Can Mitt Romney's campaign recover?

Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign fundraiser in Salt Lake City, Utah 18 September 2012 Mitt Romney's campaign has said it will change its strategy - but what will that mean in practice?

The Romney remarks are meat and drink to all of us who are covering the US election campaign.

Whether you call them gaffes, mis-steps or outbreaks of unexpected honesty, such remarks are revealing. They are all part of the thrills and spills of the destruction derby we call an election campaign. Whether they shift the opinion polls one jot or change any voter's mind is another matter.

Whatever you think of Mr Romney's ideological spin on his own strategy, his basic point is true: the majority of voters are not going to change their minds.

There are about 10% of voters in the middle who matter. And there is no evidence that these news stories, on their own, change anyone's mind.

Religion and guns

There is an obvious comparison: the rich candidate who told rich donors that some white Americans were clinging to their religion and their guns.

Of course that candidate, Barack Obama, is now president. His remarks caused just as much of a fuss as Mr Romney's, although they were much earlier in the 2008 electoral cycle.

There is a lot of debate on the blogosphere about the similarities and differences with that incident. Those on the left tend to stress that Mr Obama's point was the opposite of Mr Romney's - he would try to get around perceptions and attempt to win people over.

Many conservatives think Mr Romney has spoken the plain truth and nobody should be offended by it, whereas, they say, Mr Obama was guilty of bigotry.

But one senior conservative, Bill Kristol, while making the same comparison and saying Mr Romney should be president, sees his remarks as "arrogant and stupid", insulting his own voters.

A new charge

This moment may not be important on its own. It probably isn't a pivot. But it stands as a symbol for a few days that could be - might be - pivotal.

For seven days now Mr Romney has been on the back foot, excusing himself and explaining his words, not pushing his message. At the very time when the opinion polls suggests that he needs to be aggressively fighting for every inch of ground, he has lost the microphone.

Politico's article about "stumbles" in the campaign suggests that the blame game had begun before that, a clear sign of an ailing campaign. If there's not a meltdown then there's something more serious than a highly strung rethink.

Although it is not clear what it will mean in practice, there is constant chatter about a new focus for the team.

There are just 49 days to go before America votes. It smacks of desperation for a candidate, standing on a gaffe-strewn battlefield, to order a new charge in a different direction.

But that doesn't mean it is bound to fail.

Mark Mardell Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell Presenter, The World This Weekend

Trident question comes to the surface

In 2016, the new government will have to decide whether to continue to invest in the Trident programme - and this could be a key issue in a hung Parliament, says the BBC's Mark Mardell.

Read full article

More on This Story

US Presidential Election 2012


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 493.


    Truly scary. Seems like Romney's 'half the population are irrelevant and inferior and should be treated us such' doctrine has some precedent.

  • rate this

    Comment number 492.

    477. Curt Carpenter

    He says he'd never vote for a "socialist like Obama," but he can't vote for Romney either now. He's planning to stay home.

    Now he understands how so many Obama supporters feel. They're staying home too. Turnout will be nothing like 2008 despite all the apps.

    Maybe your neighbor will change his mind after seeing Obama's pirate tweet. Now there's a smart move.

  • Comment number 491.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this

    Comment number 490.

    Romney represents everything the corporations don't like:

    He would put Americans first+
    he understands how to create jobs+decrease debt

    Obama represents everything corporations love:

    He renewed Bush tax cuts, he passed Obamacare and not universal health care, he did not pass any real reform on Wall St

    Media is negative toward Romney
    b/c Obama represents corporations including media

  • rate this

    Comment number 489.


    Perhaps I was unclear. Egypt for example... there is no civil law that requires women to to wear the Hajib, yet they are routinely ostracized or physically assaulted for not doing so, with near impunity for their attackers.

    This is 100% due to socio-religious shifts, which unofficially elevate Islamic fundamentalism over civil law. Iranians also vote for a president subservient to clerics.


Comments 5 of 493



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.