|
The
UK Government has confirmed that the United States wish to use the
RAF Fylingdales radar base on the North York Moors as part of their
controversial Missile Defence Shield.
Take
a look inside
RAF Fylingdales.
Peace
campaigners have objected to the UK's involvement with the proposed
system and say that the use of RAF Fylingdales could result in North
Yorkshire becoming a target for terrorist attacks.
Others
argue that the request will do little to change the operational
purpose of the base, which has acted as a radar tracking station
for over 30 years.
So
should America be given the go ahead? Could the proposals result
in an expansion of the base? Would North Yorkshire become a target
for terrorists?
If
you want to have your say then join in the discussion on our Message
Board.
Page
1 | Page 3 | Page
4
|
War
need never be a final option, or even an option at all. To
prepare for peace, we have to dismantle the structures of
war. Time the UK set an example.
Margaret Melicharova, Norfolk
|
|
I
think that Fylingdales should NOT be used for the intended
US purpose. The world needs to be made safer, not more dangerous,
and the proliferation of weapons is an enormous danger in
our lives today. Ammassing weapons does not give real security.
We need to address the causes of terrorism at the most fundamental
level, by continuous peaceful dialogue and the eradication
of poverty and injustice. A tall order? Naturally, but we
have to be realistic about what is really going on and why.
We have to start somewhere, and there are already brilliant
people involved in conflict resolution at the highest level.
Helen Roberts, Bury St Edmunds
|
|
HI,
As far as I understood the American wish to use the York base
for expected stars war. Why should the UK government give
this to the USA for war purpose. If it was for good aim there
will be no objection on that. I think beyond the security
aspects of UK citizen on this regard due to potential terrorist
attacks, we have to ask if the UK is an independant country
or 52 states of USA. No for the use of Yorkshire base for
war purpose. Peace & Love
Issaka Herman TRAORE, Dublin
|
|
NO.
We should not allow Fylingdales to be used for the US so-called
NMD project. The real US aim - as detailed on the US Space
Command web site - is military domination and use of space,
as part of its military domination of the globe. Any half-competent
military or technical will tell you that NMD is unworkable.
It is a smoke screen for the real aims of the US.
Mike Davies, Leeds
|
|
We
should follow the example of the Bavarian Government in Germany.
They objected to US plans for an extension of the US base
at Bad Aibling. This base was part of the same military spy
base network as Fylingdales. The US is now pulling out in
a huff and is looking for somewhere else to put their spy
equipment. Everybody should be clear that these bases are
not used to support any humanitarian purposes. They are used
by the US to spy on their friends and enemies and will ultimately
be used to support the National Missile Defence system. This
system will defend the US from attack while it pursues the
doctrine of 'Pre-emptive action' or in other words, "we'll
attack anybody we want whenever we want for whatever reason
we want."
Jason Whitelegg, London
|
|
The
USA has military bases in most coutries of the world, but
NO foreign military bases are allowed in their own country.
They use their power to treat the UK, other countries and
the United Nations in the same way as colonies - Fylingdales
and Menwith Hill are American outposts to give more control
of communications and space to America. We should not tolerate
such behaviour and kick them out now.
Bill Waton, Leeds
|
|
No
objection to 'son of Star Wars' if SHARED fully with all NATO/EU
countries, but not just to offer protection to USA or USA
plus favoured allies.
James Bovington, Horsforth, Leeds
|
|
All
the equipment at 'RAF' Fylingdales is purchased and installed
by US Space Command. The Operations at the base are only for
receiving the information from the radar pyramid and relaying
it to US Space Command HQ, Colorado USA. The Ballistic Missile
Early Warning Radar does not function to give early warning
of missiles incoming to the UK, but to the continental USA.
It looks at objects coming up over the horizon. We would get
no warning whatsoever if these objects were missiles aimed
at us. The likelihood of an enemy of the USA identifying Fylingdales
as a target for attack is real. The security at the base is
pathetic - several peace campaigners have breached the electricfied
security fence during the past sveral months.
Anne Lee, Fylingdales Star Peace Camp(aign)
|
|
Missile
Defence is extremely dangerous because it will lead to an
escalation of the nuclear arms race. The use of Fylingdales
will make North Yorkshire a target for terroritst attack.
Jenny Maxwell, Birmingham
|
|
It
should be pointed out that in essence, Fylingdales will be
providing an early warning system for the US. The "Son of
Star Wars" program therefore won't help us, as by the time
the information has been passed to the US, the missile will
either have landed upon us or being heading across the Atlantic.
David Waldock, UK
|
|
First
of all for you people bashing on America and feel it is trying
to take over the world. To some degree it's already happened.
I bet you touch a piece of America every single day of your
life. food, drink, cars, medicine, inventions, etc. The list
will shock anyone who researches deep enough. Hell, I bet
you even feel the echo of everything that happens to them
in your investments, as stocks fluctuate. Please try to look
at a bigger picture on this subject. What happens to the U.S.
WILL effect us on many levels. As far as the fanatic protestors
are concerned. You people need to get a life. Let me point
some things out concerning this upgrade and the surrounding
area. 1. This thing is designed more for the one crazy man
with one missile. 2. If the crazy man gets his hands on one
missile and wants to use it. why the hell would he shoot it
at Fylingdales? or England for that matter? He'll want to
go for the big kill in America 3. If we come across someone
who has a lot of missiles to use and decides to fire them
all. I'm pretty sure we all will have more things to worry
about than how this upgrade has effected local tourism. Call
me crazy
I love fish, whitby
|
|
I
would vote for Fylingdales should not be used by the USA and
that we should not be involved in a war with Iraq
Jacqueline Mulhallen, Norfolk
|
|
The
Ami's didn't invent charity - no way. I mean they are only
reading your emails at Menwith Hill to protect you ! Why don't
people just open their eyes. The Americans only do anything
for their own profit !!!
Nigel Kraus, Karlsruhe
|
|
If
your really that concerned about your precious radar station,
you do not understand either it's purpose, it's capabilities,
nor it's value. Though useful, it is not crucial. What if
the u.s. stops sharing satellite recon and detection as well
as the north am based warning system? Please, by all means,
shoot your own foot off. And if you think one little radar
station will prevent either the development or deployment
of probably the most sophisticated and sorely needed defense
technology (which the uk is currently entitled to by virtue
of our long standing relationship) ever, go crawl under a
rock and try to hide from an incoming nuke.
james, riverdale
|
Page
1 | Page 3 | Page
4
If
you want to have your say then join in the discussion on our Message
Board.
|