Newtown overwhelmed by media
News trucks line the streets near Sandy Hook Elementary
"Go home, please, go home, all of you."
The man standing in front of me in the lobby of my hotel was not in the slightest bit aggressive, but he was very clear.
"It's unbearable. What do you all want? I know four or five of the families who lost kids and it's too much for them, with all the media here. What do you all want?"
Most of the rest of the lobby - and much of the hotel - was taken up by notebook-wielding, fleece-wearing, camera-toting journalists. But that's just the start.
The village of Sandy Hook, the centre of which is little more than a crossroads, has been transformed.
A changed townIt seems like a nice place - a classic little New England village, with white wooden houses and good-looking shops.
But it is difficult to know what it is actually like because, early on Saturday, it had been transformed into a set, a backdrop for the vast swarm of journalists that had descended on the place.
The main street, Church Hill Road, that leads towards Sandy Hook Elementary school, was grinding with bumper-to-bumper cars that it is difficult to imagine are there every - or any - day.
“Start Quote
End QuoteI have covered stories for 15 years in the field, some of the biggest, and have never seen anything like this, nor felt so uncomfortable about being part of it.”
In the small car park in front of the Methodist church, satellite trucks belted out noise and exhaust fumes; up and down the street cameramen roamed, filming the traffic, filming the shops, filming each other.
At the bottom of Church Hill Road, where the hill begins to climb up toward the firehouse and the school, there were more satellite trucks and live positions for television correspondents.
On Saturday a few shops had pinned notices to their doors, and one or two lampposts had messages of sorrow and condolence.
Today, a shrine of candles and teddy bears and messages attracts a steady flow of visitors, many filmed and interviewed by the omnipresent camera crews.
Up by the firehouse, by the sign for Sandy Hook Elementary School ("Visitors Welcome"), there are more TV live positions.
In the overflow area are dozens and dozens and dozens more satellite vans.
Media footprintNormally we journalists are the ones pressing our noses to the glass, reporting on what we see. Here it is the residents of the town who, driving very slowly in the staggering traffic jam look on, amazed at the freak show that has descended.
I have covered stories for 15 years in the field, some of the biggest, and have never seen anything like this, nor felt so uncomfortable about being part of it.
There are hundreds upon hundreds of journalists here, all of us searching for a new angle on a story that, really, came and went in a few terrible minutes on Friday morning.
How much more is there to say about such horror?
Perhaps not much.
On Saturday, in the space of 10 maybe 15 minutes, whilst I tried vainly to persuade members of a Newtown women's club to do an interview, I saw a placard-carrying woman by the roadside approached, filmed, photographed by more than a dozen different cameramen and journalists.
For good or ill, I do understand the machinery of news. The BBC alone has four 24-hour news channels (two radio, two TV, one each respectively for domestic and international audiences) along with three TV news bulletins a day, four radio news programmes most days, radio news bulletins, summaries and our online operation.
None of these outlets is catered for without correspondents and producers, cameramen and technicians.
Throw in ITN, Sky, Channel 4 and the newspapers - one broadsheet sent four correspondents - and British outlets alone must have sent 100 people to this tiny place.
And the American networks and cable new channels must each have sent dozens of staff here, for their news bulletins and their programmes; CNN has rolled from Newtown pretty much non-stop since the massacre. On the networks, programme after programme has been anchored from the town.
There's no denying that this is an astonishing event that audiences want to know about.
But our footprint in tiny Sandy Hook is exceptionally heavy. And after a while, you have to wonder what more there is to say.
The children have gone. Their poor parents are grieving. The police are saying very little.
Some reporting comes close to repeatedly ripping a sticking plaster off. Watch or listen or read too much, and it feels as if we are wallowing in other people's pain.
Go home, the man in the lobby said, go home. And very soon, I will.
UPDATE: Jonny Dymond left Newtown on the night of 17 December, shortly after posting this blog.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~15~RS~)



Will gun laws hurt mentally ill? 
Woolwich: Security services defended
'Field of diamonds'
The dogulator
Rising anger
Selective disclosure
Art over politics
Talking Movies
Comment number 176.
flora18th December 2012 - 23:50
Glad to see you have left. It's getting very ghoulish having the media take pictures at every funeral and interview young children. Enough is enough. Let's not give the perp any more notoriety.
Link to this (Comment number 176)
Comment number 175.
Florence18th December 2012 - 23:16
I have stopped watching this on the news having seen very young children from the school being interviewed about their experience. This was very disturbing indeed and I do not want to see anymore - it's about time the journos left these people in peace - no audience, no performance.
Link to this (Comment number 175)
Comment number 174.
LandOfTheMushroomPeople18th December 2012 - 23:14
"So. Now that your child has been shot.
How do you feel?
Can we stick a camera in your house too?"
Link to this (Comment number 174)
Comment number 173.
indy_comment18th December 2012 - 23:08
154 Horace.
Yeah, Warziristan is a long way from Connecticut, in more ways than one. Some people want to keep it that way.
Link to this (Comment number 173)
Comment number 172.
Cloud-Cuckoo18th December 2012 - 23:04
If any journo is looking for something to do, they could do worse than going and camping outside one of Mitt Romney's houses - that would probably work out at one house each for the BBC team to cover them all - and trying to get a comment from him about gun control.
Link to this (Comment number 172)
Comments 5 of 176