BBC HomeExplore the BBC

30 May 2012
Accessibility help
Text only
Press Office
Search the BBC and Web
Search BBC Press Office

BBC Homepage

Contact Us

Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 

Press Releases & Press Packs



14.03.02

BBC NEWS

Anthrax attacks could have been secret CIA-backed project that went awry…

Last year’s anthrax attacks which killed five US citizens could have been the climax of a secret, CIA-funded project which went disastrously wrong. This is the astonishing suggestion raised in an investigation by tonight’s Newsnight (10.30pm, BBC TWO, 14 March).


In an exclusive interview, Dr Barbara Rosenberg, a former biological warfare advisor to president Clinton and chair of the bio-weapons panel at the Federation of American Scientists, tells Newsnight there could have been a secret CIA field project to test the practicalities of sending anthrax through the mail - whose top scientist went badly off the rails. She suggests the project leader could have carried out the attack to convince sceptics to take the threat of biological attack more seriously.


Three weeks ago Dr Rosenberg claimed the FBI is dragging its feet over the anthrax investigation because an arrest would be embarrassing to the US authorities. The claim was denied by the FBI and dismissed by the White House. On Newsnight tonight she goes further, because, she says, she’s afraid of what might happen next.


She suggests that an expert from the US military bio-defence establishment could have built on a paper study from 1998 - setting out the likely impact of anthrax being sent through the mail.


"Some very expert field person would have been given this job and it would have been left to him to decide exactly how to carry it out. The result might have been project gone badly awry if he decided to use it for his own purposes and target the media and the senate for his own motives as not intended by the government project…" she tells Newsnight’s Science Editor Susan Watts.


"This person... knows a lot about forensic matters, knows exactly what he can be prosecuted for and what he can get away with and I think he had some personal matters that he might have wanted to settle but I think in addition that he felt that bio-defence was being under-emphasised for some time in the past."


According to the New York Times, the original 1998 paper study was carried out by William Capers Patrick III, for a federal contractor advising the government. Bill Patrick is the grandfather of the US bio-defence programme. He holds secret patents to the US process of "weaponising" anthrax - and is the expert’s expert. He says the FBI told him they have considered him a suspect, but it is understood that he is now considered to be in the clear.


In another exclusive interview, Dr Patrick admits that as central figure in the field he could have met or come across the person behind the attack: "Possibly, possibly, I could have talked to these people. But it would have been within the context of their having a need to know."


Newsnight asks Dr Patrick for his reaction to the suggestion that he might have been involved in the attack himself. He replies: "My goodness I did not... I did not... I’m an American patriot…"


He goes on to say: "I would hate to think that anyone in our country... that would do this to our own people, if we ever find whoever does this I hope it comes from overseas, because that way I would... well I don’t want... I want someone to be caught, I want the perpetrator to be caught, but I would rather think that it came from our enemies outside of our own country as opposed to our own people perpetrating this crime against our own."


BACK TO THE TOP

PRINTABLE VERSION




About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy