The BBC today publishes its report Taste, Standards And
The BBC: Public Attitudes To Morality, Values And Behaviour In UK
Broadcasting.
The report is informed by the most exhaustive piece of audience research
the BBC has ever undertaken in this area, also published in full today.
Independently conducted by Professor Sonia Livingstone, Ipsos MORI and the
Blinc Partnership, and speaking to close to 2,700 people across the
country, it provides the most comprehensive, up-to-date guidance for
programme-makers at the BBC and across the broadcasting industry.
The report focuses on the use of strong language, sexual content,
standards of behaviour and audience expectations of the BBC and other
broadcasters.
The research involved people of all age ranges from 11
upwards discussing a wide range of programmes, including comedy,
entertainment, documentary and drama.
The report was commissioned by the BBC Executive in response to a request
from the BBC Trust and is sponsored by Jana Bennett, Director, BBC Vision,
and David Jordan, Director of Editorial Policy.
It was authored by Alan
Yentob, BBC Creative Director, and Roly Keating, BBC Director of Archive
Content.
A full copy of the report and the research is available at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/running/reports/.
Key findings from the new research include:
- Issues of taste and standards in the media specifically are not a
top-of-mind concern for the majority of audiences but they are worried
about standards of behaviour in society generally. (14% of respondents felt concerned about programmes on
TV in terms of morality, values and standards of behaviour, while 50% felt
concerned about behaviour in society generally on this issue [1]).
- Where audiences are concerned about the area of taste and morality
on television as a whole, it emerged in the qualitative research that this
is often connected with broader concerns about falling standards in terms
of quality and the over-reliance on reality formats.
- Strong language on TV is an area of concern for a sizeable
proportion of respondents – 33% of respondents in the quantitative survey
mentioned it unprompted [1]. From the qualitative research, it was clear that
the audience recognise when language is used for clear purpose or effect
within a programme but dislike unnecessary or gratuitous use. When strong
language is combined with aggressive or bullying behaviour its potential
for offence is compounded.
- Context – including channel/time/slot/performer – is of paramount
importance when it comes to judging potentially offensive content.
- The majority value creativity and the BBC's right to potentially
offend. (In the quantitative survey, 70% of respondents strongly or tended
to agree with the phrase "creativity, new talent or innovative programmes
should be encouraged even if some people might take offence", while 12%
strongly or tended to disagree; 61% strongly or tended to agree that "the
BBC should not be afraid to show material that some people might find
offensive", while 23% strongly or tended to disagree [1]).
- The audience value regulation but the majority of the audience
sees it as primarily its own responsibility to avoid uncomfortable or
potentially offensive content (and the responsibility of parents or
guardians in the case of children). The majority of the audience does want
broadcasters to give it clear warnings around such content.
- Audiences have higher expectations of the BBC than other
broadcasters in terms of taste and standards and, in general, the BBC
performs well compared to other channels and broadcasters. (68% of
respondents were very or fairly satisfied with standards on television
generally, and 74% were very or fairly satisfied with BBC television. BBC
One and Two are clearly seen to have high standards – 61% and 56%
respectively – significantly ahead of other terrestrial, satellite and
cable channels with only a small minority of respondents – 15% and 6%
respectively – saying that they need to improve [1]).
- In the qualitative research, it emerged that the audience is aware
of, and becoming concerned by, the challenges around taste and standards
presented by the growth of online and time shifted-content. However,
there was little awareness of the BBC's guidance systems or understanding
that BBC iPlayer has a parent password protection scheme.
Following the research the BBC has made a series of recommendations
including:
- The BBC's Editorial Policy department should use the new research
to inform the ongoing revision of the BBC's Editorial Guidelines which is expected to be completed by the end of this year.
- Greater care should be taken over programmes transferring from one
channel to another, especially to BBC One. Careful consideration is to be
given to adaptations of tone or format if necessary.
- There should be new guidance on malicious intrusion, intimidation
and humiliation – to ensure that everyone involved in programme-making
understands that such behaviours are unacceptable.
- There should be a clearer policy on the bleeping of strong
language and clearer audience information and warnings generally.
- There should be a major campaign to raise awareness of the content
guidance and child protection mechanisms on BBC iPlayer.
- In music radio, editorial teams should be reminded that particular
care needs to be taken at certain times of the day, such as school runs,
when different generations may be listening together.
- More regular audience research should be undertaken to ensure that
the BBC stays closely in touch with audiences' expectations, opinions and
reactions.
- New training materials exploring audience attitudes to all key
genres should be developed and rolled out to in-house and independent
programme-makers.
Jana Bennett, Director of BBC Vision, said: "I welcome the opportunity the
report has given us to talk to our diverse audiences right across the
country.
"People value innovation, ambition and quality; they also expect
a strong presence from producers, guiding both the editorial and creative
judgements around challenging material.
"We will be sharing our findings
with programme-makers throughout the broadcast industry."
Alan Yentob, Creative Director, BBC, and co-author of the report, said: "At
a time when the media landscape is increasingly crowded and fragmented, we
felt it was vital to place audiences at the heart of the debate.
"We have
listened carefully to them and will ensure that their insight feeds into
the thinking around our programme making and our editorial guidelines."
Notes to Editors
[1] Ipsos MORI, 2,206 adults aged 16+
In November 2008 the BBC Trust asked the BBC Executive to consider
how the BBC should deal with questions of generally accepted standards in
its output.
The BBC's Director-General Mark Thompson tasked a senior pan-BBC
group (sponsored by Jana Bennett, Director BBC Vision, and David Jordan,
Director of Editorial Policy) to lead an in-depth piece of work exploring
the BBC's approach to questions of taste and standards within the media
landscape.
The research comprised:
- A review of existing research and literature on taste and
standards carried out by Professor Sonia Livingstone.
- In-depth Qualitative Research including a range of large-scale
audience discussion sessions, interviews with families in their own homes,
interviews with community leaders (over 250 people).
- Two Ipsos MORI surveys which were conducted across the UK (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) between 7 and
25 March 2009, one among a quota sample of 2,206 adults aged 16 years
and over, and the other among 237 young people aged 11-15 years old. All
interviews were conducted face-to-face, in home, and the data was
weighted to match the profile of the two populations.
Professor Sonia Livingstone (BSc Psychology, UCL; DPhil Social
Psychology, Oxford) is Professor of Social Psychology in the Department of
Media and Communications at the London School of Economics and Political Science. She is author or editor of 14 books and numerous academic
articles and chapters on children, young people and the internet;
television audiences – internet use and policy; public understanding of
communications regulation; and research methods in media and
communications.
DP/BBC Press Office