US presidential debate: Pundits' views

Shadow cast from the debate podium

President Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney clashed in the first debate of the campaign. How were their performances rated by the pundits watching backstage?

Expert Verdict

The pundits were speaking to the BBC's Adam Blenford in Denver

Glenn Thrush Politico

Glenn Thrush

Barack Obama has not been on a debate stage for 1,400 days and that really showed tonight. Mitt Romney has been in 29 debates in the last 18 months. One guy used to do this passably well (Obama). The other guy currently does it well. The president is really going to have to improve his performance in the next two weeks.

Mark Knoller

CBS News

Mark Knoller

It seemed to me that both candidates spoke with passion. It seemed that they were knowledgeable on their policies and conversant with them. But it appeared that Romney was more confident. Sharing the stage with the president made him seem presidential. And even Obama campaign aides say Romney did himself good tonight.

Molly Ball

The Atlantic

Molly Ball

A major win for Romney by any measure. He was quick, aggressive and energetic, while Obama was rambling and defensive much of the time. The president may have wanted to seem above the fray, but instead he seemed beside the point, and Romney seemed more than capable of stepping into his shoes.

Dan Balz

Washington Post

Dan Balz

The president was not bad but Romney showed up with a clear sense of what he wanted to do. The president was on defence and Romney was on offence. There was a lot of substance, some of it in the weeds. It underscores there are a lot of differences between the two candidates. Romney's campaign feels pretty good. But they will really be looking at where they are in two weeks.

Toby Harnden

Daily Mail

Toby Harnden

Romney came into the debate determined to sell his plan to rescue the American economy. It was a businessman's pitch and he did it masterfully. It was as if Obama was being steamrollered in the process - the president was listless, tetchy and uncharacteristically uncertain. This election is wide open again.

Lawrence O'Donnell

MSNBC

Lawrence O'Donnell

It's impossible to judge a winner tonight. It's not up to anyone on the debate stage or in this room. The answer is in the polling, and we will start to get that next week. If there's no movement in the polls this debate will mean nothing. It would have been entirely neutral. There was nothing said in that debate that was memorable 10 minutes later.

More on This Story

US Presidential Election 2012

More US & Canada stories

RSS

Features

  • chocolate cake and strawberriesTrick your tongue

    Would this dessert taste different on a black plate?


  • Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince George leaving New Zealand'Great ambassadors'

    How New Zealand reacted to William, Kate - and George


  • Major Power Failure ident on BBC2Going live

    Why BBC Two's launch was not all right on the night


  • Front display of radio Strange echoes

    The mysterious 'numbers stations' left over from the Cold War era


  • A letter from a Somali refugee to a Syrian child'Be a star'

    Children's uplifting letters of hope to homeless Syrians


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.