9/11 anniversary: Time for nation-building at home

 
Ground Zero memorial in New York on 10 September 2011 9/11 altered perspectives for many Americans

It is the first time I have seen the Memorial Fountains at Ground Zero working. They are pretty impressive. The footprints of where the towers once stood have been turned into square pools, dark and huge, a waterfall on each side. All around the edges are engraved the names of those who died in the buildings.

But looking out of the window as I write, part of the area is still a building site, a huge square of churned-up mud. Five giant diggers squat, for the moment idle, the area scattered with concrete cylinders and metal parts.

It has taken a long time to turn a scar into a memorial, and the job is not yet done. America too has not fully absorbed and digested the events of that day, but it is beginning to do so.

President Obama's weekly radio address suggests some of the ways he thinks America should move on. But some of the changes will probably never go away.

When I arrived in New York, I left the train at Penn Station under the watchful eye of a man holding a heavy machine gun. On the concourse, a video was playing on a huge TV screen about a "three foot hero" keeping us all safe - the tale of a sniffer dog. As I made my way downtown, the police were stopping every large van and lorry. This is exceptional, but every time you go into an airport you know life has changed.

During the summer, when I first started asking Americans about how 9/11 had changed their country, I was surprised. I had been expecting something about the wars, or other philosophical reflections. Instead they talked about queues at airports. It has become a new way of a life in the last 10 years.

Security has got tighter in the UK too but, because of the IRA campaign, it had always been there in the background. For us in Britain the change was incremental, for Americans it was the start of something new. The USA's enemies have imposed an irksome but necessary burden on all Americans.

So a sense of vulnerability and the priority of protection will remain.

Decade of war

But, although President Obama will stand alongside former president George W Bush on Sunday, I expect he will make clear in his evening speech in Washington that the priorities are rather different to the initial response.

Rather like his speech to congress, his weekly radio address appealed for a common spirit and unity but was quite political.

He pointed out that it was only while he was president that the war against al-Qaeda had scored major triumphs.

"Over the past two and a half years, more senior al-Qaeda leaders have been eliminated than at any time since 9/11. And thanks to the remarkable courage and precision of our forces, we finally delivered justice to Osama bin Laden."

He suggested that at least some of the military action that flowed for 9/11 was falling into al-Qaeda's trap.

"They wanted to draw us into endless wars, sapping our strength and confidence as a nation. But even as we put relentless pressure on al-Qaeda, we're ending the war in Iraq and beginning to bring our troops home from Afghanistan."

Then another critical point.

After a hard decade of war, it is time for nation-building here at home.

On Friday night, on the Ten O'Clock news, I had used the same phrase - saying that is what some Americans were reflecting. I had no idea of course the president was about to use it.

It is a new formulation, but I had most recently heard it from Republican candidate John Huntsman in their recent debate.

It suggests that, on left and right, the biggest change is that an enthusiasm to re-shape the world has faded, even if there is still a determination to make it safer for America and its allies.

 
Mark Mardell, North America editor Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell North America editor

More on This Story

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 1.

    The hard decade will last a lot longer than ten years but let's hope USA will have learnt the ultimate futility and unaffordability of interventions. It's just possible that they will think of the 50M+ of its people who do not share in the wealth of the richest nation on earth even though Gov Perry does appear to be in the ascendency. Sometimes Mark sounds as if he is reporting from another planet

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 2.

    The US federal government is not capable of nation-building on its own, here or abroad. It needs to involve all the participants in our economy, and that includes big business, financial institutions and republicans. Like it or not, they are all a part of our nation, and our success depends on them as well. Shutting them out will only make our recovery wobbly and prone to tumbling.

  • Comment number 3.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 4.

    Of course 'we' were 'together', at '9/11', against the murder of innocents

    We were similarly together before 9/11, and will always be so

    Why then the attack, the need to make 'war', and 'terror' on-going?

    Clues in Brown's 'Britishness', and 'a time for nation-building'

    Time rather for humility, humanity, education against hypocrisy?

    To SHARE World, Evolution, Democracy: Equality not Greed

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 5.

    In the past 10 years, we've read and heard a lot about what 9/11 was. What happened? What are the ramifications? What will change?

    We haven't heard nearly enough about WHY anyone would go to such lengths, for any reason. Unfortunately, such talk was lost in rhetoric about freedom and liberty, which had nothing to do with the reason why this happened. I fear history is doomed to repeat itself.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    " It's just possible that they will think of the 50M+ of its people who do not share in the wealth of the richest nation on earth even though Gov Perry does appear to be in the ascendency."




    Please, subtract 20 millions of illegal aliens from that number first.

    And then we'll talk.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 7.

    re #5 "We haven't heard nearly enough about WHY anyone would go to such lengths [9/11 terrorist attacks], for any reason."




    Hardly possible to explain without seriously violating principle of civilizational equivalency, multiculturalism and, last but not least, political correctness which prevents any free discussion of the problem.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    Re #5 "We haven't heard nearly enough about WHY anyone would go to such lengths, for any reason."


    Hardly possible to explain without seriously violating principle of civilizational equivalency, multiculturalism and, last but not least, political correctness which prevents any free discussion of the problem.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 9.

    Obama has had three years to rebuild the nation and so far has left it more divided than ever. You Mardell, widely recognised as an Obama supporter, have one year to show how your hero is carrying out this task.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 10.

    5 An American
    "We haven't heard nearly enough about WHY anyone would go to such lengths, for any reason."
    -
    You mean you really don't know? Post WW2 you have been traipsing around the world smashing people's countries to bits and you are surprised some retaliate? You may see yourselves as 'The Chosen Ones' to bring your so-called democracy to the word but they don't obviously see it your way

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 11.

    POTENTIAL for 'evil' is in all: homes, schools, streets and governments

    Logical, emotional, angry, misguided, extremes may drive cycles of violence

    UNWISE therefore of SOCIETY to tempt fate by tolerating INJUSTICE

    Life cannot be 'a game' for most with responsibilities to self, family, world

    "What profit" in passing on a fortune, if to be spent in a Hell on Earth?

    The NON-extreme is EQUALITY

  • Comment number 12.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 13.

    Through arbitrary imprisonment, torture and slaughter of so many since 9/11, the US has lost all credibility and sympathy internationally. And it's well on the way to getting the government it deserves.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 14.

    AnAmerican @5
    Thanks for pertinent observation, on rhetoric and implicit distance from 'freedom and liberty'

    powermeerkat @6
    20 million 'illegal alien' human beings to obstruct talk for world justice?

    ProfPhoenix @9
    Yes Obama has ducked real issues - but how about the rest of us?

    margaret howard @10
    An American's point missed - and what of OUR 'so-called democracy'?

  • Comment number 15.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 16.

    I_Am_Troy_Davis @12
    'Self-determination' - through frank dictatorship and mock-democracy?
    'Empowerment' - to emulate the inegalitarian 'ethic' of the 'developed'?
    Would freed citizens of Europe and US choose to stoke arms races?

    Po_1100 @13
    The powerless and benighted, wherever, need sympathy and help.
    Even the mightiest but pawns to Mammon?

  • Comment number 17.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 18.

    I_Am_Troy_Davis @15
    Point well taken, but…

    We DO live in a dangerous world - too EASY to criticise SECURITY forces?

    Operational TARGET has to be what MAKES world dangerous - INJUSTICE

    NOT easy to escape rule of FEAR & GREED, essentially of IGNORANCE

    Human struggle has given some freedom - to campaign & vote for human dignity in EQUALITY

    Enduring democracy needs individual security for all

  • Comment number 19.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 20.

    I_Am_Troy_Davis @19
    400ch limit danger

    Easy to misunderstand each other

    Fair to defend 'multiculturalism' as respect for people, carrying joys & curses of our 'cultural backgrounds'

    But 'we' can mistake 'our backgrounds' as 'of eternity' - in fact created / evolved over time by 'others' (forebears & neighbours & world), in at least 'different' states of 'knowledge'

    All 'need' to move on…?

 

Page 1 of 34

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.