Debate: Should Iran get the bomb?

Help

A new article by Kenneth Waltz in Foreign Affairs arguing that a nuclear Iran would mean a more stable Middle East has provoked debate on foreign policy experts.

John Mearsheimer, of the University of Chicago, and Dov Zakheim, a former US undersecretary of defence, join the BBC's Rajesh Mirchandani, to discuss the article and the implications of Iran developing a nuclear weapon.

Mr Mearsheimer says that mutually assured destruction means that Iran or any other country is highly unlikely to use the bomb offensively, while Mr Zakheim says any risk of nuclear attack is too great and a nuclear Iran could lead an regional arms nuclear race.

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.