Obama: US cannot ignore Syria chemical weapons

President Barack Obama (6 September 2013) President Obama has acknowledged he faces an uphill battle to win congressional backing for a military strike against Syria

President Barack Obama has said the US cannot "turn a blind eye" to the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

He was speaking after returning to the US from a G20 summit in Russia, which failed to produce international agreement on military action in Syria.

The US accuses President Bashar al-Assad's forces of killing 1,429 people in a poison gas attack on 21 August.

EU foreign ministers say there should be no action before the UN reports back on chemical weapons attacks in Syria.

Mr Obama faces a tough week of trying to persuade Congress to authorise military action.

He will also seek public support in a White House address on Tuesday.

Start Quote

He's decided that even if no-one else (apart from France) is willing to step up to the plate, it is America's job to do so. Few at home or abroad seem to agree with him - but they don't have any other answer either”

End Quote

Mr Assad and his ally President Vladimir Putin of Russia blame rebels for the attack.

In a radio and internet address, Mr Obama said he understood that the American people were "weary after a decade of war" and insisted this would not be an "open-ended intervention" akin to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"But we are the United States of America. We cannot turn a blind eye to images like the ones we've seen out of Syria.

"Failing to respond to this outrageous attack would increase the risk that chemical weapons could be used again, that they would fall into the hands of terrorists who might use them against us, and it would send a horrible signal to other nations that there would be no consequences for their use of these weapons.

"All of which would pose a serious threat to our national security."

Any action, President Obama said, would be "limited both in time and scope - designed to deter the Syrian government from gassing its own people again and degrade its ability to do so".

G20 deadlock

Russia restated its opposition to any strike at the G20 summit in St Petersburg, with Mr Putin warning that military intervention would destabilise the region.

As President Obama returns to the US, his Secretary of State John Kerry is on a whirlwind tour of Europe to build international support for military action in Syria.

In a four-day trip, he's meeting with EU foreign ministers in Vilnius, Arab League representatives in Paris, his French counterpart Laurent Fabius in Paris, as well as William Hague in London. The initial purpose of this round of travel was to make advances on Middle East negotiations - a meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is still in the diary for the London leg - but the issue of Syria is likely to overshadow everything else.

With the UK parliament vote ruling them out of any action, it is key for the US to drum up as much international support as it can.

Secretary Kerry began his trip by meeting the president of Lithuania, the country which currently holds the presidency of the EU.

In a radio interview on the eve of their meeting she said the United Nations must be involved - a requirement many countries have ahead of committing to any action.

A US official conceded that there were divisions in the EU on how to act on Syria, but said Mr Kerry would take this opportunity to discuss ways to work with the UN, as well as its limitations.

Both Russia and China, which have refused to agree to a UN Security Council resolution against Syria, insist any military action without the UN would be illegal.

President Obama has only a few days to convince Congress, which returns from its summer recess on Monday.

Both the Senate and House of Representatives could vote on the Syrian issue as early as next week.

Mr Obama has acknowledged that he faces a "heavy lift" to win congressional backing.

A poll commissioned by the BBC and ABC News suggested more than a third of Congress members were undecided whether or not to back military action - and a majority of those who had made a decision said they would vote against the president.

Many remain concerned that military action could draw the US into a prolonged war and spark broader hostilities in the region.

'Prepared for action'

In Europe for a four-day visit, US Secretary of State John Kerry met his French counterpart, Laurent Fabius, in Paris and both men spoke of their determination to respond to the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

Mr Kerry said the US and France were not talking about going to war, but discussing limited military action, aimed at degrading the Syrian authorities' ability to use chemical weapons.

Repeating a phrase he used earlier in the week, he said the international community was facing a "Munich moment" - a reference to the policy of appeasement that failed to stop Nazi Germany in the 1930s.

US Secretary of State: "We are very grateful for the statement that came out of the meeting today with respect of Syria"

It was not, he said, the time to allow unfettered use of some of the most heinous weapons on Earth.

"There are a number of countries, in the double digits, who are prepared to take military action," he added. "We have more countries prepared to take military action than we actually could use in the kind of military action being contemplated."

Earlier, in the Lithuanian capital Vilnius, he welcomed a statement on Syria by EU foreign ministers who were meeting there.

The EU ministers issued a statement saying that the available intelligence "seems to indicate strong evidence that the Syrian regime is responsible for the attack".

While calling for a "clear and strong response", the ministers said that the crisis in Syria should be addressed "through the UN process" and said they hoped UN investigators could issue their preliminary report on the attack as soon as possible.

They said they welcomed French President Francois Hollande's call to wait for this report before taking any further action.

Mr Kerry welcomed the EU's "strong statement about the need for accountability". A senior US state department official who attended Mr Kerry's meeting with the ministers said Mr Kerry had made clear the US had not made any decision to wait.

The US secretary of state is due to meet Arab League representatives in Paris before travelling to London for further talks with UK Foreign Secretary William Hague.

Some 100,000 people have died in the two-and-a-half-year-old Syrian conflict, according to the UN.


More on This Story

Syria's war War in Syria


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 698.

    If you want the people's backing then we need to know what happened, even if you are telling the truth and genuinely have evidence of the government doing this (before the UN have finished their investigation?..) then unfortunately we can no longer take the word of a politician as the truth, without reliable and trust worthy sources and data. We are not stupid

  • rate this

    Comment number 697.

    656. Reggie
    The bbc removes posts because they don't side with its opinions. I thought media was supposed to be u nbiased
    So why don't they remove the above post of yours then? Surely, that's more "incriminating" than your removed post which none can remember anyway.

  • rate this

    Comment number 696.


    ´U.N. has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas: investigator


    "(Reuters) - U.N. human rights investigators have gathered testimony from casualties of Syria's civil war and medical staff indicating that rebel forces have used the nerve agent sarin, one of the lead investigators said"

  • rate this

    Comment number 695.

    "amazing for a person who was awarded a nobel peace prize he sure wages a lot of war"

    The Nobel Peace Prize means nothing, as the committeee is pickled in leftie PeeCee. What had Obama done for peace when they gave it to him? He got it because they liked his politics at the time.I'm sure they regret it now.

  • rate this

    Comment number 694.

    @670. TrueToo

    I agree "simple equation" appears flippant, which is not the intention.

    religious factions, centuries of cultural differences, civil wars & weaponry in Syria is indeed complex.

    I was referring to the strategic overview: what's to gain, which area in Syria to control, which neighbouring country will benefit, is Turkey asserting regional dominance.

    Iraq & Libya are prime examples.

  • rate this

    Comment number 693.

    "I wonder who he will be attacking if it turns out to be the opposition using these weapons?"

    As always, the US will make-up some cock-and-bull story as to why it needs to do, whatever it decides to do.

    Funny that its always in the 'US National Interests' to do it, isn't it?

    Trouble is - its not always in the interests of other countries.

    Does it care? Not one iota!

  • rate this

    Comment number 692.

    If Obama goes ahead with military action he will be responsible for the slaughter of many minorities by the so called "Freedom Fighters".......Watch RT News channel as they give an open and honest report on Syria.

  • rate this

    Comment number 691.

    Can we just rename BBC news to "BBC SYRIA WAR PROPAGANDA 24/7l

  • rate this

    Comment number 690.

    "President Barack Obama has said the US cannot "turn a blind eye" to the use of chemical weapons in Syria."

    But its OK to keep the UN and public blind from all the evidence?

  • rate this

    Comment number 689.

    From Iraq To Afghan, Sudan,somalia, Libya, Lebanon, Syria & then to Iran the wests aggression has become plain for the world to see. First it was a story of vengeance and terrorism, then it was to overthrow dictators with WMDs, Attacking groups of rebel fighters and militias... but now there are no more lies to tell that will pass for truth, my only fear is an 'incident' to allow them into Iran.

  • rate this

    Comment number 688.

    Putting straight, onto ladder of your devising

    That persuasion CAN be 'an art', means that - to some extent - it WILL involve art, even if wishing to lose a vote

    When Obama speaks, like Martin Luther King, suspicion that he DOES 'have a dream', sadly beyond those of God Bless America audience

    In the hands of a UK Obama, for a UK audience, NHS might well have been safe

  • rate this

    Comment number 687.

    @682 Morey Bund Don`t take it so personally. It happens to most of us. You need a sense of humour.
    Watch this post disappear too.

  • rate this

    Comment number 686.

    "1429 people". Hardly on the same scale as the deaths caused in Vietnam by use of Agent Orange then?

    A serious point though, who would act against a major superpower if it behaved in this way?

  • rate this

    Comment number 685.

    When they gave Barack Obama a Nobel Peace Prize that's when it became clear that the Nobel Committee had been infiltrated by idiots (allegedly) and / or (politics). It was only given to him because of well you know ... but nothing to do with Peace, With his current record it should be the Nobel Prize for Drone Bombing and War.

  • rate this

    Comment number 684.

    "Does the world need a super-cop?"

    Does a super-cop always need someone to rescue?

    The US should've had a big celebration of peace at the end of the cold war and used the moment to redefine itself as something other than the West's military complex.

    Oh well.

  • rate this

    Comment number 683.

    Have you seen the video that the French gov considers to be 'proof'' of a chemical attack?


    Well-armed rebels in sartorial elegance

    Spotless clothing

    Well-manicured hands

    And white designer trainers

    Then a 'chemical attack' that is hilariously stylish to watch

    They no doubt gave a copy to Kerry.

  • rate this

    Comment number 682.

    Damn my on topic comment has just been removed. OK I slipped in a criticism of the mods. I am outta here. Morey Bund is no more. BBC fascist thought police.

  • rate this

    Comment number 681.

    I feel so foolish that I believed Obama was different back in 2008.

  • rate this

    Comment number 680.

    Obama is right about not to ignore Syria. BUT, its not a absolute necessary to topple the regime there because of the unknown consequences of that. The international community should seek alternative solutions and redress to the crisis, other than military intervention. All sides in this conflict are brutal, vile and ignorant, and none of them have due care for the poor civilians.

  • rate this

    Comment number 679.

    Thanks to whoever posted this video earlier. It's an -eye-opener and should be mandatory viewing for all pro-war Americans...

    Congressman Paul on intervention in Syria -


Page 17 of 51


More US & Canada stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.