Republicans stuck in the doldrums
Republican hopeful Mitt Romney campaigns in Illinois before the primary
Illinois has played a vital role in America's presidential history. In 1858 the all but unknown Lincoln made his name in a series of debates there with Stephen Douglas about slavery.
In 1968 there were riots outside the Democratic Convention as they debated who should replace LBJ who had dramatically given up the chance to fight for another term.
In 2008 Obama spoke to a crowd overwhelmed by emotion in Grant Park as he was elected.
I can always be proved wrong but I have got a feeling tonight is not going to be one of those nights.
Step back, and the Republican race is fascinating. What it says about the country and the Republican party is important.
But at the moment, the candidates are stuck like a ship in the doldrums, with not enough wind to move them forward. Or perhaps make that another area feared by sailors of old, the horse latitudes.
According to one theory at least they were called that because the ships would not move until some cargo, often horses, were thrown overboard. Until we hear the splash of "mute nostril agony" as one of the candidates hits the water maybe nothing will change.
Romney inches to victoryI have not spoken to one serious, objective observer who seriously doubts an eventual Romney victory.
It is indeed difficult to find flaws in the argument from Romney's campaign that the maths is with them if you trust caucus predictions. He inches towards the magic figure of 1144, which means he has won.
Rick Santorum hopes the Illinois primary will reverse his fall in the polls
Santorum mocks the maths and insists he will take this to the convention in August. He has a point. Victory by slide rule is not inspiring.
But even an Illinois victory would not be a game changer on its own. To alter the dynamic, Santorum would have to win everywhere, and win big.
An unbroken series of blow-out victories might just destabilise Romney and undermine the kids with the slide rules.
At the moment Rick Santorum is doing just enough to look like a serious candidate, but not enough to make anyone think he is going to win.
He inexplicably threw away any chance of making an impact in Puerto Rico by going out of his way to annoy Spanish speaking voters. He is now telling voters in Illinois that the election is not about the economy. He is falling behind in the latest polls.
Illinois may break the logjam. It is certainly possible. But I have the feeling that another result, and another 24 hours will just tell us there will be more hand-to-hand fighting before a victor emerges.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~53~RS~)



Obama's full statement on deficit
Suburban plea for political healing
Chuck Hagel on Obama's new term
Obama cries as he speaks to staff
Can Republicans broaden appeal?
The challenges facing President Obama
What next for Mitt Romney?
Top US Republican on 'fiscal cliff'
World leaders congratulate Obama
'I called Obama to congratulate him'
Moment US TV called Obama win
How Mitt Romney's defeat unfolded
Where did Mitt Romney go wrong?
Obama defends 'just' drones war
Believe it or not
Coffee 'overdose'
Day in pictures
Schemers and plotters
Winning business
Talking Movies
Comment number 1.
MrCinColumlbus20th March 2012 - 11:52
Romney? Santorum?
With choices like this, its no wonder many people will not vote
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
powermeerkat20th March 2012 - 12:19
Who's going to win in Illinois?
Why, obviously the local community organizer.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
watriler20th March 2012 - 12:29
Read the next article to the one posted by Mark about the sayings and writings of Santorum and you might wonder why he is still in the race and then to go on to realise that crackpot religious and moral views appeal to a large section of the Republican community. Would intelligent design ever have produced the views of Mr Santorum!
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
Phffft20th March 2012 - 12:34
Republicans stuck in the doldrums
The term appears to have arisen in the 18th century (when cross-Equator sailing voyages became more common). It is derived from dold (an archaic term meaning "stupid") and -rum(s), a noun suffix found in such words as "tantrum".
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
PartTimeDon20th March 2012 - 13:03
This post worries me.
Even US politics doesn't operate at a pace that satisfies 24h hour news coverage. This is a serious process and shouldn't be dramatic. People need to make serious decisions about their country's future. Drama adds confusion and detracts from reasoned debate.
I worry that Mark's hankering for an entertaining process might be more in his own interests than Americas.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 131