to come.

6 June 2003
Nothing to lose? - what you need to know about no win no fee.
- Conditional fee agreements.
- Looted artefacts: closing the legal loophole.
- UK Coroners system to be reformed.
- Travellers' rights and local authority injunctions : the balancing act.

30 May 2003
Stansted hijackers' convictions quashed - does the law on duress need to change?
- Hijacking and the defence of duress.
- Will the timeshare fraudster really get to keep his loot?
- Should you be 'registering' your village green?
- House of Lords gets to grips with privacy and the common law.

Link to factsheets from earlier series of Law in Action



News & Current Affairs | Arts & Drama | Comedy & Quizzes | Science | Religion & Ethics | History | Factual

Back to top

About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy