Obama launches campaign on a personal note
President Obama says Mitt Romney has no "better vision" of America's future
This weekend saw the official launch of President Obama's campaign to win the White House for a second term.
I had been wondering what on earth would be new about these rallies. After all, for months he has been turning up in a couple of swing states every week arguing his case and highlighting the ways in which he claimed the Republicans were blocking sensible proposals.
This was official government business, not an election campaign, they told us, but it was hard to spot the difference.
The difference this weekend is that it got personal. He's calling Mitt Romney out by name.
Mind you, he went out of his way to make sure it didn't sound too personal.
"Governor Romney is a patriotic American who has raised a wonderful family, and he has much to be proud of," he said.
"He's run a large financial firm, and he's run a state."
But he went on: "I think he has drawn the wrong lessons from those experiences. He sincerely believes that if CEOs and wealthy investors like him make money, the rest of us will automatically prosper as well."
“Start Quote
End Quote Dan Balz Washington PostObama launches campaign against Romney, but his real opponent is the economy”
Obama is also sounding a positive, patriotic note. It is a familiar, but often successful tactic by an incumbent - to portray your opponents as running the country down.
"The other side won't be offering these Americans a real answer to these questions. They won't offer a better vision or a new set of ideas... Over and over again, they will tell you that America is down and out."
The Romney campaign have condemned all this as "the same distractions, distortions, excuses, and finger pointing that we've grown used to from this White House."
No matter how hard Barack Obama tries to make this election about "hype and blame", as Mitt Romney put it, "it's still the economy - and we're not stupid."
That is the huge hurdle that Obama has to leap. As the Washington Post wisely if inelegantly put it: "Obama launches campaign against Romney, but his real opponent is the economy".
One message you could take from the two European elections is the scarcely surprising one that incumbents get kicked out when the economy is bad.
But you could also argue those particular incumbents are suffering for implementing austerity programmes.
Americans may have a different attitude towards government spending but it will be fascinating to see how Romney fares with his promise of deeper cuts against Obama's arguments for continued stimulus for some areas of the economy.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~12~RS~)



Five challenges facing the president
Sopranos actor James Gandolfini dies
Disaster on ice
Renegade reporter
Bad tip?
Ye gods
Talking Movies
Comment number 1.
JClarkson7th May 2012 - 2:54
I HOPE the American public will CHANGE this administration. BO has been an ineffective president, who relied on his oratory skills to carry him through a job which requires much more than demagoguery.
"President Obama says Mitt Romney has no "better vision" of America's future."
Therefore, re-elect me because he (Romney) is no better than me?
Most pathetic argument ever?
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
KScurmudgeon7th May 2012 - 3:47
I predict the demographics of the vote will follow the demographics of the donations.
There are many more human people than there are corporate 'people'.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
scott_seattle7th May 2012 - 3:58
It's true that Obama's biggest challenge is the economy. While he inherited the mess handed him by Bush, he chose to increase the war in Afghanistan, open more foreign bases, and continue the failed war on drugs and other Bush/Reagan policies.
Obama had a chance to make real change, but he has instead remained centrist to appease his opponents, rather than deliver on his promise to supporters.
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
Jay7th May 2012 - 4:20
It's surprising that it took so long & an Obama to pass the law banning insider trading by senators/congressmen in US. It's more surprising why a state governor or a govt official at "important" position is not yet banned to accept corporate jobs within certain years of holding public office!
There are too many compelling reasons why corporate CEOs can never be a decent (forget "good") president.
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
Jay7th May 2012 - 4:31
Price of 2 drugs in US- Jenuvia $225.21 (30 tab) & Finacea $176.56 (15gm). The price of the same drugs, by same manufacturers in India- $4.52 & $0.45 respectively! I know the drug companies are making good profit in India too!
The main target by GOP, "Obamacare" is NOT even a fraction that a civilized democracy need to have for its people.GOP is against even that to protect big insurance/drug Co.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 162