Mitt Romney foreign trip silence irks reporters


'This is a holy site for the Polish people'

The Republican presidential candidate solemnly laid a wreath at the tomb of Poland's unknown soldier, looking every inch the potential president as he reviewed the Polish troops.

He gave a solemn speech that talked of standing by allies like Poland, even name-checking Pope John Paul II, Lech Walesa and even Rosa Parks.

But the network news reporters were telling the TV audience back home how Mitt Romney's press person had lost his cool and, as reporters shouted questions at his boss, told them to kiss a portion of his anatomy not usually mentioned on American breakfast TV.

It was the low point of Mitt Romney's overseas trip, and not how Mr Romney wanted this tour to be remembered.

The press "bubble" had revolted, and for a reason.

Life inside the bubble, on tour with a major politician, has a weird effect on those held captive within it.

The orders come thick and fast: get off the plane, get on the bus, hurry up and wait.

"Has any one got wireless? What's the key?"

And the answers from the press too: "No, we can't go yet: I am still filing my TV piece/radio report/blog post."

"Oh well, ok."

Back on the bus. Back on the plane. Days start early and end late, adrenaline-soaked repetition allows a pleasurable numbness to set in - and one of the effects is distorting time itself.

Tight-lipped team

I can hardly believe that it was only a few days ago when I wrote that one danger for politicians on the foreign tour was that the trip becomes about The Trip - the one stumble that kills off all other coverage.

US media's verdict

"Around the World in Weighty Gaffes" is ABC News' headline on Mitt Romney's trip. Michael Falcone writes that while the tour is unlikely to make a significant impact on the US, Mr Romney "needs to change the subject - and fast".

"Maybe Mitt Romney should have just stayed in London and watched the dancing horses. Or just stayed home," Roger Simon writes in Politico, arguing that Mitt Romney could have better spent his time campaigning in swing states.

But in the Weekly Standard, Fred Barnes rates Mr Romney's trip a qualified success, saying the US press has not spotted as many gaffes as they have claimed.

Chris Cillizza writes at the Washington Post that Mr Romney is not passing the commander-in-chief test so far, but that hardly matters in this election year where foreign policy ranks as one of the lowest concerns.

Make that Trips. Mr Romney's perceived mis-steps have gone forth and multiplied.

There have been so many that any other message has been drowned out by the thump-thump-thump of him tumbling down the stairs.

The Romney campaign has a reputation for being so tightly controlled that it will not allow Mr Romney near the press who travel with him.

Perhaps this tour shows the reason why, although the candidate himself hardly seems the type to be an undisciplined spouter who says the first thing that comes into his head.

Some think the caution is Mr Romney's own reaction to a gaffe that did in his dad's presidential hopes, when he said he had been "brainwashed" by US generals over Vietnam.

But whatever the psychological or tactical roots of Mr Romney's decision to stick to a script, it is not great for those covering him, hour by hour.

Some of them have been at it for a year. There are no news conferences and even getting press officers to respond to queries is a major trial.

Barrage of bad news

There is no attempt to whip up the Stockholm syndrome.

Most major politicians are a dab hand at charming at least some of those who trail round behind them, sending their sharp news values into a purring stupor.

Romney: US will stand with Israel

Mr Romney does not bother to chat with the girls and boys on the bus, so they remain uncharmed and untamed.

Even getting any response to the alleged gaffes was an ordeal that lasted for days.

It was literally only in the last few minutes of the tour that a chief strategist eventually said the obvious, briefed that the American people liked those who said what they felt and absolutely none of this had any relevance to voters' real lives.

But we were off the bus. Not too late to file, but too late to wash away the cumulative impression.

The trouble is that, taken together, the barrage of bad news has drowned out the main purpose of the trip: to present Mr Romney as an international statesman-in-waiting.

The trip suggests that in office Mr Romney might be an undiplomatic handful when not bound and gagged by his staff. Will that damage his chances in the November election?

The strategist is right - some Americans relish blunt. Some conservatives have rallied .

After all, Ronald Reagan and George W Bush had their moments that the East Coast perceived as indiscretions, but the Midwest saw as hilarious or righteous. They got elected. Then they got elected again.

Air of nostalgia

But Mr Romney lacks their rumbunctiousness and charisma. It is pretty clear he did not mean to offend and did not think he would.

It is hard to see the casual, undecided, viewer being wowed by Mr Romney's foreign adventure.

But it also points to a larger problem with this tour. How would Mr Reagan and Mr Bush - or rather their foreign policies - do today?

The message behind this trip was to point out what Mr Romney says is President Barack Obama's scorn for good, solid allies like Britain, Israel and Poland.

I hardly think many in Britain are truly offended by the removal of Winston Churchill's bust from the Oval Office four years ago. But many in Poland and Israel are pretty upset by Mr Obama's policy towards them. So it is fair enough.

All in all, there is an air of nostalgia about this trip. There were visits to old allies, where not much different is happening, but no visits to countries that are newly putting into practice the principles of democracy and free enterprise that Mr Romney talks about.

Then there is that threat of war. Americans like toughness, but they do not relish a new conflict.

So there are plenty of questions left to ask about Mr Romney's foreign policy.

But the press secretary need not reach for his bumper book of insults, and the ears of breakfast viewers will not be assaulted again. For Mr Romney is heading home and there the only subject will be the economy.

Mark Mardell, North America editor Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell North America editor

More on This Story

US Presidential Election 2012


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 272.

    Sorry. It can be fun trying to get MagicKirin or MarcusAurelius to give even the eeensy teensiest criticism of Israel. But I've ended up disappointed across the board.
    (I admire their objectivity though.)

  • rate this

    Comment number 271.

    Israel is no more responsible than the U.S was for 9/11 or the U.K was for 7/7....
    You're conflating two individual incidents with a conflict that has been going on for decades with both sides committing violent acts. Not exactly apples to oranges.

  • rate this

    Comment number 270.

    I don't pretend to know about American politics from across the pond. However, all I see are two parties - and nothing in between.

    America can only vote for a Republican or Democratic president.

    I suppose that's the ultimate prize - the power to start wars, or the power to stop them. Is that a too simplistic version of Republicans who start wars and Democrats who pick up the deficit of war?

  • rate this

    Comment number 269.

    Oh here we go - Israel/Palestinians. I doubt anyone here knows what the terms are or not, or who wants what. Please stay on the subject of Romney's foreign trip and out of foreign affairs.

  • rate this

    Comment number 268.

    252 MagicKirin
    There will be peace between Israelis and Palestinians when the first and second generation of Isreali's since it's inception die of old age.

    The third and fourth generation will be less ignorant and racist

  • rate this

    Comment number 267.

    254 What Obama actually said is here

    A site that criticises both Dem and Rep ads. And concludes ‘Regardless, our conclusion is the same: Taking snippets of his speech ignores the larger context of the president’s meaning that a business owner does not become successful “on your own.”’’

  • Comment number 266.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this

    Comment number 265.

    263. MagicKirin

    Israel is no more responsible than the U.S was for 9/11 or the U.K was
    for 7/7. Israel has proven they want peace the Plestinians have not.
    What ?!?
    Israel wants a piece of land for sure but unless that statement was misspelled you have a rather warped view of the facts.
    Some want peace perhaps but many want it under their terms and those terms are not very nice

  • Comment number 264.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 263.

    Ref #257Well let's stop right there, shall we? Do you hold Israel COMPLETELY blameless for the violence in that part of the world? Even violence perpetrated by them? If not, give a percentage. You'll admit Israel is, say, 5% guilty?

    Israel is no more responsible than the U.S was for 9/11 or the U.K was for 7/7. Israel has proven they want peace the Plestinians have not

  • rate this

    Comment number 262.

    252. Magiic

    "Truth hurts, islamic based govermnt is intolerant and regressive just look at Turkey"

    Turkey's is a secular government. Has been since Ataturk. What are you talking about?

  • Comment number 261.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 260.

    204. Andrea

    "The last thing Americans are worried about right now are actors on the world stage and our image abroad."

    We never care too much about those things even during the good times.

    A candidate simply has to perform well enough on the world stage to assure the electorate that foreign relations won't be a problem during his administration.

    Romney didn't do that and he needs to somehow.

  • rate this

    Comment number 259.

    @248 'Billythefirst'
    We know that BBC HYS is monitored (we can't include moderation) as it's part of the brief.

    There are many issues that should be opened for debate - even fewer since 2010. The BBC is under pressure, but there no excuse for neuturing the BBC as you have rightly said yourself in previous posts.

    Once the publicly-owned and unique BBC is gone - we will despair at the dross.

  • rate this

    Comment number 258.

    246. DenverGuest
    29 MIS AGO
    Protecting Americans no matter where in the world the threat to us is is job one for the President.I don't care about the details of how he gets it done
    Coalition building, starting with not insulting our allies, is always a good start. Or is that just one of those insignificant details?
    Alas, Sul. was referring to killings kids Not Diplom. Relations

  • rate this

    Comment number 257.

    ref #251
    To mention the Palestinians without acknowledging that they are responsible for the violence.....
    Well let's stop right there, shall we? Do you hold Israel COMPLETELY blameless for the violence in that part of the world? Even violence perpetrated by them? If not, give a percentage. You'll admit Israel is, say, 5% guilty?

  • rate this

    Comment number 256.

    142. skayd
    It's always the press' fault when a Republican makes a fool of himself. Why is that?
    Ain't that the truth
    love it

  • rate this

    Comment number 255.

    210 MagicKirin

    “I think the victimhood cries are coming from Mark and his fellows who seems to have aproblem with the lack of respect they are being shown by Romney.”

    While in fact the victimhood cries are coming from Romney and other Reps and his slavish supporters, who whine constantly when the media do anything outrageous like ask them a question

  • rate this

    Comment number 254.

    219 John_From_Dublin
    “...when he said ‘you didn't build that’, meaning that businesses rely on infrastructure they didn't build…”

    That might be what he meant to say, but it’s not what he did say. When Obama said; “If you got a business…you didn’t build that”, he is referring to that business not infrastructure. No one is misrepresenting his statement, he said it.

  • rate this

    Comment number 253.

    Re: Suilerua
    The cynic in me is bordering on the belief that Suilerua can not in reality be making such comments as he is, except to aim to have the most 'Lowest Rated' comments in any Comment thread involving the 'politics' of the US.


Page 1 of 14



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.