Shame, embarrassment and Congress

 
Members of Congress listen to an address by President Barack Obama, 8 September 2011 Continuing inaction in Congress is dismaying many seasoned observers of US politics

Related Stories

I'm humming Elvis Costello's (The Angels Wanna Wear My) Red Shoes as I watch the latest congressional carry-on.

Political reporters, by their very nature, enjoy politics, like its cut and thrust, and above all the rows and arguments that are the lifeblood of any democracy.

But reading coverage of Congress by my American colleagues what comes over is shame and embarrassment. Yet again, the very funding of the government itself has been held up by wrangling between parties, and between the Senate and the House of Representatives.

The Costello line that is repeating in my head is: "I used to be disgusted and now I try to be amused."

But it is the wrong way round. If people here used to find the congressional capers funny, they now despair.

The former Fox News White House correspondent Major Garret asks: "Have they gone mad?" A commentator at The Hill pleads: "Stop the insanity". The Daily Beast calls it a "recurring bad dream".

It is, of course, all about spending versus cuts. The Republicans don't want to pass a bill that spends more on disaster relief without spending cuts elsewhere.

The Democrats don't accept that trade-off. But the stand-off is dangerous.

Remember that in August Standard and Poor's downgraded the US, not because of its economic prospects but because of how near it came to not agreeing a budget and the danger that revealed of "governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable".

Perhaps the most interesting take on all of this that I have read is from David Frum, who argues: "What's happening before our eyes is that the US congressional system is adopting the attitudes of a Westminster-style parliamentary system."

He points out that only works when one party (or coalition) is in charge, whereas "in a system built around an administration and a bicameral Congress, everybody is part of the government - and the government only functions if there exists a certain baseline spirit of co-operation between the mutually indispensable parts".

Frum argues that the glue that held American government together has dissolved in a partisan, polarised atmosphere, no longer lubricated by prosperity.

He says profound institutional change is needed (he doesn't describe it, but he does at least have some sort of prescription).

Dismay at Washington's shenanigans is so common as to be a cliche, but a growing number argue this isn't simply individuals behaving badly but about a quiet crisis of governance in America.

The trouble is, no-one has faintest clue how to solve it.

 
Mark Mardell, North America editor Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell North America editor

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -11

    Comment number 1.

    "The trouble is, no-one has faintest clue how to solve it."

    The next elections will solve it.

  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 2.

    Vote all the Tea Party reactionaries out, vote in people who are more moderate (Rep or Dem), and stop this crazy no-compromise party politics that has ruined our reputation abroad, and has brought public trust in the government to an all new low. These reactionary and historical revisionist Tea Party members need to be cut out like a cancer with the white hot blade of an election.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 3.

    Of course it would help if there was a majority in both houses of the same party as the president. There is so much power in the president as executive although not as much as the British prime minister with an overall majority. The president is not just the head of state (c.f. Ireland). The separation of 'powers' was designed to frustrate radical action and on occasions it has often succeeded!

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 4.

    #3 "The separation of 'powers' was designed to frustrate radical action and on occasions it has often succeeded!"

    Such as the present moment.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 5.

    It is surprising where a Countrry that advocates for global democracy has lost Statesman Ship in its Government Machinary and what we her every day is One Party blaming the Oher.

 

Comments 5 of 471

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

  • NS Savannah, 1962Nuclear dream

    The ship that totally failed to change the world


  • Espresso cup7 days quiz

    Which city serves the strongest cup of coffee?


  • Glasgow 2014 quaichs and medalsQuaich guide

    What do the Scottish gifts given to Games medallists symbolise?


  • Malaysian plane wreckage in UkraineFlight risk

    How odd is it for three planes to crash in eight days?


  • israel flagDos and don'ts

    Can you criticise Israel without being anti-Semitic?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.