On Biden's 'Wall Street chains' remark

 
Vice President Joe Biden in Danville, Virginia 14 August 2012 Joe Biden's remarks were quickly seized on by the Romney campaign and the US media

So much for Paul Ryan's pick as Romney running mate elevating the debate to one of big ideas. We are back to mud slinging.

Media coverage is still on fire with reaction to that comment by Vice-President Joe Biden about Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his number two, Wisconsin Representative Ryan: "They're going to put y'all back in chains."

Mr Biden's remarks, to an audience including many African-Americans, were about Mr Romney's plans to get rid of laws regulating banks.

This is what he said: "Romney wants to, he said in the first 100 days, he's gonna let the big banks again write their own rules. 'Unchain Wall Street!' They're going to put you all back in chains."

'Race-baiting'?

The Romney campaign said it was "reckless", "outrageous" and Mr Romney himself accused the president of running a campaign of "anger and hate".

Given that the usual complaint about Mr Obama is that he is too detached - too cool - that is quite a charge.

Most of the media seem to agree Mr Biden made an awful gaffe. Most of the media have skirted around why it was supposed to be so terrible. It was, of course, because he (perhaps inadvertently) used an image of slavery.

The BBC analyses Republican running mate Paul Ryan's controversial economic policy

It is a striking feature of American political debate that it is not just using racist language that is out of bounds. For some, any mention of race or African-American history is on the index of forbidden topics.

Of course, Mr Biden's comments were provocative and perhaps over the top - but were they beyond the pale? (A phrase which does have a racial connotation, but perhaps not the one you would think).

Some have called on Mr Biden to resign.

Leading conservative commentator Michelle Malkin said he was "race-baiting" and guilty of a "racist racial pander".

Redstate says he is "inciting racial animosity for political gain". (One comment on the blog adds: "the Marxists insist on calling us 'racists' - no matter what we do, so we might as well wear it as a badge of honour!)

The blog White House Dossier says: "Biden's metaphor fits naturally into what is a clear strategy to make minorities afraid of Republicans. Whether planned or not, it emanates from the campaign playbook. It stinks."

It is, of course, offensive to accuse people of wanting to re-introduce slavery.

But there is such a thing as being too sensitive. So, what in all other countries would be a fairly normal metaphor is seen here as an outrage.

Sometimes it seems as if a curious moral equivalence has been established - merely mentioning the past treatment of African-Americans is just as bad as racism itself.

 
Mark Mardell, North America editor Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell North America editor

More on This Story

US Presidential Election 2012

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
 

Comments 5 of 170

 

Features

  • The Duchess and Duke of Cambridge and Prince GeorgeGorgeous George

    Baby steals show as tour reveals rise in support for monarchy


  • Houses of ParliamentBig impact?

    How a Scottish Yes vote would change the UK Parliament


  • Kim Jong-un visits a children's campThe Notepad Men

    Who are the people who take down Kim Jong-un's every word?


  • Donald Tusk7 days quiz

    What made Poland's prime minister become an internet hit?


  • Beebcoins logoMaking money

    How easy is to coin your own virtual currency?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.