Iannis Xenakis (1922–2001)
Aïs (1980)
– for amplified baritone, percussion and orchestra
Xenakis’s schooling in ancient Greek
classical literature was not evident in his first abstract
works, but in the 1960s all that changed. A setting in 1962 of
Sophocles in Polla ta dhina for children’s choir and orchestra was
followed by some striking theatre pieces setting classical
texts, notably a typically bold version of Aeschylus’ Oresteia (1966).
In 1974, Xenakis finally returned to his native Greece after 27
years’ exile – for most of which he had been under
death sentence in his homeland for his post-war resistance
activities. The overwhelming psychological impact of this
return had a crucial effect on all his subsequent music, much
of which was explicitly Greek in content and frequently engaged
with the great classical authors for imagery or texts.
Of all of these, none is more searing or
directly personal than Aïs. Subtitled ‘the land of the dead’,
this is a harrowing journey into Hades, the Underworld of
classical Greek myths. Hades does not correspond exactly to the
Christian notion of ‘Hell’, but it is made clear in
the literature that an attempted visit to the Underworld would
likely be a traumatising experience, not least due to the
impossibility of proper communication between the living and
the dead. The souls of the dead are frequently described as
living ‘in the shadows’, or ‘beyond
reach’. It is this tragic and irreconcileable split of
living from dead souls that is at the heart of Aïs.
To communicate this, Xenakis employs
devices which, even for his music, are extreme. The part for
solo baritone focuses almost exclusively on non-standard
techniques ranging from high falsetto screeching to low
chanting, encompassing growls, glides, groans and howls, making
Aïs a unique challenge in the vocal repertoire.
Originally written for Xenakis’s compatriot, the singer
and actor Spyros Sakkas, the part spends much of its time in
the higher ranges of the treble clef (at first sight of the
score, one would assume it is really a soprano part) and
demands a forthright, overtly theatrical style of delivery. The
baritone is joined by a concertante percussionist mainly
playing drums: this part features strong and often repetitive
rhythms derived, like the baritone’s music, from the
metrical patterns of classical Greek poetry. Meanwhile the
orchestra counterpoints the soloists’ interventions with
its own sonic clouds, glides, violent explosions and – at
certain key points – remarkably plain modal melodies. The
composer comments with unusual directness that ‘the
orchestra underlines or invokes the feelings of the texts, the
sensations of the dead–living couple which we all
are’. This is orchestral word-painting with a vengeance.
The choice of texts, in ancient Greek, is
apt and has strong autobiographical resonances. All but one are
from the epics attributed to Homer. The first, from the Odyssey,
describes the shedding of blood at the end of a battle, and the
gathering of the souls of the dead. The second, from later in
the same poem, is Odysseus’ account of his desperate
attempts in Hades ‘to embrace the soul of my dead mother …
I longed for this with all my heart.’ The hero attempts
three times, but each time ‘her soul flew’. This
has poignant resonances in Xenakis’s own life. His mother
died of measles when he was aged only 5, as his wife
Françoise recalled for the BBC Two film on Xenakis in
1991: ‘When she was dead Iannis was told, “Go
embrace your mother who is going on a long journey”
– that whole horrific bourgeois ritual.’ He later
told his biographer that for a long time afterwards, ‘I
felt my mother’s soul living in me … and even
others felt this too.’ The music here is particularly
evocative.
The third text is a fragment from Sappho,
whose sensual poetry Xenakis loved dearly. As he puts it, this
passionate extract ‘mixes a desire to live with a
nostalgia for death’. The final fragment is again from
Homer, this time from the Iliad – the death of the warrior Patroclus.
Aïs
has a sense of persistent endeavour, struggle and even of proud
heroism combined with a recurrent lamenting character.
It’s a head-on confrontation between sorrow and loss
together with the anger and frustration they engender. In
embracing these feelings, Aïs acquires a deep humanity and ultimately
pathos.
Programme note © Julian
Anderson