Obama chooses gun control fight
Barack Obama has called for a wide-ranging approach to mass violence, but it is clear he expects a proposal for a ban on assault rifles
President Obama has, whether by design or not, chosen a fight on one of the issues that will define how we look back on his presidency.
The obscene massacre in Newtown shocked the nation. Yesterday, at lunchtime, I heard a man outside one of the shrines in the centre of town saying that he hadn't felt like this since 9/11.
This is not a pivotal moment on that scale, but it could be important nonetheless.
The president said he hoped memories were not so short that the shock of the killings had faded in a month's time when he expects a report on his Oval Office desk.
“Start Quote
End QuotePreventing some of the worst consequences of America's love affair with guns would be a very big legacy indeed”
Many are cynical about this, and doubt the president's rhetoric will amount to much. But he will be hung out to dry if it doesn't.
He has gone out of his way to say that he wants action, not just words, and expects a series of concrete proposals that he will put in his State of the Union address at the end of January.
The president has called for a look into mental healthcare, video games and the culture of violence. But it is clear he expects Joe Biden to recommend a ban on assault rifles.
That means he is taking on a huge political battle that will rage throughout the year and probably for many years to come.
I am intrigued, more generally, by Obama's political game. Taking on Republicans in Congress, and then pointing out they stopped him from doing much of anything, doesn't have a lot of traction.
It worked, just, before the election. But in a second term, unless he expects to win back the house in the mid-terms, it won't earn him a place in the history books.
But preventing some of the worst consequences of America's love affair with guns would be a very big legacy indeed.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~40~RS~)



Will gun laws hurt mentally ill? 
Search for US tornado survivors
Smarter future
Food swappers
Unlocking secrets
A leaf from nature's book
Click
Comment number 443.
Chryses20th December 2012 - 23:56
MovingViolation (436),
Sorry, that should read "There may be MANY factors ..." not "There may be may factors ..."
Link to this (Comment number 443)
Comment number 442.
DigitalSpin20th December 2012 - 23:52
@440.FrenchToaster - "There's still going to be a lot of opposition to an assault rifle ban."
At least with this massacre still fresh in the minds of many, it is doable. Obama can point to the prior ban as an example. Other possible controls could be a legal limit on the size of the magazines used in existing weapons, or even a ban with a buy-back program.
Link to this (Comment number 442)
Comment number 441.
margaret howard20th December 2012 - 23:50
406 DavidUS
"Don't they teach history anymore in UK comprehensive schools?"
History - YES
Propaganda - NO
Link to this (Comment number 441)
Comment number 440.
FrenchToaster20th December 2012 - 23:45
There's still going to be a lot of opposition to an assault rifle ban.
Link to this (Comment number 440)
Comment number 439.
Chryses20th December 2012 - 23:44
MovingViolation (436),
I just don't see a Constitutional Amendment being a realistic goal, and any substantive changes should focus on smaller, more plausible goals. There already is an effective ban on ownership of automatic fire weapons and military small arms, so there is room for legislation that will pass constitutional review.
Link to this (Comment number 439)
Comments 5 of 443